.
.
[quote]PGA wrote:
We read your post and…[/quote]
Comb that mutherfucka’
How long have you been training seriously?? Maybe that lack of commitment is holding you lift numbers back? Otherwise WTF is the point of this?
I guess I’m a liberal then, because I love T-Nation.
The other day, a mod on another board tried to say that the macronutrient ratios dont matter as far as fat gain and its all calories. I linked him to a JB article on T-Nation and the guy responded by calling JB a dumbass lol.
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Hey, Lou!
I didn’t quite get the point either…
But what the Hell! Here’s a pic of Jamie anyway!
Mufasa[/quote]
OK guys, I think it’s time we made Jamie our mascot…would someone kindly intergrate her into a new skin for the site?
I think we’ve all had a drink or two and tried to post.
It never really works out like we think it should have.
Having said that,
Despite the, somewhat, ADHD nature of the post I didn’t think it was THAT obtuse…
In compariosn to some of the idiocy that passes for argument over on the politics board, I actually thought it was quite coherent.
[quote]iscariot wrote:
Despite the, somewhat, ADHD nature of the post I didn’t think it was THAT obtuse…
In compariosn to some of the idiocy that passes for argument over on the politics board, I actually thought it was quite coherent.[/quote]
Thank you!
It’s just every time we get an artcle that’s inconsistent with Chad Waterbury’s philosiphies, the author gets flamed. Where do we get off telling Jason Ferruggia or Ellington Darden that they’re full of shit?
There’s no balance of opinion around here anymore. We hate everything Weider stands for so much that if his magazines say that deadlifts are a good back builder, we’ll say that it’s not and flame anybody who says they got good back results from the deadlift. Instead of being the “Think Tank” we’re so proud of, we’re perpetually playing devil’s advocate with ourselves.
Now I’m REALLY confused, Lou!
A common criticism I’ve seen over the years is that this crowd tends to play “favorites”. And if any thing is “contrary” to their philosophy, they get flamed.
That thinking confuses the Hell outa’ me, and I’ll use the most recent examples of Chad and JB.
Chad and JB get their asses reamed more than any other authors on this site! Not only here, but other sites as well.
And they are “favorites”???
Am I missing something here? If so, I will be the FIRST to apologize…
Mufasa
It could just be that those people are more vocal (well in a text type of way) and they seem to drown out all the others. A lot of the time people don’t take the time to speak up about something they agree with, but they are much more likely to do so when something that is controversial is mentioned.
^
[quote]Lou Garu wrote:
It’s just every time we get an artcle that’s inconsistent with Chad Waterbury’s philosiphies, the author gets flamed. Where do we get off telling Jason Ferruggia or Ellington Darden that they’re full of shit?
There’s no balance of opinion around here anymore. [/quote]
Oh, that’s what you mean? That’s not new around here. There’s disciples of every training methodology on this site. They are always going to stick up for their guru.
Until you try a routine, it’s best to keep your mouth shut. When you experience a routine that sucks ass (aka …), you still keep your mouth shut. Do what works for you. Experiment, but stick to the stuff that gets you results.
I know what works for me. I’ve tried different styles. No trainer knows how my body responds to training so how can they offer me a better routine?
They can’t.
[quote]BigRagoo wrote:
rrjc5488 wrote:
That Bauer asshole is a real pain in the ass around here.
Haha, that’s what I thought this thread would be about.[/quote]
Man, you guys just can’t stop thinking about me huh?
I’m flattered…
Shugs, JB, Chad, Dave, Alwyn, EC, Dan, Lonnie, Mike, Charles, Dave, CT, Tony, Tim, Ellington, et. al at their Computer…
One thing DOES happen though…
Authors (I’m sure to their dismay), will be PLACED into “camps” by the members because of one or two articles they have written. (The most RECENT split has been the “Total Body/Split” Camps).
MOST OF THE AUTHORS ON THIS SITE ARE NOT IN “CAMPS” OTHER THAN THE “CAMP” OF THE PARTICULAR PERSON THEY MAY BE TRAINING AT THE MOMENT!
Despite every effort to let members know they are NOT “married” to any one philosophy, it never fails; some hack will “flame” one of the authors because he is “contradicting” his previous stance or is “changing his philosophy”.
READ MY LIPS! THE AUTHORS ON THIS SITE TRAIN A MYRIAD OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT GOALS!
Their “philosophy” is therefore CLIENT SPECIFIC!
Mufasa
(Actually, most of the Authors listed above are more pissed when their favorite Porn site membership expires…but you get the point!)
Mufasa
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
(Actually, most of the Authors listed above are more pissed when their favorite Porn site membership expires…but you get the point!)
Mufasa[/quote]
Is that Tia Bella?