[quote]storey420 wrote:
[quote]Big Banana wrote:
[quote]Vegita wrote:
[quote]Big Banana wrote:
The Interior Department’s inspector general says the White House edited a drilling safety report in a way that made it falsely appear that scientists and experts supported the idea of the administration’s six-month ban on new drilling.
Sounds like the crap the IPCC does with AGW.
I thought this admin was not going to politicize science.[/quote]
Why would the white house even attempt something so ludicrous, cover ups like this could never happen in todays day and age. No reason to investigate it, since it is so unlikley anyone could get away with it, they obviously didn’t and wouldn’t try. Especially since we didn’t investigate them in the past for other cover up attempts. Are you serious with this crap?
V[/quote]
WTF?[/quote]
Me thinks he is being facetious because of all the “no way something was afoul on 9/11 with our government” people that immediately dismiss discussion on the matter.
You have to love the opening posts “only a few media outlets telling us the truth” with a link to Fox…hilarious.[/quote]
I am a little confused. Politico originally broke the story and they are one of the most fair news outlets. Of course it was political. It was to appease the left. Stopping deep water drilling wasnt necessarily going do anything for the spill that had just happened. Thats like driving down the street and then seeing a bad car accident. You dont stop driving just because you have seen an accident.