Yes, it is used a lot of places. It's called google, use it.
And yeah, all of a sudden since you are forced to finally admit your title is wrong, it's on purpose.
And I did contribute by agreeing with you that the article in question was utter BS. I also noted that your title was wrong. You are the one that started the off topic argument about the merits of my used abbreviation. Talk about trivial.
No, it wasn't a miss-use. It was proof that lack of evidence in Wikipedia doesn't make something not exist. If the premise of your argument is true (Not being in wiki means something doesn't exist), then you have no brain.
Okay, I'm not sure what reward a clever 4 year old would want. gold star? What was your point? That you're a child? Mission accomplished.
Ã¢?? Ã¢??Show Spelled[an-thruh-puh-mawr-fik] Show IPA
ascribing human form or attributes to a being or thing not human, especially to a deity.
resembling or made to resemble a human form: an anthropomorphic carving.
Not to mention you were using anthropomorphic earlier.
I happen to be a scientist. I happen to do test design. But yeah, you go girl.
It wasn't expanded on because instead of discussing it, you chose to attack the other part of my post and me. If you had asked questions about that part I would have responded regarding that part.