So in your email you try and address government corruption and leave out corporate corruption. When corporate corruption is more. But this fits neatly into your ideology where the government is assigned all or the lions share of corruption. Leaving out the fact that corporations are the catalysts of corruption. Seeking to establish a monopoly power rather than to let competition in. Further proof that your side isn’t interested in what it espouses, only profit at any cost. But this can’t be admitted to because it pokes holes in your economic ideology and furthermore it may bring up other questions with hard to swallow answers. Then the whole house of cards may tumble. It is better to dig in your heels to keep your ideology alive than to admit truths. This would hurt too much.
not just loans made, but asset purchases as well. The bottom line: a Federal Reserve bailout commitment in excess of $29 trillion
I believe ALL profit is the same, I can’t properly defend it but it’s what my ideology tells me so I must believe it. My stupidity does not reflect in my ideology.
Question: who FORCED banks to loan to people who couldn’t afford to pay them back? You want to talk about the catalyst?
Whose idea was it to make banks loan subprime under threat of lawsuit and losing their licenses? (Hint: it wasn’t corporations).
Can you blame the banks for not wanting this bad debt on their books and selling it in MBS to the highest bidder?
Also another point of order. The Federal reserve is owned by the big banks and run by them (board). It’s about as federal as Federal Express. They invented reserve notes out of thin air to bail themselves out. Charging the US interest on them.
Wanna know who created the corrupt federal reserve system and allows it to exist unchanged from 1913 to this day? Congress.
I didn’t leave corporate corruption out. You left government corruption/waste out of your nonsense diatribe about “theft perpetrated by corporations” and I pointed out how shitty the government is.
When the shoe fits.
Utterly ridiculous.
Like government…
Stupid. Fucking stupid as usual.
We already covered the bank bailout, numbnuts. The government MADE MONEY off the bailouts.
Nice try but no, but things designed to limit choice so one can keep up their power and profits. Why is this so hard to understand? Is the level of stupidity that deep or is the brainwashing that complete? Probably a little of both.
I’m always surprised when you push this angle. You’re objectively unintelligent and unsuccessful at every aspect of your life. Why do you spend so much time trying to put people down when you couldn’t even figure out a study was run on hamsters?
My analogy was spot on - there are tons of testimonies by people that Peter Popov helped them. You consistently fail to link to reputable sources, and those few actual studies you link to, as others have shown, you did not understand and didn’t corroborate your claims. All you actually have going for you, Zep, is a bunch of anecdotal evidence, testimonies by people claiming to have been helped!
And once again, your claim that choice is limited is nonsense. You can go to Panama; the government will not stop you. Your choice is not limited by the government nor by big Pharma; you just don’t have access to certain options because you didn’t plan for the future and don’t have good relationships with your family. You’re using the term “choice” to appeal to our ethical sensibilities, but you’re using it in an inaccurate way and thus failing to convince anyone. Ideology isn’t driving us; it’s your pathetic arguments that are failing to convince us to change our minds.
Haha I’m from West virginia. My people don’t do coke then accomplish great things. We’re more ‘get addicted and tank our whole fuckin life’ kinda drug people.