[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Fact naturals can only synthesis so much muscle in a time period
Fact only so many calories are needed for this
Fact eating more adds only bF that will need to be lost unless BF is of no concern
Anything others want to add to this list?[/quote]
I’ve posted TWO references so far that support the argument that muscle can be force fed into existence. Please post ONE reference which supports the basic premise behind what you wrote.
(Plus heres a clue you need to write a coherent argument before you actually try and argue for it, so “Fact naturals can only synthesis so much muscle in a time period” is a retarded premise, since any person, who either lifts doesn’t, uses steroids or not or masturbates regularly can only synthesi(ze) so much muscle in a time period…
Oh and heres another clue. The “fact” that you can only synthesize a limited amount of muscle tissue in a given time period is not conclusive proof that overfeeding does not change that limit, since the rate is dependant on hormonal status and inuslin is a hormone.
[/quote]
Did those references say the extra muscle was from fore feeding? No
To your middle statement I am not sure it’s english, it makes no sense.
I don’t believe I said anything about force feeding in any of my points. But since you brought it up I will wait for a study to show force feeding changes your bodies ability to syntheiss muscle [/quote]
Your first statement makes no sense, I’m not sure it’s english.
See how gay that was? I ducked the question and managed to make out like im stupid and don’t understand english.
I’ll use what limited powers of reasoning I have to attempt to decipher that incoherent statement.
Did the abstract say those muscles were from force feeding, no. Did the reference? Pull it and read it. You might learn something. Like what quoting a reference means. Does it take much common sense to deduce that when the paper is looking at the upper limit of fat free mass in trained humans, that when sumos are compared to bodybuilders, both groups renown for their eating, that the main and most important factor in becoming a sumo wrestler and therefore gaining muscle mass is the emphasis on eating?
Not much. But more than you have available to you obviously. Ever wonder why such a large part of their diet is rice?
Sumos are not renown for their excessive drug use. Yet they have exceeded bodybuilders, and more importantly the LIMITS on naturally obtained fat free mass for a given height from that faggy table.
Now why don’t you go find some references that support your argument (note what I said there) and post them? Should be a good laugh judging by what you came up with in regard to steroids. And if you do happen to admit to being retarded by not bothering to post anything then I guess someone else could hold your hand and do it for you.
[/quote]
What was laughable what I came up with in regards to AAS?
I would also like to know how you know sumos don’t use drugs?
And 3rdly me trying find references for you is am utter waste of my time as I just see you as a troll[/quote]
What was laughable was that I should eat grass and take estrogen to get hooooge.
Can you PLEASE go to school and learn basic reading comprehension. I stated that sumos are not renown for EXCESSIVE drug use. Some sumos do use drugs, this is fact. Do they dose up ronnie coleman style? No they don’t. Your average bodybuilder uses way more gear than your average sumo.
And 3rdly, its a waste of time because there aren’t any hence the challenge, and trolls don’t take the time to make reasoned posts backed up with evidence like I do. So I guess you are retarded after all. Good luck with that.
Have you grasped why your first premise was meaningless yet? PX summed it up nicely.[/quote]
Animal studies in many areas area ll we have better than nothing and the point was that estrogen added extra fat when using tren plz go re read
So now you are saying that sumos do use drugs and have more mass than natty body builders weird