He actually lost support from Turkey right before going in. That was half of their battle, and that completely threw off their plans, and gave a place for people to go, regroup, and connect with Al-Qaeda.
I will say Bush should have been more aggressive then he was, and not ran a PC kind of war.
Now on to what everyone else said:
First - again quit with the lie crap. If you say he lied, that makes you a liar unless you can prove it. (Do I need to once again point out what is necessary to prove he lied, and the actual proof that he didn't?) No more hypocrisy, or just believing the bs just because you hate Bush.
Second, it hasn't been 5 years since he made the speech, or went to war with Iraq. He hasn't even been president that long. (5 years ago Clinton was still president. We are still 18 days away from his 5 year Anniversary.)
Please if anyone has a legitimate reason for being against the war, speak up. I actually do believe there are legitimate reasons to be against this war, or against war in general. But nobody wants to talk about this stuff and instead they just focus on gossip, rumors, innuendo, (say it slowly and you end up with a Spanish porn movie,) lies, myths, and propaganda.
Really I believe that about 80% of the people who are against the Iraq conflict would have been for it if Gore did it. (And about 20 to 25% of the people for it would be against it.) You cannot decide whether you like a presidents decisions and policies based solely on what party they belong to.