I think this post gives some interesting insight into Iraqi politics:
http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2005/12/baghdad-county.html
Baghdad county
Bill Roggio’s last two posts from Iraq, Patrolling Haqlaniyah ( http://inbrief.threatswatch.org/2005/12/patrolling-haqlaniyah/ ) and On the Offensive in Ramadi ( http://inbrief.threatswatch.org/2005/12/on-the-offensive-in-ramadi/ ) describe a situation in which military operations have become a handmaiden to politics. Not American politics primarily , but Iraqi politics. For a sense of what that kind of politicking looks like Iraq the Model’s synopsis at Pajamas Media ( http://www.osm.org/site/story/2005127omarelectionoroundup ) is close to the best. Basically, the various tribes, religious and ethnic groups (even the Christians) are maneuvering for votes: including, surprise, surprise, the Sunni insurgents. “The new and interesting thing in this election is the large-scale participation of Sunni parties for the first time. These parties think they have a good chance to win many seats in the parliament.”
So it is less and less surprising that suicide attacks, such as the blast in a bus killing 30 people ( News: Breaking stories & updates - The Telegraph ) or the one which killed nearly the same number at a police academy ( http://news.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=us/6-0&fp=4398301a52eebdcc&ei=qR2YQ_eMEK7caeb3yLMO&url=http%3A//www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php%3Fstory_id_key%3D8306&cid=1102813326 ) involve Iraqis on Iraqis. It’s no longer war, properly understood, but politics Middle-Eastern style. (BTW the word “Iraqis” is consciously used knowing it conceals a multitude of differences. For a discussion on how Arabs aren’t all the same see Michael J. Totten: http://www.michaeltotten.com/archives/001010.html ) The purely military war in Iraq is over and America has won. The US casualty count carefully kept at Global Security ( U.S. Casualties in Iraq ) has never gone back to its 2004 levels and (in my view) probably never will. But though the politics may be bloody, the dynamics of the electoral arena described by Iraq the Model suggest something quite revolutionary has taken place:
But more important than all of this is the fact that in these few years, we have witnessed the birth of a sensibility that was buried for decades – Iraqi patriotism. This sense is currently represented in three political alliances/parties that ignore the ethnic and sectarian issues in their platforms. Relatively speaking, they are looking at Iraq as a whole.
Factions are struggling for control of Iraq through the ballot. Assisted by bombs, intimidation, bribery, and disinformation it’s true, but through the ballot. In this atmosphere, the carnival trial of Saddam Hussein almost makes sense, right down to the surreal presence of his defense attorney Ramzi Clark (spelling courtesy of Hammorabi).
Commentary
Victory when it came, was both greater and less; more partial and more complete than expected. It did not take the European form of parades down the Champs Elysee, followed by a return to old and establish ways of governance. What the destruction of the Ba’athist regime did was reanimate long suppressed local and ethnic interests and channel them into competition through the ballot box – with the occasional recourse to violence. Tremendous forces have been unleashed which critics of the war will point to as signs of an incipient civil war, but which supporters of OIF will describe as a newly liberated society feeling its way forward.
Whether OIF has wrenched events in the Middle East from their old tracks and put them on a better route remains to be seen. What is less debateable is that OIF has subtly changed America. The Armed Forces have acquired capabilities they never had before. Bill Roggio in Patrolling Haqlaniyah ( http://inbrief.threatswatch.org/2005/12/patrolling-haqlaniyah/ ) describes three-tour veterans who can talk politics with Iraqis. For many individual Americans Iraq is now something less than home and something more than a foreign country. For America as a whole, one thing that no politician will dispute in 2008 is that aside from being a European and Pacific power – which it has been since the end of the Second World War – the US is now a part of the strategic landscape of the Middle East and Central Asia.
Eastern European countries are no longer dictatorships under Soviet control. They freed themselves through a series of revolutions (or through more peaceful means, depending on the case) about a decade and a half ago.