That doesn’t explain the fact that you read the hamster study and thought it was done on humans, which does not absolve you from mockery for pure, unbridled stupidity.
That does not explain why you did not know the term “hamster heart model” was not in the study you were meant to post if you did not LIE about reading the study you were meant to post.
This was not the study you claimed you meant to post. It is not even about heart failure. You could not possibly have not known you had posted the “wrong” study after seeing the words “hamsters” and “heart failure” in it since this study is about MS.
You are giving me a very strong suspicion that you are very used to manipulating compassionate folk with cheap lies to get what you want in real life, and you get away with it not because they believe you, but being compassionate, they simply don’t call you out on your lies.
The ones you claimed you wanted to post were these, which were about heart failure.