[quote]bullpup wrote:
vroom wrote:
Granted you would never have to deal with the possibility of a hurricane and power outages that could last weeks as well as waiting hours in line for gasoline.
Yeah, natural disasters only happen to you personally. Nobody else has earthquakes, tornados, volcanoes or other disasters. Granted, Canada doesn’t have a history of them, but you never know what might happen.
Ahahahaha. A useful tool? You fool.
You are solving the entire worlds energy needs with this little “device” of yours. You are creating energy out of nothing, magic if you will, which nobody, throughout history, has ever achieved.
How can anyone ever have anything constructive to say compared to that? Just ignore the naysayers, build it, and less us know when you are the new utility company for the world.
Vroom,
Why do you have to question peoples ideas and be a dick about it?
If your going to act like an asshole at least spell, (let us) correctly.
It has nothing to do with magic. Take for example the alternator in your car. It uses the engine mechanical power to recharge the battery. I want to use a deep cycle battery which has a longer discharge rate than a astandard 12v battery, and use an alternator to charge the battery. The alternator is driven by a small electrical engine which has the correct sized pulley combination to supply the correct RPM to the alternator to produce efficent power with out being an excessive draw on the current produced.
Bullpup
[/quote]
you are missing the point. The alternator ALWAYS takes more energy to run than it supplies, this is stated by the second law of thermodynamics. Hence, even if you were to take all the electrical energy provided by the alternator and used to power a motor driving another alternator, the second alternator would produce less electrical energy than the first and so on.
Your proposed system could be thought of as a negative feedback loop, each cycle of alternator-motor-alternator diminishing energy until the steady state (zero energy output) is attained.