I’m reading Thib’s latest article. In it, he differentiates between training for strength and training for size. Many articles do. The frequency of learned authors making a distinction between the two, combined with my complete ignorance of their differences, makes me feel more inferior than I’m accustomed to.
The skinny: What’s the difference between training for size and training for strength? I figure that the two cannot be mutually exclusive - that is to say, by training for size, aren’t you also training for strength? Or if not, is it possible that someone without size could be stronger than Mr. Staypuft?
(sidenote: Most everyone that asks for info/advice on the boards is 5’10" or 5’11"…conspiracy?)