Syrian Airstrike, Delayed by U.S.

via the Political Animal…

High Level Debate Stalled Syria Air Strike

The September Israeli airstrike on a suspected nuclear
site in Syria had been in the works for months, ABC News
has learned, and was delayed only at the strong urging of the United States.

In early July the Israelis presented the United States with satellite imagery that they said showed a nuclear facility in Syria. They had additional evidence that they said showed that some of the technology was supplied by North Korea.

One U.S. official told ABC’s Martha Raddatz the material was “jaw dropping” because it raised questions as to why U.S. intelligence had not previously picked up on the facility.


and this:

The big mystery of the strike is how did the non-stealthy F-15s and F-16s get through the Syrian air defense radars without being detected? Some U.S. officials say they have the answer.

U.S. aerospace industry and retired military officials indicated today that a technology like the U.S.-developed �??Suter�?? airborne network attack system developed by BAE Systems and integrated into U.S. unmanned aircraft by L-3 Communications was used by the Israelis. The system has been used or at least tested operationally in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last year.

The technology allows users to invade communications networks, see what enemy sensors see and even take over as systems administrator so sensors can be manipulated into positions so that approaching aircraft can�??t be seen, they say. The process involves locating enemy emitters with great precision and then directing data streams into them that can include false targets and misleading messages algorithms that allow a number of activities including control.

A Kuwaiti newspaper wrote that “Russian experts are studying why the two state-of-the art Russian-built radar systems in Syria did not detect the Israeli jets entering Syrian territory. Iran reportedly has asked the same question, since it is buying the same systems and might have paid for the Syrian acquisitions.”

Kevin Drum(Political Animal/Washington Monthly) speculates:

"Obviously I’m just playing amateur sleuth here, but it doesn’t seem like you’d tip your hand about the capabilities of technology like this in order to destroy a bunch of rocket launchers and North Korean Scuds. The mission had to be important enough to make it worth letting the Syrians (and the Iranians and the Russians) know that their air defenses had been compromised. They might figure out how to fix it next time, after all. So maybe there was some North Korean nuclear technology there after all.

And is it a coincidence that within weeks North Korea suddenly decided to cut a deal with the U.S. to abandon its nuclear program? It might well be. But it is something of a coincidence, isn’t it?"

If their air defenses are compromised, why the hell tip your hand?

[quote]Gkhan wrote:
If their air defenses are compromised, why the hell tip your hand?[/quote]

It’s an operational test for the raids on Iran.

The hardward will not change but the software that runs it will be upgraded based on what the Israeli’s encountered.

Next generation warfare type stuff. My guess is they have more we haven’t seen yet.

I agree,it was a live test run.

The attack will come on the Monday before the second Tuesday of the month.

October 8th? Maybe we should put money on it. Or do you mean the second tuesday of next week?