[quote]Professor X wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Ok… side angle, looks like a white kid. (that talks very stereotypical black)
Front angle, looks like a light skinned black kid (from his hair).
I am confused as to why this matters.
Some people would say that a liberal media wont cover the case if it involves black on white crime. If there is no media coverage, there can be no public support for the driver. This is in contrast to white on black crime, like the Duke lacrosse case, which seemed to never go away.
This may or may not occur here. There was a nearly identical case involving a group of kids on a bus that attacked a woman and her fiance. The bus driver was a witness, the local press actually covered the event and one of the attackers was sentenced to a small amount of jail time. This was with only eye witness testimony from the 3 adults and the injuries sustained.
If he is black then that shoots down your “liberal media” theory which again makes me wonder why it matters.
You are relating this to a story that had no video surveillance where the accuser was a woman. You focus on race instead of sex because that is what you want to believe.[/quote]
I’m not the one who brought up race in this discussion. I replied to a thread.
If the attacker was black and the victim white, and the case receives no press coverage, there cant be support for the driver. That does not “shoot” down “my” theory.
I also said the kids attacked a woman AND her fiance.