I have to agree with majority opinion expressed above (even if that makes me disagree with CT - ack!). I guess the thing that got me about the article was a feeling of: okaaay…so?
Even the Venice Beach Sex Cult article had something to do with bodybuilding. So I didn’t mind it. But there just wasn’t anything to latch onto with this new one. So some woman’s been celibate for two years. So what? If it had been a guy, would TC have run the article? Highly doubtful. But because it’s a chick, I guess he thought it had some sort or cachet or something.
I can see the desire to run something genuinely informative about women’s views on sex. After all, they don’t talk about it enough it real life. (Please address all flames care of “Mike the Lib”…) Hence the Gang 'o Babes series. But that doesn’t mean that having a woman just sit and talk about her sex life (or lack of same) necessarily makes for interesting reading. In this case, it certainly didn’t.
Still, I’d like to know what TC was thinking when he decided to run the thing. His instincts are usually good, even if the execution occasionally gets messed up.
And yes, the rest of the issue was great!