[quote]A-rod wrote:
You certainly are. As I believe we all are. I was hoping for some proper discourse when this clown throws race into the mix. That is more a social/psychological/cultural issue then it is a fight issue.
Now to that idiot:
Your logic is impeccable. You are right about white fear of black superiority. You are attempting to address issues that are way beyond your comprehension and most others for that matter.
I love the argument that slavery bred genetically superior humans. Now I am not saying selective breeding could not improve the quality of the progeny/offspring but that is not what happened. I will concede that most likely the most hearty of the group would survive the voyage across the Atlantic. But most hearty does not equate to six foot five and two hundred and fifty lbs specimens or mean that that person has a preferential ratio of fast to slow twitch fibers. Also there are so many factors involved that it is very difficult to make such a claim.
Also you have poor slave owners who could not shell out top dollar for the most robust of slaves. What do they do? They purchase the “runts” of the group, the less robust individuals. So you have struggling plantations with “inferior” product. Now this inferior product is left to procreate at their leisure more or less. So you have inferior product mating with other inferior product to produce a similar product.
Then throw on top of that the fact that you have 160 (post emancipation) years of blacks choosing who they want to mate with. So you having mingling of all the groups for a 160 years. That is over six generations. That would definitely negate any sort of advantage of the selective breeding process that you believed to have happened. This sort of breeding happened far less then you think. Slaves had slave quarters where they pretty much did whatever they wanted. Control over the slaves was not as extensive as most people believe.
By your same logic I could argue that blacks are in significant deficit cognitively when compared to whites. Why you might ask? Oh because surviving the voyage across the Atlantic did not demand any sort of superior intelligence just simple brawn. Also that the blacks once they got here were not selectively bred for intelligence but physical characteristics therefore blacks are intellectually inferior in the same capacity in which you are implying whites are physically inferior to blacks.
Perhaps the differences are cultural but that is not as interesting so no one likes to discuss that. The fact that the majority of blacks come from lower socio-economic class and have a disproportionate amount of emphasis on athletics could be a reason.
My point is humans are not dogs or rats. You can breed for certain traits but it would take a highly controlled breeding program and some time to produce the kind of people that you think the slave trade produced.
Oh and as for 10 inch black cocks stuffing white girlfriends. GTFO with that shit. That is equally ridiculous. I have reviewed that literature and while it does show that people from the continent of Africa are slightly more endowed it is not a very significant difference. It also was a measurement of flaccid length not erect length. Some people are growers not showers. Also at the top of the list were North Africans which would be Moroccans, Algerians, Egyptians Etc. These are considered white people. Egyptians especially where at the top of that list. Oh and one more thing to take into account is the fact that these measurements were self reported. There was no researcher with a ruler measuring dicks which provides a margin for infallibility.
I am biracial before you ask.
So if you want to get back to actually discussing the fight that would be nice.
[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
this is a joke right
I’m being trolled
right?[/quote][/quote]
You seem irrationally angry.
Also, no it was not the voyage that led to black genetic superiority. It was white americva keeping black people as slaves for so long, working them horrendously, the weak dying of and a truly masterful race emerging, after slavery was abolished this continued with jim crow and black people still pretty much slaves, no access to to the things white people had, this continued to kill off the black people who were weaker.
If you look at the historical writing about the vikings we see the same thing, white giants with blonde and red hair, double the size of the Romans who ran away in fear of the Germanic tribes upon first encounters.
The vikings had to plunder because they lived in such harsh lands, the result was a form of naturally enforced eugenics that led to a genetic level where they all reached a certain stature, like Giraffes did and black people in North America have today.
This stuff really inst up for debate, it is just a fact.
Also on a side note I was being silly because of your response which itself was pretty dumb.
French people have the largest penis on average.
And I still maintain white fear of black superiority is the number one reason white people are desperate to see black champions dethroned throughout the last hundred years of combat sports, particularly in boxing.
White people often try and salvage their self imposed masculine integrity by using the racist throw out of " they are only good at sports like animals chimps etc"
That’s why you see racism most angry nowadays when it is thrown at black intelligentsia like Huey P or N . D Tyson or even a black president, who while he has lots of issues to be criticized on, most often gets hate because of his biracial heritage. It is because while black people are dominating sports, the intellectual leadership needs to be kept in the race of the dominant culture, in lots of people minds.
Jones has received overwhelming hate since becoming champion yet Nick Diaz got massive amounts of support.
Nick Diaz acted cocky and mouthy and proclaimed himself the best in the world, yet Nick did not come close to threatening white masculinity did he. There are some terrific books on the subject that I won’t name because I don’t want people to think I am hawking products.
Jones has one major flaw, He is a black, confident champion who acknowledges how great He is and will go on to be.
The same as Ali was called an uppity this and that in his time. People need to address the racism that persists and flourishes in combat sports. I have black family and black friends and it would be nice to think when they go on to have grandchildren they won’t have to worry about being hated for being great.
But yes lets get back to the fight. How did you actually score the fight?
edit
*“Perhaps the differences are cultural but that is not as interesting so no one likes to discuss that. The fact that the majority of blacks come from lower socio-economic class and have a disproportionate amount of emphasis on athletics could be a reason”
This is the continuation of the enforced only the strong survive. Worse healthcare, worse housing, harder environment, etc etc. The fact some people would as you say not even look at that situation kind of proves my point on the attitude to race.