To clarify, I didn’t recommend that course of action. I have superiors who determined some forum policies before I ever found out I was becoming Forum Director. I’m not trying to pass the buck, just understand that this isn’t me saying the 20 character minimum is staying put, but it is me saying the forum rules are going to be enforced.
[quote=“mbdix, post:29, topic:217565”]
To read that statement about possible suspension is a major blow to my confidence and appreciation of this site.[/quote]
…
[quote=“DBasler, post:31, topic:217565”]
An overreaction would be if someone were to actually be suspended for breaking this silly rule.[/quote]
Suspensions are a potential Mod/Admin action after multiple offenses, as I said before. Having those posts simply deleted is the immediate action.
So basically, the forum policy says you can’t submit posts with fewer than 20 characters. Someone tries getting around that with a loophole (underscore, dashes, typing “must by 20 characters”, whatever), that post gets deleted, which is the Mod equivalent of saying “Hey, no, don’t do that.”
If the member continues to break that rule, it’s the equivalent of them saying, “Yeah well, I decided I’m just gonna keep doing that.” There’s no other way to interpret that behavior. At which point, the Mod/Admin can and very likely will put the member in time out with a one-week suspension, which is their version of saying, “I said don’t do that, but you did. Now you’re going to stop doing everything for a while.”
I understand that no one likes being penalized or reprimanded, but I really can’t see how that very straightforward “if, then”/cause and effect is unreasonable, discouraging, or an overreaction.
You guys can call it a silly rule if you want, but it’s a very easy to follow silly rule.