The Ultimate PCT

I would think there is a difference between a standard birth control dose in a female and a gram a week of test or 600 MG of tren or a stack of whatever over a number of weeks in a male.

With reagrds to the Pergonal it is LH/FSH that works similar to HCG, and increases sperm count back to normal if the cycle impacts. Lupron stops dead in its tracks estrogen or test production after 3 or 4 weeks, but during the 1st week it can increase test levels 50 % and it works in the pituitary. Upon removal of the Lupron everything returns to normal. The protocol uses Lupron only in the first and last weeks.

HCG increases intra testicular test so you have every area of the HPTA covered. The cabergoline reduces prolactin levels, another potential barrier to recovery especially if you use Nandrolene derrivatives. Foremsatne is an AI so I would think any AI would work, but I would think Aromasin would be better since it is rapidly absorbed and reached peak concentration within 24 hours.

As an over 40 male that cycles and that started off with low test levels before AAS, I am interested in anything that aids the recovery process.

So for intense long-duration cycle’s this is what we need eh? Well getting rid of progesterones, prolactins is made quite easy by using a slow gentle taper of testosterone, allowing all other compounds to be purged from the body before tapering off. No need to add more compounds into the mix, that have their own side effects that you will have to contend with - ie. bromocriptine is a very dangerous drug to be using.

And of course the use of a case study isn’t going to win anyone points in a peer-reviewed research study, as we have no baseline, no exact dosages used, no other information of what other medications the subject tried, and no long-term analysis of how he fared following cessation of hcg therapy. I am quit sure his recovery wasn’t perfect following cessation of the hcg therapy and the end of the study.

Who would want to be dependant on hcg therapy for testosterone production anyway? -to be held hostage for your weekly shot of gonadotrophins -pretty lame!

Meanwhile others are tapering off with testostorone, never knowing what it is like to loose their libido, and oblivious to the meaning ‘test crash’ as this never occurs on a test taper when done correctly, which I might add can be completed in just six weeks time depending of course on what compounds you used while on cycle which may lengthen pct by more than double.

So what of these fancy compounds?

well progonal is composed of menotrophins - compounds that basically are a mix of LH and FSH. -So basically you are adding more hormones to the mix to solve your problems, only at a different level. Much like the dangers I have noted of hcg use causing desensitization of the leydig receptors, which pretty much makes it not only useless, but harfull to your pct. you need to be really carefull when using this drug. It really should only be used under supervision of a specialist, and only for the peroid of time it was designed for, as it is just a short term drug designed for causing ovulation/ spermatogenesis. It does not cause sustained testosterone production amd unless you are looking to pass a few good sized wads, that is all it will do in the short term, and may like hcg be quite harmfull to the eugonadic male in the long term.

And Leupron… while here is what my pocket PC drug guide states:

An LH-RH agonist that occupies pitutitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors and desensitizes them; inhibits gonadotropin secretion when given continuously, leading to an intial increase, then profound decrease in LH and FSH levels…

This drug btw is cleared by the FDA for the below use:

Advanced prostatic Cancer, palliation, alternative to orchiectomy or estrogen therapy:

Basically what this is saying is we’ll give you leupron to fuck your hpta up so no more dht will convert causing more prostatic hypertrophy because your testes won’t be producing any testosterone once where through with em!

and you think that the use of this drug is wise for pct?? ha!

There are some female uses for the drug too, but I won’t get into them, as I just made my point.

So in the end your recommending that we use HCG and menotrophins, which clearly will cause desensitization of both the leydig receptors, and can alter the functioning of communication between the hypothalmus and the pituatary as well, as the menotrophin also include FSH. Then of course we’ll also use Leupron which I just showed royally fucks with the pituatary - so badly they use it as an alternative to an orchiectomy (that means nut removal or snipping the balls off for all you lay out there).

So in fact this protocol that you posted will actually do the exact opposite of what you hope to achieve.

And you my friend have balls to question my credentials? (actually I’ll take that one back you definitely wouldn’t have any balls if you used your protocol you are planning on using)

Anyways, I may not know every drug in the book however I do know how to open the book and interpret data, that is what we do, no one has every drug and dosing protocol committed to memory.

Sorry about being rude and crude, however, There are a lot individuals on this website, that know no better, and would try using some of these compounds or this protocol, and that is very irresponsible to allow that to happen.

And that is why I continue to fight every poster who post their B.S. pct protocols that use this or that compound.

The whole reason for pct is to avoid a hormone crash people! You do this by gradually weaning off the large amounts of hormones you have been using, and back onto just plain ol testosterone - the hormone your body actually secretes…

If you do this, you’ll keep most of your gain and you won’t experience mood swings, excessive acne, loss of libido, hormone crash - dramatic weight loss, and the sudden and pervasive need to get right back on your next cycle!

For some reason somewhere along the road people have been convinced that stopping steroids cold turkey is the best method. - You do that with a lot of other medical therapies - especially equivalent to the dosages you are using with AAS, and you’ll either drop dead, or come close! But somehow this idea still pervades.

The argument of course is, we’ll use this drug or that drug instead to artificially restart natural testosterone production. - You have lay people presribing more complicated drug therapies than I have ever seen even a pHD use in the hospital for christ sakes! and the assumption is that it’ll work? when absolutely no research has been done in this are using those drugs in combination for the purpose of restoring suppression of the hpta by AAS use.

But will it cause an eventual smooth recovery, or are you just bandaiding yourself from aas use untill your next cycle. I say the later, because if you stop the hcg and all the other compounds used, you’ll wake up one day soon after, and little willy will be dead, and than you’ll be depressed, and then gains will litterally melt off your body while fat% steadily increases, hell you might even get late onset gyno to boot. Sollution? get back on your next cycle, start taking your antiE’s again and keep you mouth shut.

It seems some of these pct protocols wth the amount of different drugs being used are becoming more expencive than the actual cycle’s themselves, yet they don’t work worth a dam.

anyways enough said, I’m sure all got my points, and I hope noone now will even consider trying the above posted protocol.
P-22

I’m just wondering - Does tapering test cure cancer? Will it make julian fries? How about gas mileage? If I taper my test, will I see better than the 17mpg I am currently getting?

If it sounds to good to be true - it usually is.

P22 -What about testicular atrophy? I think that is the biggest concern (at least MY biggest concern) when going on long, heavy cycles. I am not that concerned with fertility issues, just the psycological aspects of seeing my testicles in an unhealthy state. What if one chose to self-administer testosterone therapy with heavy and light doses for a long period of time? How do you avoid increasingly shrunken balls?

Is your stance that we can achieve 100% HPTA revcovery with restored testicle size from the test taper? Wouldn’t this recovery rate depend on age (i.e. the older you are, the slower the recovery and possibly decreased testicle size)?? Do you think that NO ONE at any age should use HCG, even for intermittent use during the cycle?

And I ask all of this respectfully because I would like your thoughts on the topic.

P22:

Look, I am not adovocating anything, putting information out there for scrutiny, discussion and comment. If someone can’t think crtically about this topic or using these drugs then they shouldn’t be here. I am not questioing that your knowledgable.

Like I said, do the research and read the studies. I have no doubt you are passionate about the taper method, but what do you say to a guy who never recovers regardless of the PCT or taper method…oh well you are just fucked, you can’t say any method is 100 % for sure. There are numerous studies in the literature, just look at them. Check out Michael Scally, MD over at MESO. This specfic protocol was reccomended to a guy who never recovered and still had small testicular size months later.

And as far as the self adminstartion of drugs, what’s the difference between pergonal and Test, Tren, T3, clen, etc,etc They are all self adminstered.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
I’m just wondering - Does tapering test cure cancer? Will it make julian fries? How about gas mileage? If I taper my test, will I see better than the 17mpg I am currently getting?

If it sounds to good to be true - it usually is. [/quote]

No, it just works. P-22 has no interest here other than to share his info and help people. It’s not like he’s learning anything from us.

I will say I tried doing a taper and pct close to what he advises and it was the best I’ve ever felt coming off. This does not mean it will work for everyone. Some people may respond to clomid and hcg, others may not. Some people may recover great with taper and adex only, others may not.

I’ve said this before but we are all walking subjects. The only way you are gonna know if something works for you is to TRY IT. Personally, I’ll stick with the adex and taper. The only place for hcg IMO is in the middle of a very long cycle to “supersize your balls”

Monopoly

[quote]Monopoly19 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
I’m just wondering - Does tapering test cure cancer? Will it make julian fries? How about gas mileage? If I taper my test, will I see better than the 17mpg I am currently getting?

If it sounds to good to be true - it usually is.

No, it just works. P-22 has no interest here other than to share his info and help people. It’s not like he’s learning anything from us.

I will say I tried doing a taper and pct close to what he advises and it was the best I’ve ever felt coming off. This does not mean it will work for everyone. Some people may respond to clomid and hcg, others may not. Some people may recover great with taper and adex only, others may not.

I’ve said this before but we are all walking subjects. The only way you are gonna know if something works for you is to TRY IT. Personally, I’ll stick with the adex and taper. The only place for hcg IMO is in the middle of a very long cycle to “supersize your balls”

Monopoly[/quote]

I am not against a taper in some instances.

But I don’t think it will cure everything that can happen when coming off an extended cycle.

If you like tapering - knock yourself out. But I reserve the right to crack wise about it.

If I remember correctly from reading his approach elsewhere, P22’s approach to PCT is there isn’t any (technically). You would use an AI throughout your cycle, taper off on the test while tapering on the AI and then nolva is optional at the VERY end.

P22, if this is wrong, please correct me.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
I’m just wondering - Does tapering test cure cancer? Will it make julian fries? How about gas mileage? If I taper my test, will I see better than the 17mpg I am currently getting?

If it sounds to good to be true - it usually is. [/quote]

Sarcasm isn’t debate, it is a falacy, and accomplishes nothing.

If you really are against this, analyse the science and physiology behind it, instead of ridicule -This internet BB comunity reminds me of much the same cirmcumstances like the Catholic Church vs Galileo. Many are all too quick to ridicule simple science, yet would much rather believe in implausable ideas brought forth by the so called ‘authorities’ in this subject area, of the internet boards - just because they are ‘authorities’.
pretty lame.

[quote]lattimus wrote:
P22 -What about testicular atrophy? I think that is the biggest concern (at least MY biggest concern) when going on long, heavy cycles. I am not that concerned with fertility issues, just the physiological aspects of seeing my testicles in an unhealthy state. What if one chose to self-administer testosterone therapy with heavy and light doses for a long period of time? How do you avoid increasingly shrunken balls?

Is your stance that we can achieve 100% HPTA recovery with restored testicle size from the test taper? Wouldn’t this recovery rate depend on age (i.e. the older you are, the slower the recovery and possibly decreased testicle size)?? Do you think that NO ONE at any age should use HCG, even for intermittent use during the cycle?

And I ask all of this respectfully because I would like your thoughts on the topic.

[/quote]

Good question. Testicular atrophy is not something you need to be afraid of. It is simply what any muscle, gland or node appears like when it is not at work.

When the testes are not being activated by LH secretion from your pituitary to manufacture sperm, their metabolic demands decrease, and with that blood supply decreases as well. Blood supply increases or decreases to any area of the body via vasodilatation, which I believe is triggered by an increase in acidosis - the by-product of tissue metabolism. You can see this quit evidently in your muscles when you train arms you get a pump and your arms can increase in diameter sometimes as much as 1/2 inch to a full inch.

Lymph nodes increase in size during times of infection - same process - an increase in tissue metabolism means greater blood flow needs, which causes increase in size, and temperature - due both to increased blood flow and metabolism.

Atrophy has nothing to do with tissue down grade or tissue remodelling. So don’t have fear that you are doing damage to your testicles while you are on steroids.

Actually by not subjecting them to any LH or minimal amounts you will cause the leydig receptors to actually be MORE sensitive to your own natural secretion of LH from the pituitary, so once you taper off, initially your test levels should be HIGHER for a bit until your body regulates itself and returns to homeostasis.

As for using hcg, it will only work for the weeks you use it during the long cycle, and after that for a long period of time your testicles will return to being as small or even smaller.

The reason for this, is that studies of using testosterone for a male contraceptive have shown that it does not cause azoospermia in all men and definitely not at lower dosages (below 100mg test E per week) (Masumoto, 1990) (Armory, et al., 2001). That is the reason test E has never been used for a contraceptive. The fact is that even while you are on cycle your body is still active to a certain degree secreting LH. Depending on what steroid(s) you are using i.e. the degree of androgenicity will govern to what degree your hpta is still active (Winters,et al., 1979).
Studies have actually proved this, where using 50mg of test enanthate on a weekly basis in normal men only lowered FSH and LH secretion by 50% when compared to the placebo group, and larger doses of 100mg and 300mg per week though found to be suppressive, were equally inconsistent in causing azoospermia (Masumoto, 1990) (Armory, et al., 2001). Doses of 25mg of testosterone enanthate had no effect on FSH or LH levels or sperm production compared with placebo (Masumoto, 1990).

A good example of this that many of you have probably found is if you are on cycle using lighter compounds such as Primo, Anavar, smaller amounts of Test, Equipoise, Winstrol, Tbol, Dbol, e.t.c. your testicles may not be in a fully atrophied state, however, if you switch your drugs to nandrolone, or trenbolone, you will see further shrinkage in the testes. This anecdotal evidence clearly backs the above findings: Some steroids are more suppressive and cause greater shutdown! That of course I why I recommend waiting six weeks at a static 100mg of test E per week, to clear these steroids and their derivatives from your body before gradually decreasing the testosterone dose.

So you see that is why it’s not that productive at anytime to use HCG.

Further there is evidence to show that using an anti-E concurrently with 100 mg of test, so that E is prevented from binding with the receptors in the Hypothalamus prevents any shutdown of sperm production at all (Naftolin, et al., 1973)(Winters, et al., 1979). Highly anabolic agents such as halo, e.t.c at these low doses where shown to do similarly without even the use of an anti E, as these drugs do not aromatize (Winters, et al., 1979).

So, if you want to regain testicular size during a cycle, simply plan in your cycle to remove the highly androgenic compounds from your body, switching to compounds that have a higher anabolic ratio and concurrently using clomid, and you will ultimately improve the testicular size.

Absolutely no HCG is needed to accomplish this!

So anyways to wrap up, as I said before, the hpta is not fully suppressed when using testosterone in weekly doses below 100 mg of Enathate per week, if used concurrently with an anti E. The goal is to keep estrogen in physiologically normal, or slightly lower than normal levels, or else use clomid or nolva, which antagonize the ER. By doing this you can actually stave off 100% of hpta suppression, while still using 100 mg of test Enathate a week according to the literature.

If you wait the six week using 100mg of T enathate per week while allowing other non testosterone compounds you may have used during your cycle to clear- (which I might add is like a natural taper - allowing your body to slowly come down from being on say greater than 1 gram of AAS per week) and then you begin to taper your dose from 100 mg per week using an anti E concurrently to ensure the hpta is capable of being active…

Each week as you continue to taper down your dose of test, the amount of FSH/LH secreted in your pituitary will increase, and the amount of natural test will increase as well. As LH increases, Sperm production increases, which increases the metabolic demands of the testes, and blood flow then dramatically increases to the area in response to metabolic demands causing hypertrophy - and usually some discomfort - actually some have had to use ice to the area to relieve the discomfort!

Tapering off your anti-E:
As you get down to the 50-25mg per week range you should be tapering off the anti-E as it will no longer be needed to keep your hpta active according to the literature. This is necessary to do on another front, as you need to up-regulate the ER so that it isn’t super sensitive to small amounts of estrogen when you finally go off causing late-onset gyno, and even complete shut down… Chronic use of anti-E?s causes decreases in estrogen exposure, and just like any drug, if you don?t use it for a while, your body becomes more sensitive to it?s effects. This means you need to slowly reacclimatize your ER to normal amounts of estrogen aromatisation. You accomplish this by tapering your anti-E so that you should be completely off it by the week you are using only 25mg, which research shows causes absolutely no hpta suppression whatsoever.

So anyways, by the end of the taper you can see now how the testes will have had plenty of time to increase in size. If you didn’t use hcg, you can also see how the testes would have been almost hyper-responsive to your own natural LH production when it actually ‘kicked into gear’.

And of course the six week waiting period on 100mg of test E is important, as it doesn’t matter what pct method you use, if you still have levels of AAS in your system and their by products, it doesn?t matter what you do, you can’t recover yet until they are cleared.

So basically the taper does the following:

-It gives your body time to adjust from being exposed to a lot of hormones to being just on normal physiological amounts vs the cold turkey approach

-It allows non-testosterone AAS to clear your body, while you still maintain your size and your libido and workout intensity doesn’t have to change

-It allows time for the testes to respond, and your body to adjust back to normal amounts of testosterone.

-At no time does the level of testosterone in your body ever fall bellow physiological norms.

-At no time should you expect to lose your libido

-Best of all you can count the entire taper period as being ‘off steroids’ as technically you are in the normal physiological range of blood testosterone levels for the entire time you are doing the six week taper. (not the six week waiting period).
Therefore you can return to another cycle in six-week time- and expect good gains.
.
References
Armory, J., Anawalt, B., Bremner, W., Matsumoto, A., (2001) Daily Testosterone and Gonadotropin Levels are Simmilar in Azoospermic and Nonazoospermic Normal Men Administered Weekly Testosterone: Implications for Male Contraceptive Development. Journal of Andrology, 22(6). 1053-1060

Matsumoto, A., (1990) Effects of chronic Testosterone Administration in Normal Men: Safety and Efficacy of High Dosage Testosterone and Parallel Dose-Dependant Suppression of Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, and Sperm Production*. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 70(1). 282-287

Naftolin, F., Judd, H., Yen, S., (1973) Pulsatile Patterns of Gonadotropins and Testosterone in Man: The Effects of Clomiphene With and Without Testosterone. Journal of Clincal Endocrinology and Metabolism, (36)1. 285-

Winters, S., Janick, J., Loriaux, L., Sherrins, J., (1979) Studies of Sex Steroids in the Feedback Control of Gonadotropin Concentrations in Men. II. Use of Estrogen Antagonist Clomiphene Citrate*. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 48(1). 222-234

[quote]HouseOfAtlas wrote:
If I remember correctly from reading his approach elsewhere, P22’s approach to PCT is there isn’t any (technically). You would use an AI throughout your cycle, taper off on the test while tapering on the AI and then nolva is optional at the VERY end.

P22, if this is wrong, please correct me.[/quote]

yep, I believe the above post will explain everything in vivid detail :slight_smile:

p-22

[quote]Monopoly19 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
I’m just wondering - Does tapering test cure cancer? Will it make julian fries? How about gas mileage? If I taper my test, will I see better than the 17mpg I am currently getting?

If it sounds to good to be true - it usually is.

No, it just works. P-22 has no interest here other than to share his info and help people. It’s not like he’s learning anything from us.

I will say I tried doing a taper and pct close to what he advises and it was the best I’ve ever felt coming off. This does not mean it will work for everyone. Some people may respond to clomid and hcg, others may not. Some people may recover great with taper and adex only, others may not.

I’ve said this before but we are all walking subjects. The only way you are gonna know if something works for you is to TRY IT. Personally, I’ll stick with the adex and taper. The only place for hcg IMO is in the middle of a very long cycle to “supersize your balls”

Monopoly[/quote]

Thanks, a good example of someone who kept an open mind and was rewarded.

A for if it will cure everyone. The answer is YES. If you were eugonadic before you started your cycle, it will return you to that state!

If you were eugonadic before you started cyling, and have have a few rotten pct’s, it will still return you to your prior state you were in before your first cycle - albiet add a few years to your life :)as test production does drop as we age…

If you were not eugonadic, it will return you to whatever state you were in previously, in which case I recomend saying on the 75-100mg dose per week, with a concurent anti E, as apposted to goning completely off between cycles

[quote]Prisoner#22 wrote:
Sarcasm isn’t debate, it is a falacy, and accomplishes nothing.

If you really are against this, analyse the science and physiology behind it, instead of ridicule -This internet BB comunity reminds me of much the same cirmcumstances like the Catholic Church vs Galileo. Many are all too quick to ridicule simple science, yet would much rather believe in implausable ideas brought forth by the so called ‘authorities’ in this subject area, of the internet boards - just because they are ‘authorities’.
pretty lame.[/quote]

If you would have read my next post, you would know that i agree to some extent with a taper in certain instances.

What is your sample size? Is there a real study out there that supports your position that tapering is the answer in every situation?

If this is just an idea - then it is opinion until you have more than anecdotal evidence to back it up.

There are proven PCT protocols out there that should not be thrown away and discredited just because you say so.

As for my sarcasm - you’d do better to tell the wind to stop blowing. It’s not going to happen.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Prisoner#22 wrote:
Sarcasm isn’t debate, it is a falacy, and accomplishes nothing.

If you really are against this, analyse the science and physiology behind it, instead of ridicule -This internet BB comunity reminds me of much the same cirmcumstances like the Catholic Church vs Galileo. Many are all too quick to ridicule simple science, yet would much rather believe in implausable ideas brought forth by the so called ‘authorities’ in this subject area, of the internet boards - just because they are ‘authorities’.
pretty lame.

If you would have read my next post, you would know that i agree to some extent with a taper in certain instances.

What is your sample size? Is there a real study out there that supports your position that tapering is the answer in every situation?

If this is just an idea - then it is opinion until you have more than anecdotal evidence to back it up.

There are proven PCT protocols out there that should not be thrown away and discredited just because you say so.

As for my sarcasm - you’d do better to tell the wind to stop blowing. It’s not going to happen.

[/quote]

You can scroll back up and have a look at my reponse. You’ll see it has been edited to include refferences all in standard APA format. Enjoy…:slight_smile:

As for these pct protocols, the problem is they havn’t been proven, the designers neglect the laws of basic human physiology and they frankly don’t work, their too complicated, and too easy to screw up. As I said before, I have seen more complicated pct protocols on BB forums being prescribed then drug regimines in the hospital.

I’ve said it before, I am not profiting off helping anybody. The material I just laid out was a selfless act of help, and you all would be foolish not to take the above info very seriously when planning your next cycle.

[quote]Prisoner#22 wrote:
I’ve said it before, I am not profiting off helping anybody. The material I just laid out was a selfless act of help, and you all would be foolish not to take the above info very seriously when planning your next cycle.
[/quote]

I swear - between yours and hooker’s ego’s where is there any room for actual honest debate?

But with that said, I appreciate you including the references.

It probably appears that I would stand to profit from PCT protocols that require several drugs concurrently.

However, money is not made on nolva. It is not made on the clomid, either. More of our sales are from AI’s taken during cycles to reduce the chances of gyno. But leading them all are the cialis, viagra, t3 and clen. None of these have anything to do with PCT. I guess the argument could be made that cialis and viagra are part of PCT, but I would disagree. But in any event, my opinions on this are not driven by the dollar.

I am not a big HCG fan either.

My issue with your tapering is what it has always been. Longer estered test will naturally taper. I believe you even refer to that fact in your recently started thread. And I think anything you do beyond the natural taper of said esters is counter productive.

You are on one end of the PCT spectrum. Hooker is on the other.

I think the truth lies in the middle.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Prisoner#22 wrote:
My issue with your tapering is what it has always been. Longer estered test will naturally taper. I believe you even refer to that fact in your recently started thread. And I think anything you do beyond the natural taper of said esters is counter productive.

[/quote]

Yes, to a point, however if you are using lets just say nandrolone decanoate concurently, you need the six week waiting period before you can even bother comming off anyway, you can never hope to recover with any significant amount of nandrolone in your system. I think we both understand and agree on this. After that, you then can come off as quick or a slow as you like. I prefer slower than quicker.

As for the steroids tapering themselves, The problem with that is peak blood levels of testosterone from the enanthate ester occur by day 2 following an injection and quickly trail off after that.

That is why people on Hrt injections of cypionate or enanthate every 14 days find that by the second week their blood levels are lagging. This populaton much rather prefers weekly injections, and would optimally do best on injections twice per week.

I prefer being able to accurately control/ regulate just the amount of exogenous test that is in the body at a give time. Using test propinate as opposed to enanthate and injecting small amounts 3 times per week, is probably even more advantagous to keeping stable blood levels.

I like the idea of test taper.

P22- Thank you for the reply,and the time and effort put into it.

wow thank god I found this, I just started a cycle a few days ago. And pct is of absolute most importance to me. I’ve been reading pct protocol for years, and what P22 says really does sound like a good idea. I thought I had broken down all this pct protocol in to a perfect science.

But now I won’t be using HCG during the cycle, which I was skeptical about, along with a lot of other stuff.

? for P22, well what I’m wondering now is, how do they know the testes are functioning again when you still have exogenous test in your system. A blood test will show that you have a certain amount in your system. So how can you tell what your endogenous test is at? or even FSH and LH for that matter?

wow thank god I found this, I just started a cycle a few days ago. And pct is of absolute most importance to me. I’ve been reading pct protocol for years, and what P22 says really does sound like a good idea. I thought I had broken down all this pct protocol in to a perfect science. But now I won’t be using HCG during the cycle, which I was skeptical about, along with a lot of other stuff.

? for P22, well what I’m wondering now is, how do they know the testes are functioning again when you still have exogenous test in your system. A blood test will show that you have a certain amount in your system. So how can you tell what your endogenous test is at? or even FSH and LH for that matter?