And we can’t even ask why someone resists men armed with guns. We have to accept that violent criminals like Jacob Blake are low IQ scum who should be allowed to set into motion the events that end their lives. The cops do not get any benefit of the doubt.
You live in fantasy land. The cops are called to deal with someone they know is a criminal. He fights them. He doesn’t respond to tasers or guns pointed at him. He goes to a vehicle with children in it. Let’s stop there. Cops are human beings. They are not supermen. They want to live. They don’t want a criminal to kill them or or anyone else. What should these HUMAN beings do? Wait until it’s too late? Give a violent criminal who is acting irrationally a chance? You want to place on cops a standard they can’t meet, because they are humans, while not putting a standard on black men that they should meet (especially since it’s their lives at stake).
And there is zero proof that any of these killings were racially motivated. Hence, a reason why I brought up behaviors that create the potential for a shooting. If police kill black men because they are black, then why do they kill white men?
So we’ve established that the narrative of cops hunting down black men is false.
We’ve established that the narrative of cops killing black men because they are black is false.
We’ve established that responding to the police with violence increases the odds you will get hurt or killed.
So who really has the problem? The cops or the criminals? And if the cops do have a problem it’s with dealing with violent criminals, not how they deal with black people.
I don’t know about anyone else, but when I see Jacob Blake or Rayshard Brooks, I don’t see “men” who represent their race but criminals. Then again, I’m not a racist.