[quote]angry chicken wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
Mr. Obama just referred to this as workplace violence.
I will bet a great swath in Paris support this. Paris has turned into a multiculturalism shithole.
Australia, Canda, France… “Muslims Acting Badly”, coming to a theater near you. [/quote]
Well, Europeans are racist as hell. So, I expect the citizens to act out and burn down a few mosques over this. [/quote]
Good. Give them a taste of their own medicine. The “moderate” muslims are just as guilty as the crazy ones. They KNOW who the crazy ones are. But they turn a blind eye to the craziness. Next thing you know, people are getting killed.
We need to have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy towards radical RELIGION (christians blowing up abortion clinics are JUST as fucked up as muslims blowing shit up).
RELIGION is not a reason to KILL people. We need to move towards a more secular society and place significant restrictions on religion. [/quote]
I’ve been thinking this way recently but more specifically toward Islam (surprise). Since more than three quarters of the world is not Muslim we should all demand that parts of the Koran be changed, outlawed and of course no longer taught.
I really think the only way to stop terrorism though is if we had a real asshole of a POTUS who would politely explain to the Islam world that if there is another organized terrorist attack anywhere in the world X city would disappear from the map. The city could rotate. One month we could announce the nukes are aimed at Tehran, the next month it could be Kabul. A nice little monthly announcement like “People of Islam, this month the citizens of Istanbul are counting on you to put an end to terrorism”. Make all of Islam our unwilling allies in the fight against terror.
Sigh… one can fantasize, right?[/quote]
About mass murder? Why not?[/quote]
They’ve got NO problem whatsoever murdering us, why should we have any qualms about murdering them? And besides, in that scenario, they are WARNED what will happen. If they choose to do it anyway, that’s on them. Last time I checked, they kill us indiscriminately and without warning.
We nuked the shit out of Japan twice, and it ended WWII in the Pacific. Why all of a sudden do we have a problem doing the same thing?
Let us win your hearts and minds, or we’ll burn your damn huts down![/quote]
Committing genocide against millions of people in response to a terrorist attack is absurd and I know both you and On Edge are aware of that. The thought process is disturbing though.
[/quote]What I find disturbing is that we let these fuckers operate freely. Just because they hide in a country that is our “ally”. Fuck Pakistan - those fucker hid Bin Laden. Bomb the shit out of them. Fuck Iran, those fuckers are funding most of the terrorists around the world. Bomb the shit out of them. If these fuckers had a CONSEQUENCE for supporting terrorism and giving terrorists safe haven, then perhaps they would run out of money and places to train. If we made it so painful for the countries that allow this, we would eventually stamp that shit out. [quote]
The people of Tehran, Kabul, and Istanbul (cities referenced in OE’s post) have nothing to do with al-Qaeda in Yemen (people responsible for the Paris terrorism). Nuking a random city with a majority muslim population is not remotely close to what happened in WW2. Japan was in open war with us and directly responsible for PH, the people of Instanbul are not in open war with us nor are they responsible for the actions of al-Queda in Yemen. Further, if you think this scenario would result in the ending of terrorism you are sorely mistaken.
It’s utterly ridiculous to suggest nuking Istanbul in response to 12 people dying at the hands of an organization with absolutely no ties to that city. “They” cannot refer to a group of over 1 billion people. If we want to be tough guys, we use strategic attacks against hotbeds of terrorism. The USA has complicated relationships with the GCC countries and Pakistan and that limits us from fighting terrorism. To be clear, I am totally against these bullshit relationships and have for a long time disagreed with the USA playing nice with certain countries and not demanding more accountability b/c of the shaky alliances we have.
One billion people do not act as a homogeneous unit. Should we bomb a random ghetto in New Orleans b/c a black person in California murdered a white person? Should we blow up the Oklahoma City PD b/c a cop in NYC illegitimately murdered a civilian?[/quote]
Let’s use a similar analogy: if a member of the “G crew” from Greenmount and 33rd in Baltimore crossed a line and blew up a shop on the west side, any SANE person would probably not be walking out on the street near Greenmount and 33rd the next day because they would KNOW that the West side niggas would be turning that shit into a war zone. Notice, that DOESN’T HAPPEN very often, does it? Because there is a CONSEQUENCE. These terrorists don’t have CONSEQUENCES.
But we KNOW who funds them. We KNOW where they train. We KNOW who is in bed with them! But we do NOTHING. We smile and sell them airplanes, weapons and buy their oil. It’s fucking BULLSHIT.