The Fappening

Someone sent me a link on my phone a few days ago. Not knowing what it was I clicked on it and it was all those nude celebrity photos. I don’t see what the big deal is about guys being super turned on by them. :Most of those chicks are nothing special. It’s just blown out of proportion because they are celebrities. I still stand by my statements that Kate Upton doesn’t have that great of a body, just huge boobs and a pretty face.

Also, I don’t think the FBI or the authorities would get involved if this happened to just a normal woman. Didn’t the guy who hacked Scarlett Johannson’s phone get like 10 years in prison?

[quote]CLINK wrote:

[quote]batman730 wrote:
Meh, jerking it to a nude scene or porno that someone knowingly and willingly produced for distribution is one thing.

This is more like hiding in the bushes outside someone’s window and jerking it while they do their private business.

Seems really uncool and like a huge invasion of privacy.

I’m out, personally.[/quote]

Same here.
[/quote]

+1. I did look at a few of them though - that’s the issue with the internet; even if you think it’s wrong, doing something just by clicking a link is oh so easy.

Over half these chicks are probably happy about it. I must be old, because looking at the pictures, I couldn’t name one of the girls, except maybe jen. lawrence. Even after hearing the name, I don’t know who most are.

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Someone sent me a link on my phone a few days ago. Not knowing what it was I clicked on it and it was all those nude celebrity photos. I don’t see what the big deal is about guys being super turned on by them. :Most of those chicks are nothing special. It’s just blown out of proportion because they are celebrities. I still stand by my statements that Kate Upton doesn’t have that great of a body, just huge boobs and a pretty face.
[/quote]

I said it in a previous thread: A lot of the fawning and explosion of celebrity worship is indirectly the result of the obesity crisis. If a guys lives in the midwest surrounded by chubby’s is it really surprising he can’t help but idolize a thin attractive girl under 25?

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Yogi wrote:

[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:

[quote]Yogi wrote:
yeah it’s a bit gross looking at someone’s private photos.

Still kinda wish I’d seen them though…[/quote]

Given the young age of many of them, I would not be surprised if some of these people in the pictures are under 18 at the time.

Good way to go to prison forever.[/quote]

on a slightly related note: my sister works in a secondary school. Long story short, some 12 year old chick sent a boy in her class a video of her touching herself. Suprise surprise, the video got sent to pretty much everyone in the school.

Now all hell has broken loose because a load of kids have basically been distributing child pornography![/quote]

Delete the word “basically” and your sentence would be correct.
[/quote]

What are the ramifications of a minor distributing child porn?? I have always wondered that. Is the girl that made it and sent it just as guilty as those that passed it along?

[quote]1 Man Island wrote:
Over half these chicks are probably happy about it. I must be old, because looking at the pictures, I couldn’t name one of the girls, except maybe jen. lawrence. Even after hearing the name, I don’t know who most are.[/quote]

Same except I knew Upton as well because she’s dating Verlander and I watch baseball

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Yogi wrote:

[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:

[quote]Yogi wrote:
yeah it’s a bit gross looking at someone’s private photos.

Still kinda wish I’d seen them though…[/quote]

Given the young age of many of them, I would not be surprised if some of these people in the pictures are under 18 at the time.

Good way to go to prison forever.[/quote]

on a slightly related note: my sister works in a secondary school. Long story short, some 12 year old chick sent a boy in her class a video of her touching herself. Suprise surprise, the video got sent to pretty much everyone in the school.

Now all hell has broken loose because a load of kids have basically been distributing child pornography![/quote]

Delete the word “basically” and your sentence would be correct.
[/quote]

What are the ramifications of a minor distributing child porn?? I have always wondered that. Is the girl that made it and sent it just as guilty as those that passed it along?
[/quote]

Those are complicated questions. The bottom line is, if the act meets the elements of the crime, its a crime. Here are some relevant statutes in WA and there is also a list of permitted and barred defenses.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9.68A&full=true#9.68A.110

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Yogi wrote:

[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:

[quote]Yogi wrote:
yeah it’s a bit gross looking at someone’s private photos.

Still kinda wish I’d seen them though…[/quote]

Given the young age of many of them, I would not be surprised if some of these people in the pictures are under 18 at the time.

Good way to go to prison forever.[/quote]

on a slightly related note: my sister works in a secondary school. Long story short, some 12 year old chick sent a boy in her class a video of her touching herself. Suprise surprise, the video got sent to pretty much everyone in the school.

Now all hell has broken loose because a load of kids have basically been distributing child pornography![/quote]

Delete the word “basically” and your sentence would be correct.
[/quote]

What are the ramifications of a minor distributing child porn?? I have always wondered that. Is the girl that made it and sent it just as guilty as those that passed it along?
[/quote]

Those are complicated questions. The bottom line is, if the act meets the elements of the crime, its a crime. Here are some relevant statutes in WA and there is also a list of permitted and barred defenses.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9.68A&full=true#9.68A.110

[/quote]

well if you’re under 16 in this country they don’t really do all that much to you, so I’m not sure how it’ll play out.

I didn’t ever hear how it turned out, I’ll ask my sis.

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Didn’t the guy who hacked Scarlett Johannson’s phone get like 10 years in prison?[/quote]
Well that was the most publicized piece of what he did. He was really just a hacker in general though. He had done a bunch of illegal wiretapping and remote access stuff and had like 50 people’s personal info on his computer. Obviously the papers all just reported about the Scar Jo nudies he leaked, but there was also a bunch of straight up identity theft info that he’d stolen.

I don’t know if all that would typically get you 10 years or not, but anyway…

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:
You bring up an interesting point. I would say that the harm to the actresses is already done; no amount of people looking at the pics increases the harm caused by the initial invasion of privacy.

I think it’s up to the viewer now to determine how looking at the pics dovetails with their own morality.[/quote]

Okay to dovetail this with a post you made in another thread:

At what point in the conversation about this, in your opinion do we start “blaming the victim”? (If at all.)

Does telling people that nudie photos and sexting isn’t the best idea if you’d be upset if they ended up on the internet “blame the victim”.

Take the perv’s in public taking “upskirts”. Does mentioning that wearing a skirt that goes below the knee, or being very cautious where and how you sit in public blame the victim?

[quote]batman730 wrote:
Meh, jerking it to a nude scene or porno that someone knowingly and willingly produced for distribution is one thing.

This is more like hiding in the bushes outside someone’s window and jerking it while they do their private business.

Seems really uncool and like a huge invasion of privacy.

I’m out, personally.[/quote]

Ya, this is how I feel too.

[quote]batman730 wrote:
Meh, jerking it to a nude scene or porno that someone knowingly and willingly produced for distribution is one thing.

This is more like hiding in the bushes outside someone’s window and jerking it while they do their private business.

Seems really uncool and like a huge invasion of privacy.

I’m out, personally.[/quote]

Yup.

If Jennifer Lawrence willingly released a porn video I’d watch it in a heart-beat.

These? Nope. Not even going to touch them.

These people CHOOSE to be stared at, on giant screens, by millions of people. They get paid MILLIONS to be in the public lime light. They crave attention.

They willingly took pictures of themselves, naked. Why? who were they planning on showing these pictures to? Their mom? Their friends?

They would all be fine with it if it was under contract and there was millions of dollars to be made.

…said the guy playing devils advocate :wink:

[quote]carbiduis wrote:
…said the guy playing devils advocate ;)[/quote]
I was about to say. I didn’t think you were that crazy lol.

Polaroid pictures FTW

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

At what point in the conversation about this, in your opinion do we start “blaming the victim”? (If at all.

[/quote]

Never… doing so would just discourage such behavior, and I don’t have any daughters.

I wonder if this will cause a shift in how people think of the internet. I think its best to think of it as a public place and behave accordingly. Even if some parts are more secluded than others, you can still be seen/overheard without your knowledge.

As an aside, they say one of the reasons fewer women are sunbathing topless in Europe is because they don’t want their diddies showing up on social media… but then we do get to see Kate Upton’s, so you have to take the rough with the smooth.

[quote]batman730 wrote:
Meh, jerking it to a nude scene or porno that someone knowingly and willingly produced for distribution is one thing.

This is more like hiding in the bushes outside someone’s window and jerking it while they do their private business.

Seems really uncool and like a huge invasion of privacy.

I’m out, personally.[/quote]
Wow welcome to the internet does your mom know your here?

Hahaha I am heterosexual and don’t even care!! I really don’t. Inner evolution right there xoxoxox

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

on a slightly related note: my sister works in a secondary school. Long story short, some 12 year old chick sent a boy in her class a video of her touching herself. Suprise surprise, the video got sent to pretty much everyone in the school.

[/quote]

How about: don’t film yourself when you touch yourself. lol!