Terrorist Leaders: Vote Democratic!

Off Topic Politics and World Issues
21

[quote]vroom wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Just curious…did anyone click the link? Us rightwing crazies want to know…

Voting for the Dems will bring MORE violence and MORE terrorism. The terrorists themselves make that pretty clear. Show one sign that you’re ready to topple, and down you’ll go.

You can’t win by giving up. You can’t win by not fighting back. You can’t win through weakness. You can’t win through appeasement. You can’t win by showing timidity.

Either sack up America or get out of the way and let the Chinese run things. An orderly world needs a cop with balls, not a Nancy Pelosi.

It’s time to get creative Nuthunter, because you sure as fuck can’t win by staying the course either… or the Prez wouldn’t have changed his wording.

Also, how stupid are you going to look in three days when the wack house unviels it’s new strategy and it’s counter to your hysteria?

Oh, never mind, you already look like a complete dufus as it is.[/quote]

Wow, Vroomie, did your mom vacuuming upstairs wake you up too early? What a grumpy little ‘soldier’ you are today!!

In case you weren’t awake yet, you do realize that I was saying, ‘No more half-assed measures! Win or let the Chinese take over.’

I know you’d love to vote here, since most Canadians are American-wannabes, but we’re pretty much done with marxism/socialism, and all such evil crap that you libs can’t let go of. You might be shocked by Tuesday’s outcomes.

But, even if the Dems get an ‘Indian Summer’ before their demise, don’t worry. Your good neighbors to the south will always protect you guys.

22

In my best dead Osama voice:
“Vote republican, it doesn’t matter anyway since I’ve been dead for a couple of years already, boooohhhhh”

23

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Just curious…did anyone click the link? Us rightwing crazies want to know…

Voting for the Dems will bring MORE violence and MORE terrorism. The terrorists themselves make that pretty clear. Show one sign that you’re ready to topple, and down you’ll go.

You can’t win by giving up. You can’t win by not fighting back. You can’t win through weakness. You can’t win through appeasement. You can’t win by showing timidity.

Either sack up America or get out of the way and let the Chinese run things. An orderly world needs a cop with balls, not a Nancy Pelosi.

[/quote]

So sayeth the T-Nation forum’s resident terrorist.

*HH attempts to terrorize and that makes him a terrorist.

Keep up the great work.

Stock up on TRIBEX, Nancy (i.e. HH).

24

[quote]jlesk68 wrote:
In my best dead Osama voice:
“Vote republican, it doesn’t matter anyway since I’ve been dead for a couple of years already, boooohhhhh”[/quote]

CartoonWorld are holding elections at the same time as the US midterms? Funny coincidence.

25

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
In case you weren’t awake yet, you do realize that I was saying, ‘No more half-assed measures! Win or let the Chinese take over.’
[/quote]

Blah blah blah. Same old trolling nonsense.

Looky Nuthunter, as long as the US is full of kooky political sheep/cheerleaders such as yourself, it’s not going to be effective on the world stage because of electing cartoon politicians.

Keep it up funny man, you are the epitome of the demise of your own country. Driven to panick by your own fearful little ideologies and unable to see past the nonsense you swallow on a daily basis.

26

[quote]pookie wrote:
jlesk68 wrote:
In my best dead Osama voice:
“Vote republican, it doesn’t matter anyway since I’ve been dead for a couple of years already, boooohhhhh”

CartoonWorld are holding elections at the same time as the US midterms? Funny coincidence.
[/quote]

hhmmmm…

27

[quote]vroom wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Just curious…did anyone click the link? Us rightwing crazies want to know…

Voting for the Dems will bring MORE violence and MORE terrorism. The terrorists themselves make that pretty clear. Show one sign that you’re ready to topple, and down you’ll go.

You can’t win by giving up. You can’t win by not fighting back. You can’t win through weakness. You can’t win through appeasement. You can’t win by showing timidity.

Either sack up America or get out of the way and let the Chinese run things. An orderly world needs a cop with balls, not a Nancy Pelosi.

It’s time to get creative Nuthunter, because you sure as fuck can’t win by staying the course either… or the Prez wouldn’t have changed his wording.

Also, how stupid are you going to look in three days when the wack house unviels it’s new strategy and it’s counter to your hysteria?

Oh, never mind, you already look like a complete dufus as it is.[/quote]

Hahaha.

Ayn Rand would stay the course I bet. Maybe that’s where he’s getting all this from?

Gotta love election season…the nutjobs come out of the woodwork.

28

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
vroom wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Just curious…did anyone click the link? Us rightwing crazies want to know…

Voting for the Dems will bring MORE violence and MORE terrorism. The terrorists themselves make that pretty clear. Show one sign that you’re ready to topple, and down you’ll go.

You can’t win by giving up. You can’t win by not fighting back. You can’t win through weakness. You can’t win through appeasement. You can’t win by showing timidity.

Either sack up America or get out of the way and let the Chinese run things. An orderly world needs a cop with balls, not a Nancy Pelosi.

It’s time to get creative Nuthunter, because you sure as fuck can’t win by staying the course either… or the Prez wouldn’t have changed his wording.

Also, how stupid are you going to look in three days when the wack house unviels it’s new strategy and it’s counter to your hysteria?

Oh, never mind, you already look like a complete dufus as it is.

Hahaha.

Ayn Rand would stay the course I bet. Maybe that’s where he’s getting all this from?

Gotta love election season…the nutjobs come out of the woodwork.[/quote]

He was in the woodwork? The last time I checked, he’s been in plain sight all along.

29

[quote]100meters wrote:
I’ve never seen anyone so frightened by men in caves.

Sad, really sad.[/quote]

It’s not men in caves; it’s men with diapers on their heads. I mean, damn, some baby poop could leak out! Nasty!

30

[quote]pookie wrote:
Zeppelin795 wrote:
Agreed. Did you happen to catch the documentary on HBO called Hacking Democracy? Pretty good.

No I haven’t. But those machines are in the news almost weekly, and generally it’s to report either a problem, some failure, how easy they are to tamper with, etc.

Sadly, no one really seems to give a shit whether their vote is counted properly or not.
[/quote]

Yes it is quite sad. Especially since a good portion of those people are flag waving pretend-o-patriots!

31

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Just curious…did anyone click the link? Us rightwing crazies want to know…

Voting for the Dems will bring MORE violence and MORE terrorism. The terrorists themselves make that pretty clear. Show one sign that you’re ready to topple, and down you’ll go.

You can’t win by giving up. You can’t win by not fighting back. You can’t win through weakness. You can’t win through appeasement. You can’t win by showing timidity.

Either sack up America or get out of the way and let the Chinese run things. An orderly world needs a cop with balls, not a Nancy Pelosi.

[/quote]

The thing is, we know for a fact that having republicans in control has given us:
1.9/11
2.Iraq

  1. 2005:
    “The number of terrorist attacks worldwide increased nearly fourfold in 2005 to 11,111, with strikes in Iraq accounting for 30 percent of the total, according to statistics released by U.S. counterterrorism officials yesterday”
  1. 2004:
    The number of serious international terrorist incidents more than tripled last year, according to U.S. government figures, a sharp upswing in deadly attacks that the State Department has decided not to make public in its annual report on terrorism due to Congress this week.

Overall, the number of what the U.S. government considers “significant” attacks grew to about 655 last year, up from the record of around 175 in 2003, according to congressional aides who were briefed on statistics covering incidents including the bloody school seizure in Russia and violence related to the disputed Indian territory of Kashmir.

  1. 2003:
    WASHINGTON (CNN) – The U.S. government restated its 2003 accounting of terrorist attacks Tuesday, reporting a sharp increase in the number of significant attacks and more than doubling its initial count of those killed.

The State Department’s annual Patterns of Global Terrorism report now counts 208 terrorist attacks as having occurred in 2003, with 625 dead. When the report was released in April, it counted 307 deaths in a total of 190 terror attacks.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/22/powell.terror/

and on and on…

You can see why Osama supports Bush so much…

Hence, my democratic votes tomorrow.
(because I want less terror/terrorists)