Regular Gonzalez wrote:
And these two people were somehow personally responsible for the killing of Russians in the 90’s?
How would you respond if an American civilian got beheaded in the middle east and someone on this site decided to apply the same logic you are using here.
Hell no. I never said they were responsible. The article said the killings were in retaliation for beheadings in Iraq. Were there any Russians beheaded in Iraq? To me that is idiotic logic right there.
I merely said, using the article’s logic, that if the beheadings were in retaliation for something, it makes more sense if the killings were in retaliation for beheadings against Russians.
As far as justifying the beheadings. . . . When did I do so? I merely said if the Islamists are beheading people, they should not be surprised when other fanatics use the same tactics as well.
Ok my bad, I misunderstood what you meant.
When I first read the comment “what goes around comes around” it almost sounded as though you were callously inferring that the killings were justified.