Kerry's Record


Aid and comfort to the enemy: The Kerry record

http://kerry-04.org/patriot/record.php

“Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.” --George Washington

It’s no surprise that John Kerry has devoted so much time and energy questioning George W. Bush’s record as commander-in-chief. Nor is it any surprise that he recently launched a campaign calling on Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld to resign after a handful of military personnel humiliated al-Qa’ida terrorists in Abu Ghraib prison while attempting to obtain actionable intelligence about their plans to kill more of our troops.

These political attacks are just the latest round on Kerry’s long list of black-bag antics designed to undermine America’s military strength and resolve.

Kerry, who fancies himself a war hero, has spent much of his political career denigrating American military personnel and the nation they defend. But his anti-American actions preceded his first campaign for Congress – indeed, they were the platform from which he launched his political career.

Like his comrade “Hanoi Jane” Fonda and so many other Leftist protagonists from the Age of Aquarius, Kerry was a child of wealth and privilege. Today, he is the wealthiest member of Congress (the “F” stands for “Forbes,” after all) but don’t expect that to be a central theme of his “man of the people” campaign. (In fact, the top five wealthiest Senators are all Democrats.)

Kerry grew up hobnobbing with the Massachusetts Cape glitterati, a life of leisure including all the accoutrements – the best schools, the best vacation homes, the best yachts, etc. He socialized with the rich and famous, especially the Kennedy clan elites, where he was taken under the wing of his future patron saint, Teddy. He attempted to emulate John Kennedy’s PT-109 heroics by joining the Navy and using his connections to obtain an assignment for a short tour on a swiftboat in Vietnam. Kerry then went on to collect three Purple Hearts in just two months – all of dubious merit, but requisite for a ticket home to pursue his political aspirations.

Unlike John F. Kennedy, however, when John F. Kerry got home, there was no hero’s welcome. The nation was in turmoil over our continued role in Vietnam, the result of limited but well-publicized Leftist protests against the war. So Kerry, ever the opportunist, endeavored to become the Left’s most “useful idiot” (as Lenin called Western apologists for Soviet propaganda), collaborating with Fonda, et al., and leading protests accusing his “brethren” in Vietnam of all manner of atrocities.

Kerry was (and remains) an effective spokesperson for his Leftist cadre. His anti-war protest period culminated with his 1971 congressional testimony, after which he told the press, “There are all kinds of atrocities and I would have to say that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free-fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50-caliber machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which were our only weapon against people. I took part in search-and-destroy missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the laws of warfare. All of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions…”

Regarding the substance – and source – of Kerry’s claims, Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest-ranking intelligence officer ever to defect from the Soviet bloc, says “KGB priority number one at that time was to damage American power, judgment, and credibility. … As a spy chief and a general in the former Soviet satellite of Romania, I produced the very same vitriol Kerry repeated to the U.S. Congress almost word for word and planted it in leftist movements. KGB chairman Yuri Andropov managed our anti-Vietnam War operation. He often bragged about having damaged the U.S. foreign-policy consensus, poisoned domestic debate in the U.S., and built a credibility gap between America and European public opinion through our disinformation operations. Vietnam was, he once told me, ‘our most significant success’.”

As for the success of Kerry’s anti-democracy protests and his leadership of the VVAW and association with Fonda’s Winter Soldier Investigation, General Vo Nguyen Giap, Vietnam’s most decorated military leader, wrote in retrospect that if not for the disunity created by such stateside protesters, Hanoi would have ultimately surrendered.

But the consequences of Kerry’s actions should not stop with the fall of Saigon.

Kerry, by his own account, violated the UCMJ, the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. Code while serving as a Navy officer, and he further stands in violation of Article three, Section three of the U.S. Constitution.

Upon entering the Navy in 1966, John Kerry signed a six-year contract (plus a six-month extension during wartime) and an Officer Candidate contract for five years of active duty and active Naval Reserve. This indicates that Kerry was clearly a commissioned officer at the time of his 1970 meeting with NVA Communists in Paris – in direct violation of the UCMJ’s Article 104 part 904, and U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. 953. That meeting, and Kerry’s subsequent coddling of Communists while leading mass protests against our military in the year that followed, also place him in direct violation of our Constitution’s Article three, Section three, which defines treason as “giving aid and comfort” to the enemy in time of warfare. (As General Vo Nguyen Giap is his witness…)

Thus, we refer our readers to the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, which states, “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President … having previously taken an oath … to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

It is for this reason – for his record of giving aid and comfort to the enemy while a member of the U.S. Armed Forces in violation of his oath – that we insist John Kerry resign his seat in the U.S. Senate. He has dishonored his family, dishonored his state and dishonored our nation. He is not fit for public office at any level of government, much less, the highest office in the land. John Kerry should resign.

Above Right: Photograph of John Kerry meeting with Comrade Do Muoi, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam, in Vietnam, July 15-18, 1993. This photo is part of a tribute to John Kerry in the War Remnants Museum (formerly the “War Crimes Museum”) in Saigon.

(From http://FederalistPatriot.US/alexander/edition.asp?id=263.)

NOTE: Please join fellow Patriots and sign the petition demanding John Kerry’s resignation. Link to – http://PatriotPetitions.US/Kerry

Speaking of Jane Fonda, I saw a bumper sticker that said something like “Vote No to Kerry Fonda”. It was pretty funny. Lots of funny bumper stickers this political season.

JackZepplin
What year was that photo taken?

What year did the war in Vietnam end?

Any clue?

[quote]Lumpy wrote:

What year did the war in Vietnam end?

[/quote]

We were officially out by mid '74. Saigon fell to the north in late '75.

JackZepplin,

Great post.

I would like to add to this or sum up what Kerry and his service in Vietnam means to me. Any officer who actively seeks three purple hearts to tell the men he leads, “See ya, I’m outta here”, tells me all that I need to about the man and his leadership. You can throw out the lies about Cambodia and his betrayal in testifying about war crimes he never witnessed first-hand. I measure Kerry by the actions he took while being in an undesirable situation. Our true character will always surface when we are in situations we don’t want to be in. In my opinion, Kerry did not demonstrate what I want to see in a leader. What kind of leader leaves his men when he had no real excuse for leaving. His injuries were all superficial aka: bitch scratches. Grant it, nobody wants to be in a war with your life at risk, but to leave prematurely while you leave your brothers in arms behind while you pursue your political career is not what I consider serving honorably.

John Kerry used Vietnam as something to add to his resume, just like GW Bush joining the Guard. Kerry did not want to go to Vietnam. This is evident from the fact that Kerry didn’t join the Navy until after he found out that his application for student deferment was denied. He looked at the situation with intention of milking all the political benefits from serving in active duty while minimizing his exposure to any harm.

Now that he’s running for President, Kerry wants to cash in his war service paycheck only to find out that the check bounced.

Enough said.

[quote]Lumpy wrote:
JackZepplin
What year was that photo taken?

What year did the war in Vietnam end?

Any clue?[/quote]

Photograph of John Kerry meeting with Comrade Do Muoi, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam, in Vietnam, July 15-18, 1993. This photo is part of a tribute to John Kerry in the War Remnants Museum (formerly the “War Crimes Museum”) in Saigon.

The photo isn’t as relevant as his actual meeting in Paris in 1970.

“Upon entering the Navy in 1966, John Kerry signed a six-year contract (plus a six-month extension during wartime) and an Officer Candidate contract for five years of active duty and active Naval Reserve. This indicates that Kerry was clearly a commissioned officer at the time of his 1970 meeting with NVA Communists in Paris – in direct violation of the UCMJ’s Article 104 part 904, and U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. 953.”

Any clue?

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=3778

Nice breakdown of John Kerry’s treason.