Princeton Physicist: CO2 is Good

No guys, We the Jews actually are taking over the world.

If you’re generous to me now - maybe I’ll let you have a position of power in my future government.

All money orders can be sent to
Isaac Goldsteinmanwitzberg
123 Herschel Street
Jerusalem, Israel 16236

Oh you also forgot about how we’re smarter than the Goyim.

A fluff piece for sure, but an entertaining commentary on where we are today.

http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090304130950.aspx

LOL!!! I LOVE PWI!!! This thread took a distinct turn for the awesome.

[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
Let’s take your first claim of how every Obama financial appointee is a Joo, you say:

What is your evidence that the #1 person on your list, Timothy Geithner, is Jewish?

(As opposed to, raised Episcopalian and married in a United Church of Christ ceremony, and presently not observant of anything.)

Can you support it except from linking to some “Joos are the source of all evil and control the world” website?[/quote]

Okay, I’ll agree to take Geithner off the list for now – we’ll leave the other TWELVE.

But lets add in Obama’s LATEST appointment as of Tues…

Obama Officially Picks Julius Genachowski To Chair FCC

Julius Genachowski – He is married to Rachel Goslins, a documentary filmmaker. His parents are Eastern European Jews who survived the Holocaust. His cousin, Menachem Genack, is an Orthodox rabbi and the CEO of the Orthodox Union Kosher Division.

Son-of-a-Holocaust-Survivor! Thats a twofer!! (threefer?)

[quote]Or going to your third choice – your second is actually correct – what about Volcker?

With a Lutheran mother and an Episcopalian father, your claim seems unlikely and I’m pretty sure you can’t substantiate it except by linking to a nutjob site that in fact does not substantiate the claim.[/quote]

From the Israeli “nutjob site” Ynet…

Obama mulls naming Jewish economist secretary of treasury
Born to a Jewish family in New Jersey in 1927, Volcker attended Princeton University, Harvard and the London School of Economics. In January of 2008, he endorsed Barack Obama’s presidency bid and was his closest financial adviser
http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3619625,00.html

Given Obama’s latest appointment, I’d say I’m right on track.

I realize most people think my posts are anti-Semitic and that I hate Jews… I don’t. What I’m concerned about… and what many people HAVE BEEN concerned about, are that Zionist Jews do not have a loyalty to the country they live and are pursuing a selfish agenda that ends up destroying the countries they feed off of.

Multiply Howard Berman, by the number of leadership posts held by Jews in the US government and more AMERICANS might start to see the point.

Time to rethink
THE JERUSALEM POST - Jun. 23, 2008

Howard Berman likes to joke that he became a Zionist before he became a Democrat. Aside from the moment when he learned that president Franklin Delano Roosevelt had died, the 67-year-old congressman’s earliest political memory is of being at a rally at a Los Angeles stadium celebrating the birth of Israel in 1948.

Today, as the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, he’s in a position to do more than wave flags and cheer. He has the helm of one of the most powerful bodies shaping US foreign policy, and he says his decision to run for Congress and focus on international relations while in office was intimately connected to his Jewish background and ties to the Jewish state.

“Israel’s security and the US-Israeli relationship is for me an issue that shapes my whole agenda [in] Congress, and guides it,” he told The Jerusalem Post in a recent interview in his Capitol Hill office…

People like to say, “not all Jews are Zionists” – thats true – unfortunately, those Jews are not driving our foreign policy… case in point, the only time our own Congress can come to a unanimous agreement on practically ANYTHING is when it has to do with Jews and/or Israel.

House passes bill recognizing Israel’s right to defend itself
The bill, which was sponsored by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, passed by a vote of 390 to 5…

The bill was also passed amid growing concerns over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where more than 1 million Palestinians are without food and clean water, according to senior U.S. officials, citing reports from the World Food Program.

Both parties cheerlead still more loudly for Israel’s war

[quote][i]“Wars are the Jews’ harvests” is an ancient saying. Their predilection for the quartermaster’s department has been observed anciently and modernly.

Their interest being mostly in profits and not in national issues; their traditional loyalty being to the Jewish nation, rather than to any other nation; it is only natural that they should be found to be the merchants of goods and information in times of war–that is, the war profiteers and the spies. As the unbroken program is traced through the Revolutionary War, through the American Civil War, and through the Great War of recent occurrence, the only change observable is the increasing power and profit of the Jews."[/i][/quote]
– Henry Ford, 1921

I was always so easy to call Henry Ford an anti-Semitic bigot until you see exactly what he was talking about right before your very eyes.

[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
Let’s take your first claim of how every Obama financial appointee is a Joo, you say:

What is your evidence that the #1 person on your list, Timothy Geithner, is Jewish?

(As opposed to, raised Episcopalian and married in a United Church of Christ ceremony, and presently not observant of anything.)

Can you support it except from linking to some “Joos are the source of all evil and control the world” website?

Okay, I’ll agree to take Geithner off the list for now – we’ll leave the other TWELVE.[/quote]

How do you figure twelve?

I looked at only your first three and you were wrong on numbers one AND three.

At the very least you need to take Volcker off as well.

You need to research that better than you have above. As it happens, sometimes Jewish sources erroneously claim non-Jews as being Jews, just as you do (either for opposite reasons, or from simple error such as relying on sound of the name.) What, did you assume that if a source is Jewish it must be correct? How ironic: I doubt you would take, simply from a source being non-Jewish and nothing else, that it must be correct. If you would, you are gullible.

But that is not the real point: the real point is you are so bound and determined to blame Jews for everything that you are making non-Jews into Jews to accomplish it. Just ridiculous, and it shows how “tinged” your posting is. End of discussion (from my perspective.)

[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Admitidly there are probably too many factors to have a highly accurate model at this stage. One of the big issues for the model is that the oceans buffer C02 in the atmosphere, at higher temperatures they are able to dissolve more C02.

No, other way around. Solubilities of gases in water decrease with increasing temperature (opposite to the behavior of solids.)

As the oceans have warmed, from any cause, this has resulted in release of CO2.

CO2 levels – without man doing a thing – have been this high at the end of each interglacial period for about the last 400,000 years or so at least.

On the oceans then cooling with the following Ice Age, CO2 levels again drop. Presumably because the oceans can then dissolve much more CO2 when colder.

[/quote]

You sir are quite correct and I, a Chemistry Graduate, should be ashamed.

There is a good article about this here

http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2006/10/co2_acquittal.html

Very interesting article: I have just started reading it but that much is clear already. Has mechanisms that I did not know about and thus far is extremely solid.

Great recommendation. :slight_smile:

[quote]shookers wrote:

Oh you also forgot about how we’re smarter than the Goyim.
[/quote]

Nah… clearly its something else.

[quote]yorik wrote:
More CO2 means the plants will grow better, which means more O2, which is good for us.

It’s the circle of life.[/quote]

I’m not going to refute this myself. I suggest you get on google scholar in a public library with access to online journals in biology, climate and earth sciences. Research this topic youself and you may form a different conclusion.

[quote]lou21 wrote:
yorik wrote:
More CO2 means the plants will grow better, which means more O2, which is good for us.

It’s the circle of life.

I’m not going to refute this myself. I suggest you get on google scholar in a public library with access to online journals in biology, climate and earth sciences. Research this topic youself and you may form a different conclusion. [/quote]

True.

Most plants cannot use more than a certain amount of CO2.

Fortunately, that amount is much higher than 450ppm.

PROTOCOL No. 2
The GOYIM are not guided by practical use of unprejudiced historical observation, but by theoretical routine without any critical regard for consequent results. We need not, therefore, take any account of them - let them amuse themselves until the hour strikes, or live on hopes of new forms of enterprising pastime, or on the memories of all they have enjoyed. For them let that play the principal part which we have persuaded them to accept as the dictates of science (theory). It is with this object in view that we are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories. The intellectuals of the GOYIM will puff themselves up with their knowledges and without any logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available from science, which our AGENTUR specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want…

There could NOT POSSIBLY BE a finer example if I made it myself…

90 years on…

[quote][i]"Fifteen years ago William Fox [Fox Film Corporation] was in the clothes sponging business. He also is still in his early forties, is immensely wealthy, and one of the men who can pretty nearly determine what millions of movie fans shall think about certain fundamental things, what ideas and visions they shall entertain…

The propaganda side of the movies does not so directly declare itself to the public. That the movies are recognized as a tremendous propagandist institution is proved by the eagerness of all sorts of causes to enlist them."[/i][/quote]
– Henry Ford, 1921