[quote]strangemeadow wrote:
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
[quote]strangemeadow wrote:
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
[quote]want2getlean wrote:
i tried the legacy on two different occasions, and in my hands, it sounded like absolute SHIT
just not the amp for me, even though i love steve. i’m an orange guy[/quote]
This is a subject of great discussion in my ‘gear whore’ circles.
Marshall and Fender guys can’t seem to dial in Carvins because of the bass frequency. In almost all cases, they find it flubby, say versus a JCM900. I always hear the same thing with the old X100B’s. I have this old XV, same circuit as the X-b series and it’s a monster.
I think it’s the speakers. V30’s or the original Carvin British make the difference.
I also think it’s a feel thing, too. My friend says the same thing about the Carvin, but when I play, he’s like “that sounds great!!!”. He takes my guitar or plugs his in and he hates it.[/quote]
I’ve found that the problem with guitar players that can’t get a great tone out of the Carvin’s is that they just can’t handle/understand the amazing flexability of the tone controls. Fender/Marshall only guys seem to be more “plug and play”.
That being said, I own 5 Marshalls (DSL50, TSL60,DSL40(el84),JTM60,JMP50(78mkii!) and love them for what they are, but my V3 is far more expressive, responsive and generally useful. Carvin=toolbox full of Snap-on. Marshall=1 trick pony.
[/quote]
OK, salivating over the JMP50
I <3 Carvin.
I work-on/restore/rebuild tube amps and I always hate to give the Carvins back ;)[/quote]
I traded a Jubilee for the JMP50. It was modded, so I had it restored to original, then modded to my specs. My amp guy was great. Then I moved! Can I PM you with a potential project?
[/quote]
Sure!