Pleasantly surprised by the outcome and believe justice has been served. The female attackers overstepped the mark and one cannot fault an individual for going to any lengths to protect himself.
At your very core every Human wants to feel a degree of safety At Home and At Work. This will always be in the minds of the Masses. Lawyer, Judge, Jury.
That is why this verdict is of no surprise to me.
I’ll let the rest of you debate the legality of it.
[quote]four60 wrote:
At your very core every Human wants to feel a degree of safety At Home and At Work. This will always be in the minds of the Masses. Lawyer, Judge, Jury.
That is why this verdict is of no surprise to me.
I’ll let the rest of you debate the legality of it.[/quote]
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Soooooooooooooooo… is he getting his job back?[/quote]
The Screaming lady got his Job.
If you buy your kid anything but a Happy Meal she jumps over the counter and Screams “someone help, call the police, WE MUST PROTECT THE CHILDREN”
[quote]four60 wrote:
At your very core every Human wants to feel a degree of safety At Home and At Work. This will always be in the minds of the Masses. Lawyer, Judge, Jury.
That is why this verdict is of no surprise to me.
I’ll let the rest of you debate the legality of it.[/quote]
Not a verdict.
Grand jury said there wasnt enough evidence to even go to trial. Bizarre.
[quote]four60 wrote:
At your very core every Human wants to feel a degree of safety At Home and At Work. This will always be in the minds of the Masses. Lawyer, Judge, Jury.
That is why this verdict is of no surprise to me.
I’ll let the rest of you debate the legality of it.[/quote]
Not a verdict.
Grand jury said there wasnt enough evidence to even go to trial. Bizarre.
[/quote]
[quote]four60 wrote:
At your very core every Human wants to feel a degree of safety At Home and At Work. This will always be in the minds of the Masses. Lawyer, Judge, Jury.
That is why this verdict is of no surprise to me.
I’ll let the rest of you debate the legality of it.[/quote]
Not a verdict.
Grand jury said there wasnt enough evidence to even go to trial. Bizarre.
[/quote]
Why Bizarre?
[/quote]
You don’t find it bizarre there’s a video of the whole incident and the reason for no trial was a lack of sufficient evidence?
[quote]fizzyduck wrote:
one cannot fault an individual for going to any lengths to protect himself.[/quote]
Um. Yes you can. Well that is if you follow the law of every state in the US.
As a statement, that’s simply wrong.
As an opinion, that’s fucking retarded.
Im not getting into any debates though so say whatever you want. [/quote]
I can understand what you are saying, but in this instance we will have to agree to disagree. This is not a case of a man who loses it in an arguement and then overeacts and attacks. This is a case of a man who was abused, assualted, threatened and then was encountered by two individuals attempting to attack him further.
This case has provoked a great deal of controversy, but most of it comes down to the fact that it involves two women. One has to wonder if you would be making those comments if women were not involved. No is my answer.
[quote]four60 wrote:
At your very core every Human wants to feel a degree of safety At Home and At Work. This will always be in the minds of the Masses. Lawyer, Judge, Jury.
That is why this verdict is of no surprise to me.
I’ll let the rest of you debate the legality of it.[/quote]
Not a verdict.
Grand jury said there wasnt enough evidence to even go to trial. Bizarre.
[/quote]
Why Bizarre?
[/quote]
You don’t find it bizarre there’s a video of the whole incident and the reason for no trial was a lack of sufficient evidence?[/quote]
What did we see?
Yelling, they jump he ran got cornered picked up something hit. The other things are out of view.
[quote]four60 wrote:
At your very core every Human wants to feel a degree of safety At Home and At Work. This will always be in the minds of the Masses. Lawyer, Judge, Jury.
That is why this verdict is of no surprise to me.
I’ll let the rest of you debate the legality of it.[/quote]
Not a verdict.
Grand jury said there wasnt enough evidence to even go to trial. Bizarre.
[/quote]
Why Bizarre?
[/quote]
You don’t find it bizarre there’s a video of the whole incident and the reason for no trial was a lack of sufficient evidence?[/quote]
What did we see?
Yelling, they jump he ran got cornered picked up something hit. The other things are out of view.
[/quote]
Sure, and that’s why I could see him coming out on top in a trial.
But what we did see wasn’t enough to even warrant a trial?
Multiple lashes caught on tape.
Him hitting them while they’re on the ground with his coworkers trying to get him to stop with the “victims” out of view.