T Nation

Studies Show Unvaccinated Children Healthier


#1
Studies outside the U.S. show unvaccinated children healthier than vaccinated children
Christina England
VacTruth.com
Sun, 01 Feb 2015



Health Impact News Editor Comments:

Christina England has done an excellent job of digging up some previous studies conducted in New Zealand and Germany comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children.

In addition to these two studies, there was also a clinical study conducted in Hong Kong in in 2012 comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children in regards to the flu vaccine. Researchers conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled trial on children with the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Their results were published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases in 2012, and they found that the seasonal trivalent flu vaccine resulted in 5.5 times more incidents of respiratory illness than the placebo group. Read more about the study here.

If you watch the video below of Congressman Posey questioning the CDC at an autism Congressional hearing back in November of 2012, you will hear the CDC admit that they have never conducted a study in the U.S. comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children.

Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier Than Their Vaccinated Peers

A study from the 1990s has come to light, proving that compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children were more likely to suffer from asthma, eczema, ear infections, hyperactivity and many other chronic conditions.

Furthermore, the study identified that there was a ten-fold increase in the incidence of tonsillitis in the children who were vaccinated, and a total lack tonsillectomy operations among the children who were unvaccinated. In 1992, the Immunization Awareness Society (IAS) conducted a survey to examine the health of New Zealand's children.

Unsurprisingly, the results of their study indicated that unvaccinated children were far healthier than vaccinated children. Questionnaires were given out to IAS members, their friends and their associates asking various health questions. A total of 245 families returned their questionnaires, giving the researchers a total of 495 children surveyed. Of these children, 226 were vaccinated and 269 were unvaccinated.

Healthy Children and Ethics

The ages of the children ranged between the ages of two weeks - 46 years (obviously some friends were older with older children). Of the children studied, 273 were males and 216 were females. (Six children were unclassified.) Sue Claridge, who reported on the study, wrote:

"Respondents were asked to provide the year of birth, gender, vaccinations received, whether or not the child suffered from a range of chronic conditions (asthma, eczema, ear infections/glue ear, recurring tonsillitis, hyperactivity, diabetes or epilepsy) whether or not he or she needed grommets, had had a tonsillectomy, or were shown to develop motor skills (walking, crawling, sitting-up etc.). Parents also provided information on breastfeeding and bottle feeding and when a child was weaned if breastfed."

During the study, another interesting fact emerged. Researchers discovered that 92 percent of the children requiring a tonsillectomy operation had received the measles vaccination, indicating that the vaccination for measles may have made some of the children more susceptible to tonsillitis. The study also revealed that 81 of the families had both vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Many of these families had vaccinated their older children but had grown more reluctant to vaccinate their younger children, due to their growing concerns regarding vaccine safety. Researchers concluded that:

"While this was a very limited study, particularly in terms of the numbers of unvaccinated children that were involved and the range of chronic conditions investigated, it provides solid scientific evidence in support of considerable anecdotal evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier that their vaccinated peers." [1]

Although governments from around the world have continually stated that studying vaccinated versus unvaccinated children would be unethical, the New Zealand researchers are not the only group of researchers to study comparisons.

Vaccinated Children 5 Times More Likely To Suffer From A Range Of Diseases

In September 2011, German researchers carrying out a longitudinal study surveyed a total of 8000 unvaccinated children from the ages of 0 - 19. As with the New Zealand study, researchers collected their data by conducting a survey using questionnaires. [2]

Results showed that vaccinated children were up to five times more likely to suffer from a variety of diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children. Their results were compared to another German study (KiGGS), which examined a larger sample group consisting of 17,461 participants between the ages of 0 - 17. Dr. Andreas Bachair, a German classical homeopathic practitioner, responsible for collecting the results of the survey from the website vaccineinjury.info stated that:

"Asthma, hay fever and neurodermatitis are seen very frequently today. A recent German study with 17461 children between 0-17 years of age (KIGGS) showed that 4.7% of these children suffer from asthma, 10.7% of these children from hay fever and 13.2% from neurodermatitis. These numbers differ in western countries, i.e. the prevalence of asthma among children in the US is 6% whereas it is 14-16% in Australia (Australia's Health 2004, AIHW).

The prevalence of asthma among unvaccinated children in our study is around 2.5%, hay fever, 3%, and neurodermatitis, 7%. According to the KIGGS study more than 40% of children between the ages of 3 and 17 years were sensitized against at least one allergen tested (20 common allergens were tested) and 22.9% had an allergic disease. Although we did not perform a blood test, around 10% stated that their children had an allergy." [3]

(As this study is a longitudinal study, the number of children being studied has since risen to 13,222. To join the study, you can fill in the questionnaire provided by clicking on the link listed as the third reference at the end of this article.) Although there were four cases of autism reported among unvaccinated children, Dr. Bachair reported that:

"Of these 4 children one tested very high for metals (mercury, aluminium, arsenic); in another case the mother was tested very high for mercury."

However, this number pales into insignificance when we compare it to the 1 in 88 children currently being reported as autistic by the CDC. [4]

Other Conditions Found To Be Almost Non-Existent In Unvaccinated Children

Dr. Andreas Bachair continued her report by stating that their study found the prevalence of sinusitis, warts, skin problems and middle ear infections were also much lower in the unvaccinated children, as were the cases of diabetes and epilepsy. She went on to say that the results demonstrated that the prevalence of many conditions in the unvaccinated children were also significantly lower. These were:

"Other disorders and diseases

As we included open questions in our survey we evaluated the prevalence (of the first 10,070 participants) of some other disorders and illnesses. Unvaccinated children show very low prevalences of the following disorders:


    Dyslexia: 0.21%
    Speech delay/articulation problems: 0.38%
    Sensory Processing disorder: 0.28%
    Anxiety: 0.25%
    Depression: 0.12%
    Bedwetting: 0.12%
    Celiac disease: 0.12%
    Gluten sensitivity: 0.41%
    GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease): 0.06%"



Dr. Bachair concluded her amazing and intuitive paper by adding a number of statements from parents, which I believe really added weight to her overall findings.

Conclusion

I find it amazing that despite mainstream media and leading government agencies stressing repeatedly that studies comparing vaccinated children to unvaccinated children cannot take place for ethical reasons, groups around the world are taking it upon themselves to do these studies anyway.

References

1. http://www.viewbix.com/v/Unvaccinated-Children-Healthier...

2. http://healthimpactnews.com/2011/new-study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases...

3. http://www.vaccineinjury.info/vaccinations-in-general/health-unvaccinated-children...

4. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html

Anti-Vax Mom Changes Tune, Her 7 Kids Get Whooping Cough
Anti-Vax Mom Changes Tune, Her 7 Kids Get Whooping Cough
Anti-Vax Mom Changes Tune, Her 7 Kids Get Whooping Cough
Anti-Vax Mom Changes Tune, Her 7 Kids Get Whooping Cough
Anti-Vax Mom Changes Tune, Her 7 Kids Get Whooping Cough
Anti-Vax Mom Changes Tune, Her 7 Kids Get Whooping Cough
#2

[quote]F.I.S.T. wrote:

Studies outside the U.S. show unvaccinated children healthier than vaccinated children
Christina England
VacTruth.com
Sun, 01 Feb 2015



Health Impact News Editor Comments:

Christina England has done an excellent job of digging up some previous studies conducted in New Zealand and Germany comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children.

In addition to these two studies, there was also a clinical study conducted in Hong Kong in in 2012 comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children in regards to the flu vaccine. Researchers conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled trial on children with the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Their results were published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases in 2012, and they found that the seasonal trivalent flu vaccine resulted in 5.5 times more incidents of respiratory illness than the placebo group. Read more about the study here.

If you watch the video below of Congressman Posey questioning the CDC at an autism Congressional hearing back in November of 2012, you will hear the CDC admit that they have never conducted a study in the U.S. comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children.

Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier Than Their Vaccinated Peers

A study from the 1990s has come to light, proving that compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children were more likely to suffer from asthma, eczema, ear infections, hyperactivity and many other chronic conditions.

Furthermore, the study identified that there was a ten-fold increase in the incidence of tonsillitis in the children who were vaccinated, and a total lack tonsillectomy operations among the children who were unvaccinated. In 1992, the Immunization Awareness Society (IAS) conducted a survey to examine the health of New Zealand's children.

Unsurprisingly, the results of their study indicated that unvaccinated children were far healthier than vaccinated children. Questionnaires were given out to IAS members, their friends and their associates asking various health questions. A total of 245 families returned their questionnaires, giving the researchers a total of 495 children surveyed. Of these children, 226 were vaccinated and 269 were unvaccinated.

Healthy Children and Ethics

The ages of the children ranged between the ages of two weeks - 46 years (obviously some friends were older with older children). Of the children studied, 273 were males and 216 were females. (Six children were unclassified.) Sue Claridge, who reported on the study, wrote:

"Respondents were asked to provide the year of birth, gender, vaccinations received, whether or not the child suffered from a range of chronic conditions (asthma, eczema, ear infections/glue ear, recurring tonsillitis, hyperactivity, diabetes or epilepsy) whether or not he or she needed grommets, had had a tonsillectomy, or were shown to develop motor skills (walking, crawling, sitting-up etc.). Parents also provided information on breastfeeding and bottle feeding and when a child was weaned if breastfed."

During the study, another interesting fact emerged. Researchers discovered that 92 percent of the children requiring a tonsillectomy operation had received the measles vaccination, indicating that the vaccination for measles may have made some of the children more susceptible to tonsillitis. The study also revealed that 81 of the families had both vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Many of these families had vaccinated their older children but had grown more reluctant to vaccinate their younger children, due to their growing concerns regarding vaccine safety. Researchers concluded that:

"While this was a very limited study, particularly in terms of the numbers of unvaccinated children that were involved and the range of chronic conditions investigated, it provides solid scientific evidence in support of considerable anecdotal evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier that their vaccinated peers." [1]

Although governments from around the world have continually stated that studying vaccinated versus unvaccinated children would be unethical, the New Zealand researchers are not the only group of researchers to study comparisons.

Vaccinated Children 5 Times More Likely To Suffer From A Range Of Diseases

In September 2011, German researchers carrying out a longitudinal study surveyed a total of 8000 unvaccinated children from the ages of 0 - 19. As with the New Zealand study, researchers collected their data by conducting a survey using questionnaires. [2]

Results showed that vaccinated children were up to five times more likely to suffer from a variety of diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children. Their results were compared to another German study (KiGGS), which examined a larger sample group consisting of 17,461 participants between the ages of 0 - 17. Dr. Andreas Bachair, a German classical homeopathic practitioner, responsible for collecting the results of the survey from the website vaccineinjury.info stated that:

"Asthma, hay fever and neurodermatitis are seen very frequently today. A recent German study with 17461 children between 0-17 years of age (KIGGS) showed that 4.7% of these children suffer from asthma, 10.7% of these children from hay fever and 13.2% from neurodermatitis. These numbers differ in western countries, i.e. the prevalence of asthma among children in the US is 6% whereas it is 14-16% in Australia (Australia's Health 2004, AIHW).

The prevalence of asthma among unvaccinated children in our study is around 2.5%, hay fever, 3%, and neurodermatitis, 7%. According to the KIGGS study more than 40% of children between the ages of 3 and 17 years were sensitized against at least one allergen tested (20 common allergens were tested) and 22.9% had an allergic disease. Although we did not perform a blood test, around 10% stated that their children had an allergy." [3]

(As this study is a longitudinal study, the number of children being studied has since risen to 13,222. To join the study, you can fill in the questionnaire provided by clicking on the link listed as the third reference at the end of this article.) Although there were four cases of autism reported among unvaccinated children, Dr. Bachair reported that:

"Of these 4 children one tested very high for metals (mercury, aluminium, arsenic); in another case the mother was tested very high for mercury."

However, this number pales into insignificance when we compare it to the 1 in 88 children currently being reported as autistic by the CDC. [4]

Other Conditions Found To Be Almost Non-Existent In Unvaccinated Children

Dr. Andreas Bachair continued her report by stating that their study found the prevalence of sinusitis, warts, skin problems and middle ear infections were also much lower in the unvaccinated children, as were the cases of diabetes and epilepsy. She went on to say that the results demonstrated that the prevalence of many conditions in the unvaccinated children were also significantly lower. These were:

"Other disorders and diseases

As we included open questions in our survey we evaluated the prevalence (of the first 10,070 participants) of some other disorders and illnesses. Unvaccinated children show very low prevalences of the following disorders:


    Dyslexia: 0.21%
    Speech delay/articulation problems: 0.38%
    Sensory Processing disorder: 0.28%
    Anxiety: 0.25%
    Depression: 0.12%
    Bedwetting: 0.12%
    Celiac disease: 0.12%
    Gluten sensitivity: 0.41%
    GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease): 0.06%"



Dr. Bachair concluded her amazing and intuitive paper by adding a number of statements from parents, which I believe really added weight to her overall findings.

Conclusion

I find it amazing that despite mainstream media and leading government agencies stressing repeatedly that studies comparing vaccinated children to unvaccinated children cannot take place for ethical reasons, groups around the world are taking it upon themselves to do these studies anyway.

References

1. http://www.viewbix.com/v/Unvaccinated-Children-Healthier...

2. http://healthimpactnews.com/2011/new-study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases...

3. http://www.vaccineinjury.info/vaccinations-in-general/health-unvaccinated-children...

4. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html 

[/quote]

It’s really unfortunate people think that way. Vaccines were invented to deal with diseases that kill people and cause a lot of suffering.

The reality is, people like you are undermining what we have done to thwart these diseases and collapsing the very headway we have made that actually makes it safe for some people with compromised immune systems to not need vaccines, which is not the same as not immunizing your child against shit like measles, mumps and rubella. That shit kills people in other countries and has the history and track record to prove it. How about researching that instead of what you already have? :frowning:

And because fucktard McCarthy and anecdotal studies are being pushed, we have half of middle class mother’s in America buying into this load of crap, and death. What’s wrong with you people? The very pockets of people that haven’t gotten vaccinated have been the ones to be infected. Sorry if I come off abrasive but I feel I need to.


#3

[quote]F.I.S.T. wrote:
Dyslexia: 0.21%
Speech delay/articulation problems: 0.38%
Sensory Processing disorder: 0.28%
Anxiety: 0.25%
Depression: 0.12%
Bedwetting: 0.12%
Celiac disease: 0.12%
Gluten sensitivity: 0.41%
GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease): 0.06%"

Dr. Bachair concluded her amazing and intuitive paper by adding a number of statements from parents, which I believe really added weight to her overall findings.

[/quote]

Which study were these figures from, and how were they arrived at? Did scientists follow up with children as the grew up or were they current figures for the children at the time?

Diagnosing young children with anxiety or depression is tricky and GERD? Really? Is that a common problem in vaccinated children?

Have you ever thought that people who are unwilling to vaccinate their children are also unlikely to recognize or report disorders such as celiac disease, dyslexia, etc?


#4

Uh.

I’d really rather not die to smallpox.

This really is the single fundamental flaw of the anti-vaccination movement. The positives greatly outweigh any negative that I’ve heard thus far. Unless the vaccine completely and utterly failed and proved deadlier than the disease it attempted to vaccinate you from, it is better than fucking smallpox.

Unless, of course, you’d prefer to have smallpox kill millions in the U.S. every year.


#5

[quote]magick wrote:
Uh.

I’d really rather not die to smallpox.[/quote]

Damn, I’m glad I got the vaccination now while I was in the military. People… Holy shit should spend more time in the science and biology class than the Church and media advice from Jenanay McCarthy, whose always been known for her big… Mind…


#6

[quote]Severiano wrote:
Damn, I’m glad I got the vaccination now while I was in the military. People… Holy shit should spend more time in the science and biology class than the Church and media advice from Jenanay McCarthy, whose always been known for her big… Mind…
[/quote]

The church is not a big part of the movement. It’s either deliberate disinformation as spread by the quack who claimed common vaccinations caused autism (which he later stated was a flawed study and withdrew), or just fucking idiots who DO NOT REMEMBER WHAT THE FUCK SMALLPOX IS.

Seriously, who cares about measles. Fuck measles.

I care a lot more about TB and smallpox.

Fuck those diseases.


#7

Anecdote: I haven’t had the flu in over a decade since I STOPPED receiving a flu shot.

I believe vaccines are mostly unnecessary if the immune system is kept healthy with proper diet, lifestyle, etc.

On the plus side, not getting vaccinated is a good way to help thin out the genetically weak.


#8

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Anecdote: I haven’t had the flu in over a decade since I STOPPED receiving a flu shot.

I believe vaccines are mostly unnecessary if the immune system is kept healthy with proper diet, lifestyle, etc.

On the plus side, not getting vaccinated is a good way to help thin out the genetically weak.[/quote]

Then you don’t know what you’re talking about. Most diseases that are vaccinated for have nothing to do with immune system strength. Some even target people with strong immune systems while those with weak immune systems are left alone. This was the case with the recent Ebola outbreak. It killed via a “cytokine reaction” - ie, it sent people’s immune systems into overdrive and their own immune system killed them. This is why most the deaths were healthy young people whilst children, elderly and the frail/sick - ie, people with weak immune systems, were largely unharmed.


#9

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Anecdote: I haven’t had the flu in over a decade since I STOPPED receiving a flu shot.

I believe vaccines are mostly unnecessary if the immune system is kept healthy with proper diet, lifestyle, etc.

On the plus side, not getting vaccinated is a good way to help thin out the genetically weak.[/quote]

Go break into the CDC, find the vial of smallpox they got, and deliberately infect yourself with it.

Let’s see how well you do.


#10

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Some even target people with strong immune systems while those with weak immune systems are left alone. It killed via a “cytokine reaction” - ie, it sent people’s immune systems into overdrive and their own immune system killed them.[/quote]

From what I read, the Spanish Influenza did essentially the same thing. Hence young people died more because they had stronger and healthier immune systems than the elderly.


#11

[quote]magick wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Some even target people with strong immune systems while those with weak immune systems are left alone. It killed via a “cytokine reaction” - ie, it sent people’s immune systems into overdrive and their own immune system killed them.[/quote]

From what I read, the Spanish Influenza did essentially the same thing. Hence young people died more because they had stronger and healthier immune systems than the elderly.[/quote]

Yes exactly. People don’t realise just how deadly that outbreak was. Some countries like Haiti lost 20% of their entire population. Even the number of deaths from the war was miniscule compared to the global death toll from the influenza outbreak.


#12

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Yes exactly. People don’t realise just how deadly that outbreak was. Some countries like Haiti lost 20% of their entire population. Even the number of deaths from the war was miniscule compared to the global death toll from the influenza outbreak.[/quote]

Probably because the death occurred mostly in third-world countries. If death rates similar to what happened elsewhere occurred in the U.S. then everyone would be scared to death of the flu for all posterity.

Honestly, nothing scares me more than another incident of a flu like the Spanish Influenza. And the truly scary part is that it WILL happen eventually, and it WILL mean the end of civilization as we know it.


#13

From Wikipedia:

Smallpox was localized in small blood vessels of the skin and in the mouth and throat. In the skin it resulted in a characteristic maculopapular rash and, later, raised fluid-filled blisters. V. major produced a more serious disease and had an overall mortality rate of 30-35 percent. V. minor caused a milder form of disease (also known as alastrim, cottonpox, milkpox, whitepox, and Cuban itch) which killed about 1 percent of its victims. Long-term complications of V. major infection included characteristic scars, commonly on the face, which occur in 65-85 percent of survivors. Blindness resulting from corneal ulceration and scarring, and limb deformities due to arthritis and osteomyelitis were less common complications, seen in about 2-5 percent of cases.

Smallpox is believed to have emerged in human populations about 10,000 BC. The earliest physical evidence of it is probably the pustular rash on the mummified body of Pharaoh Ramses V of Egypt. The disease killed an estimated 400,000 Europeans annually during the closing years of the 18th century (including five reigning monarchs), and was responsible for a third of all blindness. Of all those infected, 20-60 percent and over 80 percent of infected children died from the disease. Smallpox was responsible for an estimated 300?500 million deaths during the 20th century. As recently as 1967, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that 15 million people contracted the disease and that two million died in that year.

After vaccination campaigns throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, the WHO certified the eradication of smallpox in 1979. Smallpox is one of two infectious diseases to have been eradicated, the other being rinderpest, which was declared eradicated in 2011.


But ya, vaccines are risky and bad and a conspiracy conjured up by the drug companies.


#14

[quote]magick wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Yes exactly. People don’t realise just how deadly that outbreak was. Some countries like Haiti lost 20% of their entire population. Even the number of deaths from the war was miniscule compared to the global death toll from the influenza outbreak.[/quote]

Probably because the death occurred mostly in third-world countries. If death rates similar to what happened elsewhere occurred in the U.S. then everyone would be scared to death of the flu for all posterity.

Honestly, nothing scares me more than another incident of a flu like the Spanish Influenza. And the truly scary part is that it WILL happen eventually, and it WILL mean the end of civilization as we know it.[/quote]

Actually the death rates in the developed world were huge too. Well over half a million deaths in America. The reason was it was covered up and downplayed initially because they were worried it would harm the war effort and cause panic. And then when millions of soldiers started coming home at the end of the war the second wave occurred as they brought the disease home.


#15

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Actually the death rates in the developed world were huge too. Well over half a million deaths in America. The reason was it was covered up and downplayed initially because they were worried it would harm the war effort and cause panic. And then when millions of soldiers started coming home at the end of the war the second wave occurred as they brought the disease home. [/quote]

Oh I don’t mean to downplay what happened in the U.S. Just that we didn’t lose 20% of our population.


#16

This is worth a listen:

It’s Michael Savage on immigrants and pandemics. Mass immigration has brought about the resurgence of many diseases once thought eradicated or confined to some swamp in Africa or Brazil or something. Many actually were eradicated and have now been reintroduced to the West. A flu pandemic spread recently in the States was found to have come from Honduras. Gee, I wonder how that got in?

Anyway, yes I know Savage is a mental patient but on this subject he knows what he’s talking about. He has two masters and a PhD in epidemiology and he wrote a book on the subject back in the 80’s.


#17

Don’t the anti-vaxxers realize that the Annunaki will just vaccinate/poison everyone with chemtrails? I can’t stop them. You can’t stop them. They are everywhere.


#18

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
A flu pandemic spread recently in the States was found to have come from Honduras. Gee, I wonder how that got in?[/quote]

“but but, that’s racist and you’re just a crazy anti-vaccine right winger. What do you want children to die?”

  • rebuttal from left when drawing comparison to immigration to these “new” diseases.

#19

[quote]twojarslave wrote:
Don’t the anti-vaxxers realize that the Annunaki will just vaccinate/poison everyone with chemtrails? I can’t stop them. You can’t stop them. They are everywhere.[/quote]

Good point. Resistance is futile.


#20

[quote]Severiano wrote:

[quote]F.I.S.T. wrote:

Studies outside the U.S. show unvaccinated children healthier than vaccinated children
Christina England
VacTruth.com
Sun, 01 Feb 2015



Health Impact News Editor Comments:

Christina England has done an excellent job of digging up some previous studies conducted in New Zealand and Germany comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children.

In addition to these two studies, there was also a clinical study conducted in Hong Kong in in 2012 comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children in regards to the flu vaccine. Researchers conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled trial on children with the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Their results were published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases in 2012, and they found that the seasonal trivalent flu vaccine resulted in 5.5 times more incidents of respiratory illness than the placebo group. Read more about the study here.

If you watch the video below of Congressman Posey questioning the CDC at an autism Congressional hearing back in November of 2012, you will hear the CDC admit that they have never conducted a study in the U.S. comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children.

Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier Than Their Vaccinated Peers

A study from the 1990s has come to light, proving that compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children were more likely to suffer from asthma, eczema, ear infections, hyperactivity and many other chronic conditions.

Furthermore, the study identified that there was a ten-fold increase in the incidence of tonsillitis in the children who were vaccinated, and a total lack tonsillectomy operations among the children who were unvaccinated. In 1992, the Immunization Awareness Society (IAS) conducted a survey to examine the health of New Zealand's children.

Unsurprisingly, the results of their study indicated that unvaccinated children were far healthier than vaccinated children. Questionnaires were given out to IAS members, their friends and their associates asking various health questions. A total of 245 families returned their questionnaires, giving the researchers a total of 495 children surveyed. Of these children, 226 were vaccinated and 269 were unvaccinated.

Healthy Children and Ethics

The ages of the children ranged between the ages of two weeks - 46 years (obviously some friends were older with older children). Of the children studied, 273 were males and 216 were females. (Six children were unclassified.) Sue Claridge, who reported on the study, wrote:

"Respondents were asked to provide the year of birth, gender, vaccinations received, whether or not the child suffered from a range of chronic conditions (asthma, eczema, ear infections/glue ear, recurring tonsillitis, hyperactivity, diabetes or epilepsy) whether or not he or she needed grommets, had had a tonsillectomy, or were shown to develop motor skills (walking, crawling, sitting-up etc.). Parents also provided information on breastfeeding and bottle feeding and when a child was weaned if breastfed."

During the study, another interesting fact emerged. Researchers discovered that 92 percent of the children requiring a tonsillectomy operation had received the measles vaccination, indicating that the vaccination for measles may have made some of the children more susceptible to tonsillitis. The study also revealed that 81 of the families had both vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Many of these families had vaccinated their older children but had grown more reluctant to vaccinate their younger children, due to their growing concerns regarding vaccine safety. Researchers concluded that:

"While this was a very limited study, particularly in terms of the numbers of unvaccinated children that were involved and the range of chronic conditions investigated, it provides solid scientific evidence in support of considerable anecdotal evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier that their vaccinated peers." [1]

Although governments from around the world have continually stated that studying vaccinated versus unvaccinated children would be unethical, the New Zealand researchers are not the only group of researchers to study comparisons.

Vaccinated Children 5 Times More Likely To Suffer From A Range Of Diseases

In September 2011, German researchers carrying out a longitudinal study surveyed a total of 8000 unvaccinated children from the ages of 0 - 19. As with the New Zealand study, researchers collected their data by conducting a survey using questionnaires. [2]

Results showed that vaccinated children were up to five times more likely to suffer from a variety of diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children. Their results were compared to another German study (KiGGS), which examined a larger sample group consisting of 17,461 participants between the ages of 0 - 17. Dr. Andreas Bachair, a German classical homeopathic practitioner, responsible for collecting the results of the survey from the website vaccineinjury.info stated that:

"Asthma, hay fever and neurodermatitis are seen very frequently today. A recent German study with 17461 children between 0-17 years of age (KIGGS) showed that 4.7% of these children suffer from asthma, 10.7% of these children from hay fever and 13.2% from neurodermatitis. These numbers differ in western countries, i.e. the prevalence of asthma among children in the US is 6% whereas it is 14-16% in Australia (Australia's Health 2004, AIHW).

The prevalence of asthma among unvaccinated children in our study is around 2.5%, hay fever, 3%, and neurodermatitis, 7%. According to the KIGGS study more than 40% of children between the ages of 3 and 17 years were sensitized against at least one allergen tested (20 common allergens were tested) and 22.9% had an allergic disease. Although we did not perform a blood test, around 10% stated that their children had an allergy." [3]

(As this study is a longitudinal study, the number of children being studied has since risen to 13,222. To join the study, you can fill in the questionnaire provided by clicking on the link listed as the third reference at the end of this article.) Although there were four cases of autism reported among unvaccinated children, Dr. Bachair reported that:

"Of these 4 children one tested very high for metals (mercury, aluminium, arsenic); in another case the mother was tested very high for mercury."

However, this number pales into insignificance when we compare it to the 1 in 88 children currently being reported as autistic by the CDC. [4]

Other Conditions Found To Be Almost Non-Existent In Unvaccinated Children

Dr. Andreas Bachair continued her report by stating that their study found the prevalence of sinusitis, warts, skin problems and middle ear infections were also much lower in the unvaccinated children, as were the cases of diabetes and epilepsy. She went on to say that the results demonstrated that the prevalence of many conditions in the unvaccinated children were also significantly lower. These were:

"Other disorders and diseases

As we included open questions in our survey we evaluated the prevalence (of the first 10,070 participants) of some other disorders and illnesses. Unvaccinated children show very low prevalences of the following disorders:


    Dyslexia: 0.21%
    Speech delay/articulation problems: 0.38%
    Sensory Processing disorder: 0.28%
    Anxiety: 0.25%
    Depression: 0.12%
    Bedwetting: 0.12%
    Celiac disease: 0.12%
    Gluten sensitivity: 0.41%
    GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease): 0.06%"



Dr. Bachair concluded her amazing and intuitive paper by adding a number of statements from parents, which I believe really added weight to her overall findings.

Conclusion

I find it amazing that despite mainstream media and leading government agencies stressing repeatedly that studies comparing vaccinated children to unvaccinated children cannot take place for ethical reasons, groups around the world are taking it upon themselves to do these studies anyway.

References

1. http://www.viewbix.com/v/Unvaccinated-Children-Healthier...

2. http://healthimpactnews.com/2011/new-study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases...

3. http://www.vaccineinjury.info/vaccinations-in-general/health-unvaccinated-children...

4. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html 

[/quote]

It’s really unfortunate people think that way. Vaccines were invented to deal with diseases that kill people and cause a lot of suffering.

The reality is, people like you are undermining what we have done to thwart these diseases and collapsing the very headway we have made that actually makes it safe for some people with compromised immune systems to not need vaccines, which is not the same as not immunizing your child against shit like measles, mumps and rubella. That shit kills people in other countries and has the history and track record to prove it. How about researching that instead of what you already have? :frowning:

And because fucktard McCarthy and anecdotal studies are being pushed, we have half of middle class mother’s in America buying into this load of crap, and death. What’s wrong with you people? The very pockets of people that haven’t gotten vaccinated have been the ones to be infected. Sorry if I come off abrasive but I feel I need to.
[/quote]

Hell fucking yes