Nice job @mnben87 !!
If I get hit by a truck I am glad and hope these graphs help somebody.
A couple of observations and questions:
- Is the TT assay LCMS? Pretty high so LCMS the way to go on something this high. The 150.00 looks fishy so is the assay out of range?
- Gear over the stated concentration?
- This is an extremely high approx. peak level on 100 mg of test ester E3.5D (but it reads as though you tested 2 weeks after the protocol switch so you are still in flux):
Here would be a rough median response estimate:
| mean | 1846 | 1844 |
|---|---|---|
| peak | 2537 | 2083 |
| trough | 1099 | 1492 |
| peak/mean variation | 37% | 13% |
| E7D | E3.5D |
Also here is a handy table to convert between approx peak/mean/trough assuming 4.5 day elimination half life and 8 hr apparent absorption half life:
So let’s say you caught the peak (24-32 hr typically for tmax)
Take your 4327 peak / 1.1 = 3932 ng/dl mean. That is an extraordinary mean TT for 200 mg/week which leads me to think either your gear is overdosed or you have a immunoassay result that may not be accurate and you needed to wait 4 weeks until your PK profile stabilized on new protocol).
Regardless, @mnben87 is right. Drop down to 80 mg/week (twice weekly injections and get your trough right before next injection after 4 weeks) assuming your gear is at the stated concentration.
** and of course everything he said health wise **
GET the BP down.