Lately I have been always pausing my bench. I was curious to hear how you guys train? It's a bit odd because now it seems that I am just as strong, or even a bit stronger at paused bench versus touch and go.
What do you guys think are the advantage to each style?
The body stores the 'stretch reflex' energy for several seconds (up to 5 in advanced lifters) during a pause. When done correctly the advantage is developing 'over-coming static' strength. Both styles have there place IMO. Nothing odd about a body adapting to the work.
well in paused style not boucing of the sternum is easy, using proper stretch reflex like some people can do is FOR ME hard. and well on paused i bench less weight ( yet im working on it,my technique improved so it is getting easier)
I've started integrating wide grip paused bench into my program. I feel like it helps me a lot off my chest. I do a 3 second pause at the bottom, so that way when I get into a competition, the 1 second pause won't be as bad.
Funny, I am much the same now. As a sprinter I'm not too concerned with bench technique but decided to start pausing them recently to make them "harder" and thus improve my regular bench. Well, after a few weeks of paused benches I was past my old bounching bench max and couldn't wait to see how much my bouncing bench had improved.
When I tested it I was surprised that I lifted LESS than my paused bench. So overall I now lift a little more using a paused bench. It just feels more powerful for me and I have more control over the barbell.
People make too big a deal about "I train touch and go, but am worried how I will fare in a competition where it is paused". For my 1st meet, I started pausing benches about 3 weeks out, just to get used to holding the bar at my chest till I hear the "press" command.
Guess what - my best gym touch and go was 300, at the competition I got an EASY 295 and missed 305 half-way through because I got stapled before that by a 405 (misload). All I'm saying is people seem to make too big of a deal between touch-and-go and paused benches.
If you have problems staying tight at the bottom, it is a good idea to incorporate some long-pause work. I rotate paused work in to teach me to be more explosive off my chest so I can blast through my sticking point.
After a few years of experimenting, this is what I found works for me. If I am working below 80%, I will do more reps and this will be a slow touch n go. Anything above 80% will be singles, maybe doubles but will be pause n press. Now, if the new weight crushes me at the bottom, then I work on doing dead position bench press for reps or if I get beat up half way up, then I do 2bd press for reps to train the weakness.
In short, experiment based on your training cycle relative to your next meet and adjust accordingly.
obviously if you are competing, paused benching is a must. i typically start to work on my paused bench when i'm about a month out from competition. i feel that it isn't needed in normal training though. i prefer to train my bench through supramaximal lifts such as reverse band, chains, boards and foam presses. with me i get stronger by overloading the top end. it strengthens the triceps and gets my CNS primed for heavier weights.
with that said, i feel that many people really don't know how to properly pause a bench. they typically just lower the bar and attempt to hold the bar in place by flexing the pecs. this only works until you reach a certain weight. It isn't until you learn to activate the lats that you can efficiently control a really heavy weigth at the chest and then have the strength to press it to arm's length. when i pause a bench i've learned to use my lats to a point that the weight actually feels almost weightless at the chest. my lats are doing pretty much all the work at the bottom and that leaves the pecs fresh to initiate the press.
Thanks for all the great replies. That is a really good point meat. After training paused bench 3 times a week for the past year I am fairly confident in my ability to stay extremely tight with the bar at the chest. I think I will start adding in some overloading movements now because once I start pressing with maximal weights it certainly starts to feel like holding a house in my hands.... especially once I put on a tight shirt.
when i unrack the weight, i immidiately start flexing my lats as hard as i can. as i row the weight down i continue to flex my lats as hard as i can. the lower the bar gets the more of a bind i put the lats on. as the bar reaches my chest i'm bending the bar by forcing the meat of the outsides of my hands into the bar while flexing as hard as i can.
once the bar is at my chest, there's so much tension built up in my lats that the bar has no where to go but up. i actually have to limit the amount of lat tension i use or the bar won't reach my chest. it's not until about 405 that i can start really using all of that tension that builds up.
Bump this thread because I'm interested in an update from any of the above posters on your thoughts after experimenting with paused vs touch-and-go in the last two years.
And a question I'm not sure has been addressed: Is there any disadvantage to always training paused? I.e. are there times when touch-and-go will result in better long-term gains than always doing paused? The argument I could see is touch-and-go serving as a poor-man's overloaded lockout, but obviously bands will do a better job of that.
Im the same way, sticking point was always off the chest. The past few months ive been adding in a lot of paused pressing for sets of 3s and 5s. As well as brought my grip in closer and Ive been seeing a lot of improvement.