[quote]rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Or are the very reason that there are laws illegalizing steroids in the first place. Because such people exist. And there are a lot of them.
What do you define as “a lot”?
Anecdotal evidence showould hardly be the standard.
From here and on other boards, I know of probably 40 or so folks that research extensively, weight the risks, and proceed with AAS use in a very calculated manner. So if we are going to base our positions on anecdotal evidence, the judicious, well educated users of AAS outnumber the idiots in my experience.
You never hearof the smart guys that use. You only hear news reports about the idiots that misused.
Personally, I think you are acting like the witch-hunters. Armed with just enough knowledge to be dangerous, you think you have a handle on what goes on in a world you know nothing about.
[/quote]
I don’t define anything as a lot. I’m not defining anything at all. I’m not knowedgeable enough on the issue. But I don’t a lot of people here are either. People assume that because they and the like-minded serious lifters they know approach steroid use intelligently, that is what most people who use also do. It’s a natural assumption that applies to everything.
We are largely limited by our perspective. Chances are you’re not gonna know personally or know about high school or college athletes abusing steroids or how prevalent use or abuse is. It doesn’t relate to your own experience. If the evidence is out there, either way, I would like to see it. If evidence could be presented to Congress that abuse, particularly among young athletes, was actually very small, I think it would go a a long way towards legalization. I’m not sure that even if the evidence was compelling enough, it would accomplish this however. Steroids have been demonized. And it’s hard to remove the stigma of something that’s been demonized even when all logic mandates it.
I’ve seen an adundance of ignorance from the anti-steroid lobby. But I haven’t seen the kind of compelling evidence and arguments that would POTENTIALLY make them see the light (or at least would a reasonable person). It doesn’t mattter that steroids can be used intelligently in a way that greatly minimizes potential harm. It doesn’t even matter that a large percentage of users DO use intelligently.
What might matter and what SHOULD matter is that the abuse is minimal, and particularly, that it’s minimal in the class of people who we are seeking to protect. Maybe that evidence is out there. If it is, I would like to be pointed to it. And if it is, it should be heavily stressed.