[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
orion wrote:
No private company would have ever figured out how to build streets, power grids or a postal system.
Thank god the best and wisest among us are magically drawn to work for the government to better the living conditions of all human kind out of pure love for their fellow men.
I don’t trust private companies–I trust the government even less but the government can only charge so much for its services. A measly 40% of my income goes to taxes. Thats a bargain considering I live in a halfway decent country. I guarantee you if I had to pay a private company for all the services provided by the government it would be far more expensive.
Do you seriously think every service should be privatized?[/quote]
No, in some cases it makes no sense.
You either defend a country as a whole or you dont. Whenever you cannot exlude people fron services they do not pay for it might be a public good that needs to be financed by communitiy or it won
t be financed at all.
Those are rare though.
In some cases I am even for the state to finance some things though it is not necessary, like education and health care until you are 18.
However, I do not want the state to provide those services, give them vouchers and let competition work its magic.
The idea that government can only charge you so much is true, once you are dead they are usually done with you. Until then they can allways take more.
Why you think that governments provide goods cheaper than the private sector I do not really know, there might be cases though where you could not afford something and yet the government gives it to you.
If you look closely you might still be able to see the blood, sweat and tears
of the person the government took it from.
In the long run it is more complicated than that, because public spending allmost allways means misallocation of resources i.e stunted economic growth.
If all the money re-distributed in the US, and that includes subsidies and corporate welfare in general, only slows down economic growth by 1-2% a year the consequences are enormous after a decent amount of time.
11,03^50=4,38
11,04^50=1,71
1*1,05^50=11,47
So if redistribution means an average growth rate of only 3% rather than 5 %
people 50 years from now could have been 3 times better off than they would be.