T Nation

Thirty-Five Thousand Calories

I was flipping through this Canadian magazine called “Urban Fitness” just to see how retarded it would be when I found this gem in one of the articles:

“Thirty-five thousand calories equals one pound of fat…”

I swear this is what it said. And it was written by a Doctor.

I think he was off by a zero. Maybe he misread it somewhere.

From a search on Google for “calories equals one pound” I got this:

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2005-10,GGLD:en&q="calories+equals+one+pound

Most sources say 3500 or 4000.

Unless he’s saying that you have to burn off 10 times as many calories to lose a pound of fat, or something like that.

[quote]JPBear wrote:
I was flipping through this Canadian magazine called “Urban Fitness” just to see how retarded it would be when I found this gem in one of the articles:

“Thirty-five thousand calories equals one pound of fat…”

I swear this is what it said. And it was written by a Doctor.
[/quote]

Either he was off by a zero, or it was a misprint. 3500 is the number I have always heard. As in, “they say…” whoever the hell “they” are. LOL

|/ 3Toes

If you want to be technically correct, when we conventionally talk about calories we really mean kilo-calories. So, 3500 “calories” is really 3500 kilo-calories or 3,500,000 calories. So, did they add a zero or leave off 2 zeros?

[quote]rmetz wrote:
If you want to be technically correct, when we conventionally talk about calories we really mean kilo-calories. So, 3500 “calories” is really 3500 kilo-calories or 3,500,000 calories. So, did they add a zero or leave off 2 zeros?[/quote]

Hmm?

[quote]rmetz wrote:
If you want to be technically correct, when we conventionally talk about calories we really mean kilo-calories. So, 3500 “calories” is really 3500 kilo-calories or 3,500,000 calories. So, did they add a zero or leave off 2 zeros?[/quote]

Hah, I was thinking the same thing but didn’t respond because I thought it would be too nerdy. I applaud your courage.

[quote]DemiAjax wrote:
rmetz wrote:
If you want to be technically correct, when we conventionally talk about calories we really mean kilo-calories. So, 3500 “calories” is really 3500 kilo-calories or 3,500,000 calories. So, did they add a zero or leave off 2 zeros?

Hah, I was thinking the same thing but didn’t respond because I thought it would be too nerdy. I applaud your courage.[/quote]

oh, that was such a nerdy post. now go back to your world of warcraft and math equations and rock em sock em robots.

I wish thirty five thousand calories = a pound,lol.