After reading some of the comments and some other forums it seems that people actually get ANGRY that he points out that the problem of abuse in the catholic church is a HOMOSEXUAL PROBLEM instead of a pedophile problem. A pedophile is attracted to a child below the age of puberty. Because the majority of boys abused were teenagers, it makes it a homosexual problem. It's still wrong, but lets place blame where it rightly belongs.
Going after pedophiles that don't exist and ignoring the homosexuals perpatrating these acts will not stop homosexual abuse of teen boys. A 14 or 15 y/o boy is too old for a pedophile, a pedo looks at them like a 'grandpa'. I know it's not politically correct to point out, but this abuse is the fault of homosexual priests. But people on the left get angry if you point that out, because pedophiles don't have a powerful lobby group like homosexuals do. So it's more convenient to call them 'pedophile priests'.
The mainstream media know what a pedophile is. But they are so committed to the gay agenda, that they will ignore facts, unless those facts make homosexuals look good or look like victims. They jump thru hoops to say that a man that sexually abuses 14-18 y/o young men are pedophiles. In fact, they even jump thru more hoops to insist that most of these priests are really HETEROSEXUAL. Anything to ignore reality. Calling yourself heterosexual doesn't matter if you indulge in homosexual behavior. You're just in denial.
And check these comments: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/03/31/catholic-league-boys-pubescent/
Some people are just so committed and invested in defending homosexuals in the Catholic Church that they lose all sense of logic and reality. They wouldn't care if 100% of thise abused were teen young men, somehow, in their mind, homosexuality is not to blame.