Yes I would. While they both had pretty faces, they are way too manly for me. And I hate it when girls have rough hands. It's as bad as terrible teeth for me.
The pic is more what I'm in to.
Really? very interesting. for teh record, that is a nice pic you put up of your type, I dont really see much of a difference between them, so i guess I go for both "types." I dont usually go for girls that are really skinny/lacking in curves. But when I was watching the youtube videos the last thing that came to my mind was the word "manly" - I definitely see a difference between their body-type and that of a professional female bodybuilder
The only similarity between the girls is a pretty face. THe girls in the video were too muscular for my tastes. Less bulk, similar muscle tone would be ideal.
And nice butts. Clearly we just disagree about what constitutes as muscular.
pffft. girls dont fart. nor do they poop. Everyone knows theres only one reason mother nature even gave them that hole...
I just dont see why lifting precludes any of those feminine things (long hair, finger and toenails painted, etc) - definitely dont think theyre a contradiction.
And yeah, most of the guys I lift with are guys, but most of the peopel I know dont lift, so chalk and chains just remind me of chalk and chains...