[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]zraw wrote:
Hi guys! This isnt really a thread to ask anyone any question but more to show what some people could expect from running a cycle of test + tren
[/quote]
I’m lost where it says you dropped 24lbs of fat. You said the scale weight stayed the same and didnt quote any bodyfat measurements.
Your right I dont know what your goals are but…
If you were running a cutting cycle, where’s the clen and/or fat burners?
If you were bulking, why weren’t you eating enough to gain any weight?
The right drugs will allow you gain some muscle under sub optimal conditions. In the right conditions with those same drugs you’ll gain a lot more. I’m really not being a dick, if you take my advice you might get more of what you want out of your next cycle. And you’ve gotta hold on to those gains too. Don’t be so sensitive dude!
[/quote]
Perhaps he merely wanted to “recomp”? I would be pretty pleased with a 24 pound fat loss while maintaining bodyweight. There are a good deal of guys who no longer subscribe to the bulk/cut ideas of bodybuilding. Not saying I am one of them, but obviously zraw is. Just because the scale is not moving up does not mean you aren’t getting more muscular.
In your defense, he didn’t say how much bodyfat he had lost (as far as I could tell) but your posts come off as incredibly douchey nonetheless.
[/quote]
If that’s the case, why don’t you write the “non-douchey” childrens version of constructive criticism. And if you aren’t putting on lean body mass, what exactly does getting “more muscular” mean in quantitative terms?
And everyone whether they like it or not subscribes to the bulk/cut school of bodybuilding.
Caloric excess = muscle gain, caloric deficit equals = fat loss.
You’re either doing one or the other and its not optimal to try and do both at the same time.