"Stem Cell Secrets Exposed" Video

If it’s even a half way decent sentence/paragraph I usually drop it in google, lol.

3 Likes

Plagiarism can’t exist when you don’t believe in private property. “You don’t own those words, you imperliast bastards!”

2 Likes

I did. But FOX NEWS? LOLOLOL

The best part was the elections were 2 Sundays ago. This is a close runner up to the hamster study.

1 Like

With the context that Zep once called USMC dishonest and loved his personal Jesus (capitalism) after he posted a screenshot FROM THE ARTICLE ZEP POSTED, it’s not that weird.

1 Like

I avoid Fox because that Tucker fellow tends to give me the urge to want to punch him in the face. But Zep’s a self-proclaimed socialist. Fox should be like garlic to a vampire for him.

He used to listen to Rush Limbaugh so I guess old habit do really die hard.

PS I think you missed this gem, enjoy

*Never mind, I see you commented. What a thread…

1 Like

I didn’t read the whole thread. I only started engaging him when he started pushing alternative medicine and socialism.

You support single-payer → single-payer relies on limiting treatment choices to save money → The vast majority of Stem Cell treatments will not be covered by a single-payer system.

Why do you support limiting the public’s choice?

Why doesn’t the public have the fundamental right of choice?

If I claimed that they were outright socialist, then I’m sorry I was wrong. They have more socialistic policies and have done fine despite being constantly told this will destroy an economy. Their success says otherwise.

And you believe it’s okay to take everyone’s money for war. The redistribution is only seriously questioned when it will help the public.

So why isn’t the public granted a choice to have the procedure it wants? Their choice is basically to do nothing or take the garbage drugs produced by pharma. Which causes a myriad of side effects or even death(opioids).

You can be on the fence if you like. However tens of thousands of individuals have had positive experiences without any adverse effects and will continue to do so, if they are given a choice. Exactly what pharma doesn’t want.

False. I posted the study I read which didn’t say one thing about “low quality evidence” So who is omitting and lying now?

But pharma was/is.

To people with chronic/degenerative diseases it is. They don’t have the luxury of time to wait while science determines HOW this works. They have already seen the results! After all, results are more important to them.

And where are all the studies that PROVE its’ safety? It was first legalized back in 1996 in California. After 2 decades weren’t the dangers of this to come out? Many states have followed despite a lack of double-blind studies.

What should be done about this tragedy?

As a side note. I think it was YOU who posted the severely retarded post. Claiming that people using medicinal cannabis were doing so, just to get high. So all those kids using it to relieve their symptoms were just doing so to get stoned. And all their parents were probably just hippies wanting their children to experience mother nature. Millions of Americans use it just to get high.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

So it’s okay to plagiarize said clock?

The spelling and grammatical errors are minor and do nothing to belittle the point. But it is what you hang on to, to feel you’ve scored a point, it is ALL you have most of the times.

If I posted something without sourcing it, then it was an oversight. My articles are most always sourced.

Why because he occasionally tells the truth in defiance of his paymasters?

Yes, how dangerous to give the public freedom of choice when it comes to medicine and to be free of the capitalists whose main objective is money at almost any cost. How diabolical.

You mean like that fox news paragraph you just stole?

2 Likes

OK dumb dumb. Tell me how many kids use pot (Charlotte’s web or its derivatives) as an anti siesure medication vs. Total usage.

While you’re busy there outsmarting me, maybe you could explain why the legalization movement has morphed from only medical under certain circumstance to recreational use.

Yeah you really busted me there. I’m so ashamed.

You’re like a dildo made out of hogweed. Fucking stupid, useless, and contact results in a rash.

First, those are not “socialistic” policies. Social Democrats are NOT socialists. Those are social policies. Every country has them to varying degrees. They are public goods that every society recognizes are required for the benefit of the country.

Second:

I showed this in the charts for Sweden. You did not contest it.

The report on the Nordic Model YOU POSTED showed the same thing as the chart during the period it was written and concluded their system then without further increasing economic freedom and privatization was UNSUSTAINABLE.

Quit the bullshit.

No, that is not my belief. But you still have no argument because war has not resulted in increases in taxes to >50 percent.

Quit the stupid strawmans.

Why is a capitalist country like Panama allowing stem cells? Why don’t you boycott them if you object to capitalism?

Quit the stupid deflections. I have not even been arguing about pharma but you persist in deflecting so you won’t have to admit to lying about the study.

Another deflection.

You claimed I was arguing against stem cells when I was only arguing about the “evidence” you posted. I merely clarified my position so you will stop lying about it.

Re:

“tens of thousands of people going through the procedure without adverse effects?”.

Post link to certified evidence.

Then post link to quality evidence that the treatment worked.

Don’t tell me “err that’s what an article stated”. That is not evidence.

Don’t tell me “that’s what they said in testimonials”. I can easily get you several thousand fake testimonials and reviews for whatever product you want within a week just by contacting one of my sources.

LIE. So many LIES.

This is the study you posted.

You claimed you read it but:

You posted text from AN ARTICLE. You also KNEW it was an article. You CALLED IT AN ARTICLE:

What a bloody lying scum you are. Now you call me a liar. All this is been posted without any editing. I can easily post screenshots if you persist in lying.

Explain the deliberate omission of the most important part of the conclusion.

I am not letting this go since you turned around and called me a liar to cover up your lies.

Show me quality evidence of results then. According to the criteria I wrote above. All you have done is make up stuff about the studies.

So many lies, zep. So many lies.

1 Like

image

Military spending is 53.71% of discretionary spending, which is only 29.34% of the total federal budget making military spending about 16% of the total federal budget.

Social security and medicare are both larger and mandatory spending.

1 Like