[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
[quote]tom63 wrote:
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
I don’t understand how anyone is complaining that it was predictable. No shit it was predictable. I was expecting an over the top action flick with cheesy one-liners, a nonsensical plot, bad acting and a body count in the 1,000’s. I got everything I expected and more. It wasn’t the best action flick I’ve ever seen, but it was definitely the flick with the best action. I will see it again in the theatres, and I will buy it the day it comes out.[/quote]
Exactly. So many movies I saw as a kid weren’t good, were cheesy, and had a predictable plot. Commando, please? Conan, come on? Rambo 2, 3, Rocky movies, every Arnold film that did have a robot in it?
They all suck as quality acting, plot, and development films and win as action flicks.[/quote]
I disagree. The Rocky movies you could get into. Maybe they were overproduced by they were still quality movies.
And Terminator? T2? Those were intense, good movies.
And even the lower rung, the Blood Sports, etc. were good time movies.
This one though just really grated on me the wrong way, I think because the guys in it CAN act, and have done so pretty well in other movies- guys like Jet Li, Stallone, Steve Austin, etc.
But it seemed like everyone just mailed this one in and didn’t even try. Like I said, Statham and Crews were the only guys in that movie that even resembled “actors.”
Stallone really needs to stop getting plastic surgery and start devoting more time to writing things that don’t suck.[/quote]
Irish, you’re killin’ me!!! I don’t feel like they mailed it in at all. I feel liked they hammed it up and played it exactly the way it was supposed to be played. No one took themselves too seriously, everybody was over the top [another great cheesy 80’s flick, by the way] in the best possible 80’s way and shit got fucking destroyed left and right. Dude, I think you’re over-analyzing a movie starring all the great 80’s action icons called “The Expendables”. I’m not really sure what you were expecting?