There is a comment from the head of the FPA (Fitness Professionals Association)
Mr. Kalashnikov @kalashnikovdm (https://www.instagram.com/kalashnikovdm/)
The comment is hear https://www.instagram.com/p/B5PtbaQqikE/
The FPA is one of the largest and most respected educational center in Russia for the personal fitness trainers.
FPA made a post about the report according to which each person is genetically unique and requires a special approach. The reaction to exercises is very individual and must be taken into account. Moreover, science should be the basis on which the personal trainer imposes his experience.
The user @har.mih asked about the conclusions of the report, because they are not in the post
@my.sport.life commented: once again I’m convinced that C. Thibaudeau’s approach to training on neurotypes has logic :)))
and @kalashnikovdm answered (translated very close to the original): no, Thibaudeau’s ideas - stupidity, wild simplification of neurophysiology and far-fetched. The person neurological profile is not described by simple options, as he described it. And there is no simple, easily explainable and universal connection of the neurotype with the reaction to physical exercises.
Can you comment it hear or their (on FPA instagram page)
Addition - Commentary on the statement that the connection between the system of neurotypes and physiological adaptations (reactions) to physical activity is unscientific. (please do not confuse, we are not talking about motivation, personal feelings, only physiological reactions of the body)