[quote]MODOK wrote:
giterdone wrote:
MODOK wrote:
giterdone wrote:
Vektarm wrote:
Think Im gonna try train every day like Arnold did when he did a 3-days split.. if I
m not mistaken. If this dont work out for me, I
ll just have to add some rest days
Training everyday is a path to nowhere due to lack of recovery time. Somewhere between 3 and 5 days a week typically works.
No its not. You guys need to come on over to Alpha and read some of the discussions that the vets have had/are having on this subject. FREQUENCY and progression ARE the keys to hypertrophy and strength. Come read some of our discussions if youâd like to know the reasons why.
I did recently check out that thread and there are some good points in there. I do agree that frequency and progression are the keys. I should have said training every day doesnât work for me. 5 days a week is that max I can do for any length of time otherwise I burn out and progression stops. I did HFT on two specific occasions and it was great for conditioning and body comp but not muscle gain(for me). Itâs likely my own fault since I have a hard time dialing back the intensity and really donât like doing reps over about 8 unless on an accessory movement. Generally, ramping up weight to a 3-6 rep max, three way split but I have considered switching to upper/lower for more frequency.
I am intrigued by Waterburyâs âNext Frontierâ or similar. A new job next month will mandate shorter training sessions and, fortunately, I will have more convenient gym access. So, perhaps an HFT approach will make logistical as well building muscle sense. Iâll reread the Alpha thread. Wonât be able to comment of course.
Now, what I am saying is NOT that a specific frequency (2,3,4 times per week) is the appropriate frequency for a particular person. Once weekly may in fact be more appropriate for a particular individual. What I am saying is, when you boil all the flesh off of any training program and look at what you are trying to accomplish⊠you are trying to stimulate, recover, and then get back in AS FAST AS POSSIBLE to do it again. Can you recover, get back in, and better your performance in one or more parameters in 2 days? 3 days? 7 days? Well, obviously you would grow in strength and size faster the more you get in the gym. But, that is predicated on the fact that you are actually recovering enough to progress. Some folks canât. Some can.
Bottom line is, doing what works optimally for YOU. Only you can really answer that question through knowing your bodyâs capacity. Waterbury, CT, Poliquin, Dante, MeâŠwe all respond to different frequencies optimally. Find your optimal frequency, and you will grow optimally.[/quote]
Agree completely.
You have sparked a thought though. I diligently use a log book to track progression (strength, reps etc.) and to âkeep scoreâ. But, I have not specifically adjusted training frequency in order to track impacts on recovery. As you said, is it 2, 5, 7? Recovery assessment has been more through intuition and feel which works but can be an inefficient path. Perhaps some quantification is in order. Of course, I might find out that Iâm right where I should be.
Obviously, if the optimal training freq is a day shorter than I âfeelâ it is then that is pile of additional training/recovery cycles per year.
There is also the variable of intensity. I generally donât leave many reps in the hole on a set. Not to failure generally but the last one is the last clean one I can get. I suspect that I can up the frequency if I leave one or two in the hole to help avoid burnout. Not sure at this point. Then, of course, you have to find the balance between frequency and reduced intensity.
Thanks for the prompt.