Is it better to use mag-10 for 2 weeks and then take some time off, or is 4 weeks more beneficial. What are the advantages of each method.
-Jason
Well, for these comparisons to be valid,
they have to be as close as possible,
certainly being equivalent for example
in amount of MAG-10 taken. It isn’t fair
to compare 4 weeks of use vs. 2 weeks of use.
So we’d be comparing 2 weeks on, 2 weeks off,
2 weeks on, 2 weeks off vs. 4 weeks on,
4 weeks off.
The difference wouldn’t be dramatic between
these, particularly if Clomid, or Tribex + Vitex, or Tribex + M are used in off weeks. (If not, recovery after the 4 week cycle could
in some cases be a little slow.) The advantages of the briefer system would be
that the body would have some time to re-ready itself for further growth in the second two weeks cycle, whereas in the four week plan it would have to go right into that immediately after already having grown a good bit; and there would be less time for losses in off weeks, only 2 weeks vs. 4 weeks.
The difference though would be much smaller that in the case of comparing, say, 2 on / 4 off to 8 on / 16 off; or 2 on / 2 off to 8 on / 8 off, etc.
Still, I don’t much favor neither-here-nor-there cycle lengths like 4 weeks. I’d say, either get the advantage of very fast recovery that you get from 2 weeks, or go all the way and do 6-8 weeks.