[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Beershoes wrote:
Not sure if you guys have been keeping up on what this guy has been doing with his time away from the octagon, but he’s down to 255, from 285. Thoughts? I’m hoping he’ll be a little faster and better conditioned. [/quote]
I watched the BUD video’s and I didn’t like what I saw. I think his nutritionist is border line retarded. They cut 30 pounds from his once powerful physique and while during the process cut back on Carwin’s protein consumption. I think he’s been adversely effected by both his spinal surgery and the way he lost to Brock Lesnar.
I still think he can beat Dos Santo’s but I wouldn’t bet on it after seeing those video’s.[/quote]
I saw that too. Carwin said he’s cut his protein consumption to 1/5th of what it was. And, he looks significantly thinner than he did against Lesnar. But, Carwin said he’s a believer. Maybe he’s just doing this for this fight to keep his wind up and be more “fluid” to compete against a smaller, quicker Dos Santos? I was kinda thinking the same as you after seeing those vids, but maybe that’s just my inner meathead sad that he’s no longer ingesting small cows daily.[/quote]
And when his nutrionist said that he’s “much smaller now with even more power” I wanted to scream at the TV. Since when does someone lose muscle weight (which Carwin obviously did) and become more powerful?
Does anyone think that he’ll be able to punch like Carwin of old? This is a classic case of the pendulum swinging too far one way after it was too far the other way. A smart plan would have been to lose just 15 pounds of fat, which he had. And keep up the protein intake in the process. No, no, no…I don’t like what I saw one bit.