T Nation

Top Scientist Advocates Mass Culling....


#1


Top Scientist Advocates Mass Culling 90% Of Human Population
http://story.seguingazette.com/drudge.html

Fellow professors and scientists applause and roar approval at elite's twisted and genocidal population control agenda.

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 3 2006

A top scientist gave a speech to the Texas Academy of Science last month in which he advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the population through the airborne ebola virus. Dr. Eric R. Pianka's chilling comments, and their enthusiastic reception again underscore the elite's agenda to enact horrifying measures of population control.

Pianka's speech was ordered to be kept off the record before it began as cameras were turned away and hundreds of students, scientists and professors sat in attendance.

Saying the public was not ready to hear the information presented, Pianka began by exclaiming, ?We're no better than bacteria!?, as he jumped into a doomsday malthusian rant about overpopulation destroying the earth.

Standing in front of a slide of human skulls, Pianka gleefully advocated airborne ebola as his preferred method of exterminating the necessary 90% of humans, choosing it over AIDS because of its faster kill period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.

Pianka then cited the Peak Oil fraud as another reason to initiate global genocide. ?And the fossil fuels are running out,? he said, ?so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.?

Later, the scientist welcomed the potential devastation of bird flu and spoke glowingly of China's enforced one child policy, before zestfully commenting, ?We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.?

At the end of Pianka's speech the audience erupted not to a chorus of boos and hisses but to a raucous reception of applause and cheers as audience members clammered to get close to the scientist to ask him follow up questions. Pianka was later presented with a distinguished scientist award by the Academy. Pianka is no crackpot. He has given lectures to prestigious universities worldwide.

One horrified observer was able to make notes on the speech and our gratitude goes to Forrest M. Mims for bringing this sickening display to the attention of the world.

Throughout history elites have invented justification for barbaric practices as a cover for their true agenda of absolute power and control over populations. Up until the 19th century, the transatlantic slave trade was justified by saying that the practice was biblical and therefore morally redeemable in nature, despite the fact that no such bible passage exists.

From 1932 until 1972, the Tuskegee Study Group http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_study
deliberately infected poor black communities in Alabama with syphilis without their consent and withheld treatment as the diseased rampaged through the town killing families.

Pianka's doomsday warning of the population bomb, for which Mims claims he presented no evidence whatsoever, is complete pseudo-science. Populations in developed countries are declining and only in third world countries is it expanding dramatically. Industrialization itself levels out population trends and even despite this world population models routinely show that the earth's population will level out at 9 billion in 2050


and slowly decline after that. "The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050," states a United Nations report.

Conservation International's own study
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=%5CCulture%5Carchive%5C200212%5CCUL20021206b.html
revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.

Think about the magnitude of Pianka's statements. He wants to kill nine out of every ten members of your family and he wants to kill them in one of the most painful and agonizing ways imaginable.

If Pianka, or 'The Lizard Man' as he likes to be called, is so vehement in the necessity of culling the human population will he step forward to be the first one in line? Will he sacrifice his children for the so-called greater good of the planet? We somehow doubt it.

Will the students who so enthusiastically greeted his ideas go home and kill themselves for the cause if it is so righteous?

It was noted how Pianka presented his argument with the kind of glee that you would see in a demented serial killer before dispatching his victim. This is an attitude we have encountered again and again. To discuss killing 90% of the world's population via a horrific plague is sick enough within itself but you would at least expect its advocates to be serious and sober in their approach to the subject. The opposite seems to be the case, where the subject is aired in a context of lighthearted lip-smacking and hand-rubbing as if the individual was about to sink his teeth into a T-bone steak.

This window gives us a clear view of exactly why these deranged bastards encompass this ideology. They love death and their lives are motivated by dark influences very different to you or I.

In the 21st century the elite are concerned that from over 6 billion people might spring a new elite to challenge their stranglehold on the reigns of power. This is one reason for desire to cull the population down to a manageable level. Another is control over the behavior of the existing serfs and herding them like cattle into the slaughter house.

As we have documented, members of the elite are quite open in their feverish lust to commit mass murder and ethnic cleansing. In the foreword to his biography If I Were An Animal, Prince Philip wrote, "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."

National Security Memo 200, dated April 24, 1974, and titled "Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests," says:

"Dr. Henry Kissinger proposed in his memorandum to the NSC that "depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World." He quoted reasons of national security, and because `the U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries ... Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and to the economic interests of U.S."

Kissinger prepared a depopulation manifesto for President Jimmy Carter called 'Global 2000' which detailed using food as a weapon to depopulate the third world.

One of the most chilling admissions of deadly intent came from the lips of the late Jacques Cousteau, the sainted environmental icon. In an interview with the UNESCO Courier for November 1991 the famed oceanographer said:

"The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics ? it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangaladeshes. The damage is directly linked to consumption. Our society is turning toward more and needless consumption. It is a vicious circle that I compare to cancer...."

"This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it?s just as bad not to say it."

The Melbourne Age


reported on recently uncovered documents detailing Nobel Peace Prize winning microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet's plan to help the Australian government develop biological weapons for use against Indonesia and other "overpopulated" countries of South-East Asia.

Pianka's ideology is in the same league as Hitler, Pol Pot, and the rest of history's despots who advocated mass extermination and had the temerity to dress it up in a 'noble' Straussian facade. We demand that he be investigated for openly calling for mass murder and in the meantime we encourage everyone to click here pianka@mail.utexas.edu
and e mail Pianka, enabling him to receive your feedback about his wish to kill your children..


#2

from the looks of it he will be gone pretty soon anyways. it would seem he is trying to leave behind some legacy for other fucktards to follow, that way the looney tune will carry on. what a nutjob.as for his "followers", even star wars has groopies. imo they are all a little bit dumber having heard his speech. now if you'll excuse me i have a meeting with the evil lord xenu on galacton 5 (random spaceship launching sounds here...).


#3

Its to make room for the lizard people. See the clue in the guy's nickname?

It has long been rumored that Bush is a space-alien lizard person and that he is simply following their agenda. Simply go to www.asksollog.com for all the true facts.


#4

The guy never advocated killing 90% of the world's population. He did say for some reason he thinks it's likely there is another mass extinction coming up.

The guy who wrote that article is a creationist and is mischaracterizing what Pianka said. The guy is controversial, and perhaps intentionally so, but he didn't advocate genocide.

Nice case of faux outrage against something that didn't actually happen.

Link:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/4/3/11409/90836


#5

Outright libel/slander is more like it. The guy almost certainly isn't amassing guns, bioweapons, and followers on his compound in TX. He's merely talking numbers, data, and logic. How he feels, his emotions, and his moral objections to the culling are another issue altogether. People don't always like to hear about it, but things like herd immunity and perverse effects of vaccination do need be explored and considered when talking about a pandemic and whether you should get a flu shot or not.

It's a fascinating topic:


#6

hey we found his #1 groupie. wohooo, whoda thunk it.


#7

Most of the problems of the world can be solved by allowing people who consume more than they produce to die.


#8

Here's more:

http://story.seguingazette.com/drudge.html

So let me get this straight:

A. Some guy who's an expert in reptile evolution espouses the idea that the human race is too dense and numerous to survive at the scale that we are at now.

B. He thinks that disease, most likely some kind of Ebola virus, is gonna pimp slap us all back into the stone age.

C. A bunch of uber-nerds who take this crackpot's classes think he is some kind of genius.

Where's the problem?

That he's receiving distinguished service awards for achievement? Sorry, but this freak knows more and has published more about desert lizard ecology and evolution than any other man alive. So some other scientists give him some "wow you're really still a virgin, why am I not surprised" award. Big deal.

Is it the fact that he draws parallels between the ecology of reptiles and their population density to the ecology of humans and their population density? Big deal. He's wrong. We are sentient animals, and capable of altering our environment in ways that no other animal, notably the rather quite-specialized desert lizard, is capable of. This is apples and oranges.

So we are getting all verklempt over the fact that some scientist has a wrong opinion about something? Pardon me while I have a panic attack about this.

The only thing I got out of this article you posted, jlesk, is the fact that some people who write internet articles have WAYYY too much time on their hands. Kinda like me. :slightly_smiling:


#9

The two people who are writing articles about him "advocating" this (Dembski, Mims) are creationists. Calm down.


#10

Hold on a second...with all the cranky, hostile, impatient bastards on this site, no one is in favor of a cull?


#11

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/4/73558/61378

Evidently the scientists who work with this guy are now getting death threats because of false stories like the original post.


#12

I wonder if those are good 'ole heartfelt Christian death threats.


#13

Of course I am but the Ebola virus is too random. Don't want to lose the hot chicks.


#14

I am.
I am willing to start immediately. All politicians and lawyers report to door 1. All fat spandex wearing women, door 2. That should be a good start. We'll deal with car salesman, drug company heads, and squat rack curlers tomorrow.


#15

Excellent point. You...return to your home and enjoy new spacious living area. Your right thinking has earned you life. lol.


#16

Groupie? Oh yeah? You'll see. When they have to send Bruce Willis back from the future to save us all from a virus that's nearly wiped out the human race, or when Dustin Hoffman has to stop both a deadly virus and the White House from killing a small town or...or when all of the entire country is turned into zombies and we're stuck in a Danny Boylesque hell, you'll see...

(Okay, maybe I liked my epidemiology classes a little too much and maybe I have seen too many movies.)