so i have belived for a long time now, that larger splits or full body routines, are more effective at building strength and size, than the classical 1-2 muscle group split 5 days a week.
But now this article , 10 Reasons Bodybuilders Are Bigger Than Powerlifters
says( on page 2 under " training split " ) that recent research shows how those smaller splits results in greater hypotrophy than bigger splits.
Whats your opinion on this?
[quote]ultralars wrote:
so i have belived for a long time now, that larger splits or full body routines, are more effective at building strength and size, than the classical 1-2 muscle group split 5 days a week.
But now this article , 10 Reasons Bodybuilders Are Bigger Than Powerlifters
says( on page 2 under " training split " ) that recent research shows how those smaller splits results in greater hypotrophy than bigger splits.
Whats your opinion on this? [/quote]
What’s your opinion?
Try both and see what works for you.
ockhams razor suggest that splits are more effective…
Wow, A compound v. isolation thread and a TBT v. Split thread in the same day.
Is it trolling tuesday or something?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Wow, A compound v. isolation thread and a TBT v. Split thread in the same day.
Is it trolling tuesday or something?
[/quote]
lol and a what is attainable naturally thread in t-cell, its a perfect storm
well,I recently swifted from a 3xsplits to a 2x,loads went down but now I have 3 days without lifting to do cardio and going to sea so…also I noticed a deeper fatigue after each session.
yesterday I was not able to complete my schedule (delts,back,legs) because too much tired and too few carbos before training (heavy day at work)…
as september comes I switch to my 3xsplits as 1/loads used are higher 2/post work-outs fatigue is much less 3/rest is better
Mike
[quote]ultralars wrote:
But now this article , 10 Reasons Bodybuilders Are Bigger Than Powerlifters
[/quote]
First time I’ve read that article
Didn’t know whether to laugh or cry
Smaller splits are much better.