OK dumb dumb. Tell me how many kids use pot (Charlotte’s web or its derivatives) as an anti siesure medication vs. Total usage.
While you’re busy there outsmarting me, maybe you could explain why the legalization movement has morphed from only medical under certain circumstance to recreational use.
Yeah you really busted me there. I’m so ashamed.
You’re like a dildo made out of hogweed. Fucking stupid, useless, and contact results in a rash.
First, those are not “socialistic” policies. Social Democrats are NOT socialists. Those are social policies. Every country has them to varying degrees. They are public goods that every society recognizes are required for the benefit of the country.
Second:
I showed this in the charts for Sweden. You did not contest it.
The report on the Nordic Model YOU POSTED showed the same thing as the chart during the period it was written and concluded their system then without further increasing economic freedom and privatization was UNSUSTAINABLE.
Quit the bullshit.
No, that is not my belief. But you still have no argument because war has not resulted in increases in taxes to >50 percent.
Quit the stupid strawmans.
Why is a capitalist country like Panama allowing stem cells? Why don’t you boycott them if you object to capitalism?
Quit the stupid deflections. I have not even been arguing about pharma but you persist in deflecting so you won’t have to admit to lying about the study.
Another deflection.
You claimed I was arguing against stem cells when I was only arguing about the “evidence” you posted. I merely clarified my position so you will stop lying about it.
Re:
“tens of thousands of people going through the procedure without adverse effects?”.
Post link to certified evidence.
Then post link to quality evidence that the treatment worked.
Don’t tell me “err that’s what an article stated”. That is not evidence.
Don’t tell me “that’s what they said in testimonials”. I can easily get you several thousand fake testimonials and reviews for whatever product you want within a week just by contacting one of my sources.
LIE. So many LIES.
This is the study you posted.
You claimed you read it but:
You posted text from AN ARTICLE. You also KNEW it was an article. You CALLED IT AN ARTICLE:
What a bloody lying scum you are. Now you call me a liar. All this is been posted without any editing. I can easily post screenshots if you persist in lying.
Explain the deliberate omission of the most important part of the conclusion.
I am not letting this go since you turned around and called me a liar to cover up your lies.
Show me quality evidence of results then. According to the criteria I wrote above. All you have done is make up stuff about the studies.
Military spending is 53.71% of discretionary spending, which is only 29.34% of the total federal budget making military spending about 16% of the total federal budget.
They will be more so than the current system that is primarily designed for profits not outcomes. Stem cells work much better with a higher, better safety profile all while costing less. So they will be saving money. Get it?
So they are far more liable to have this as a choice, instead of being denied a choice so that pharma can make more money. Amazing what can be done with our “healthcare” system once the profit motive is taken away. Once stem cells reach a tipping point, it will be downhill for the medical tyranny of pharma.
This is not my position. I have not said ANYTHING against, nor for the single-payer system because I do not have enough information on the proposed system FOR YOUR COUNTRY, nor the current healthcare system of your country pertaining to it’s economics and demographics, to comment on it and I have no intention to dig further into it.
That’s right. I withhold comment on things I am not sure on rather than talking out of my ass like you.
Actually, I think they are following the TENET, “don’t throw your pearls before swine.” Whether your family members are Christians or not, given your consistent lies throughout this forum, I think it’s more likely that your family has accurately judged your character and decided to cut ties than that they have just decided to shun you out of hatred and spite.
I remain convinced this guy is nothing but a troll.
If you equate plagerism to an appropriation of private property, then you are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the immense majority of society.
Not quite suing, but I’ll remind you (one more time), that if you’re going to continue having an intellectually dishonest debate, you do not need to continue posting.
Sidestepping, misinterpreting, and fabricating arguments are not necessary. If that’s all you’ve got, along with recurring strawmen and frequently shifting goal posts, your time may have run its course.