Rush Limbaugh Detained

Off Topic Politics and World Issues
21

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Professor X wrote:
It is up to righteous Conservatives everywhere to save the country by any means necessary. Down with Freedom!!! Unless it is approved by Christian Republicans.

You might want to clue Tipper “No Twisted Sister” Gore in on this. Perhaps Gloria Steinham and the rest of the NOW gang should be clued in as well.

You can do better than vent your frustration out on the evil right wing. At least I hope you can. [/quote]

I have to say the only ones that seem to be coming up with new laws that do nothing but apparently push morals to the extreme would be the extreme right. That thread started about DUI and marijuana comes to mind (Though I can’t say for sure that a Republican was behind it). Censorship is the goal apparently…on all levels. What power does Tipper Gore have? Aren’t the Republicans running the country now?

22

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Aren’t the Republicans running the country now?[/quote]

Yeah, but what does that have to do with Clinton getting a blowjob?

23

[quote]tme wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Aren’t the Republicans running the country now?

Yeah, but what does that have to do with Clinton getting a blowjob?

[/quote]

You mean he actually, intentionally, put his you-know-what in another persons mouth?

Good Lord…

Why didn?t he think about the children?

And if he DID think about the children while getting a blow job, I mean really, is this the better alternative…

Hardly…

24

WTF? Who really cares?

25

Here’s a question that hasn’t been asked: why did Rush need a bottle of viagra in the Dominican Republic?

Is there something the DR is known for that would precipitate a man needing boner pills?

Hey,what’s this?

Indeed, the Dominican Republic is one of the biggest sex tourism destinations in the world, thanks in part to Internet sites that extol the country as a “single man’s paradise.”

Family values at their best.

26

[quote]harris447 wrote:
Here’s a question that hasn’t been asked: why did Rush need a bottle of viagra in the Dominican Republic?

Is there something the DR is known for that would precipitate a man needing boner pills?

Hey,what’s this?

Indeed, the Dominican Republic is one of the biggest sex tourism destinations in the world, thanks in part to Internet sites that extol the country as a “single man’s paradise.”

Family values at their best.[/quote]

I think those values only last as long as they are crying for votes. We have to think about the children!..At least until they can get a cheap teenaged hooker in TiaJuana.

27

[quote]harris447 wrote:
Indeed, the Dominican Republic is one of the biggest sex tourism destinations in the world, thanks in part to Internet sites that extol the country as a “single man’s paradise.” [/quote]

I know where my next vacation is going to be.

28

[quote]
harris447 wrote:
Indeed, the Dominican Republic is one of the biggest sex tourism destinations in the world, thanks in part to Internet sites that extol the country as a “single man’s paradise.” [/quote]

Limbaugh joked about the search on his radio show… He later added, chuckling: “I had a great time in the Dominican Republic. Wish I could tell you about it.”

29

[quote]futuredave wrote:
Limbaugh joked about the search on his radio show… He later added, chuckling: “I had a great time in the Dominican Republic. Wish I could tell you about it.”[/quote]

LOL. If a democrat was caught leaving the country to be an immoral hypocrite the republicans would be screaming about it all over the place.

So, is Rush part of the moral majority Christian coalition or anything like that?

30

[quote]JeffR wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
JeffR wrote:
First of all, let’s wait for more information.

JeffR

LOL.

It’s really funny that when Rush Limbaugh is arrested, we should wait for more information, but at the same time you’ll start a whole thread about the empty shells of weapons made before 1991 and how it justifies the entire war in Iraq.

I think you should take your own advice sometimes Jeffry.

Hey little irish,

Perhaps you read the rest of my article? I clearly said he should be punished if this is proven to be true.

Funny how you skipped over that.

I know, not thinking through the issues gives you street cred with your liberal sycophants. Your mantra, “Read only what supports your position. Anything else should be scorned or dismissed.”
[/quote]

You are more guilty of this than anyone I’ve never met. So shut the fuck up.

They are old, ineffective weapons. The Pentagon said, “This isn’t why we went in”. Although I guess you skipped over that part of the article, huh?

Or maybe it’s not your fault being as I think FoxNews forgot to report that part. Hell, the way you act, I’d bet you worked for them. In between powerlifting meets, I mean.

Yea I do. And they were “right”. Where we goin with this? Dig your hole deeper…I don’t think the walls have collapsed yet…

31

[quote]harris447 wrote:
Here’s a question that hasn’t been asked: why did Rush need a bottle of viagra in the Dominican Republic?

Is there something the DR is known for that would precipitate a man needing boner pills?

Hey,what’s this?

Indeed, the Dominican Republic is one of the biggest sex tourism destinations in the world, thanks in part to Internet sites that extol the country as a “single man’s paradise.”

Family values at their best.[/quote]

Well at least you’re not making any assumptions or being judgmental…Oh wait I forgot it’s okay for lefties like you to do that stuff.

Sorry.

32

342×501 41.4 KB

33

[quote]
You are more guilty of this than anyone I’ve never met. So shut the fuck up.[/quote]

I love when you talk tough. I tingle. Oh, I think pox tried to accuse me of cherry-picking information. You saw how that turned out.

In short, I don’t. I’m aware of both sides of the issues.

However, I don’t have much hope for you.

Actually, if you took the time to read, you would see that that is exactly what pox accused me of omitting. Take a peek, it’s right there.

Oh, I still haven’t been able to determine who the “officials” were that said, “this isn’t why we went in.”

It wasn’t the official Pentagon response as far as I know. If I’m wrong, please educate me.

Oh, if you had read, you would see that the declassified report warned quite clearly that they were still potent and dangerous.

At least you are consistent. Wrong, that is. Take a peek at the article. I even linked it for you. You will see that Fox News did indeed link to the information directly.

No.

I’ll let you know how it goes.

Actually, they weren’t. I posted a link to msnbc (for marmaprick). The headline, “CIA says no WMD in Iraq.”

That isn’t what the CIA said at all. They warned that there were going to be WMD found. They said the programs weren’t active at the time of the invasion.

Big difference.

I’ll bet with your tough talk, you would be an ideal rescuer. I look forward to it.

JeffR

34

[quote]JeffR wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
JeffR wrote:
Remember the MSM “NO WMD in Iraq” headlines?

Wrong.

JeffR

WTF?

ROTFLMFAO!!!

JeffR
[/quote]

Where is the link to a credible article that says the CIA is wrong?

Once a tool always a tool.

35

[quote]Marmadogg wrote:
JeffR wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
JeffR wrote:
Remember the MSM “NO WMD in Iraq” headlines?

Wrong.

JeffR

WTF?

ROTFLMFAO!!!

JeffR

Where is the link to a credible article that says the CIA is wrong?

Once a tool always a tool.[/quote]

marma-prick,

Don’t waste my time with this sorry tactic.

You quoted, and laughed at, me saying that there were headlines trumpeting the “No WMD in Iraq” headlines.

I posted what I was talking about.

If you only read the headline (which you and your pals are rountinely guilty of) you would think that the CIA stated that there were “No WMD in Iraq.”

That isn’t true. That isn’t what the CIA was saying. They were stating that there were no active programs for WMD at the time of the invasion.

Fools have taken this as literally meaning “There were no WMD in Iraq.” You hear and read it all the time.

Read the article. If the best you can do is call me a “tool,” don’t bother responding.

If you don’t use your cortex, I’m not going to waste time with your little schemes.

JeffR

36

[quote]ZEB wrote:
harris447 wrote:
Here’s a question that hasn’t been asked: why did Rush need a bottle of viagra in the Dominican Republic?

Is there something the DR is known for that would precipitate a man needing boner pills?

Hey,what’s this?

Indeed, the Dominican Republic is one of the biggest sex tourism destinations in the world, thanks in part to Internet sites that extol the country as a “single man’s paradise.”

Family values at their best.

Well at least you’re not making any assumptions or being judgmental…Oh wait I forgot it’s okay for lefties like you to do that stuff.

Sorry.

[/quote]

I think that throwing out the “leftie” vs “conservative christian” accusations over a radio entertainment personality is a little fucking rediculous. Rush got searched, got caught, and was probably running around the Dominican Republic without a shirt yelling “I’m Rush Limbaugh bitch!”

I’m no liberal but I feel no obligation to come to the defense of a guy who spouts off on the radio. Unless you are discussing Howard Stern.
Rush Limbaugh would just as quickly switch to a democratic point of view if he felt he could get better ratings. He is hardly worth defending.

37

[quote]JeffR wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
JeffR wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
JeffR wrote:
Remember the MSM “NO WMD in Iraq” headlines?

Wrong.

JeffR

WTF?

ROTFLMFAO!!!

JeffR

Where is the link to a credible article that says the CIA is wrong?

Once a tool always a tool.

marma-prick,

Don’t waste my time with this sorry tactic.

You quoted, and laughed at, me saying that there were headlines trumpeting the “No WMD in Iraq” headlines.

I posted what I was talking about.

If you only read the headline (which you and your pals are rountinely guilty of) you would think that the CIA stated that there were “No WMD in Iraq.”

That isn’t true. That isn’t what the CIA was saying. They were stating that there were no active programs for WMD at the time of the invasion.

Fools have taken this as literally meaning “There were no WMD in Iraq.” You hear and read it all the time.

Read the article. If the best you can do is call me a “tool,” don’t bother responding.

If you don’t use your cortex, I’m not going to waste time with your little schemes.

JeffR

[/quote]

Like Rove says…if you’re explaining you’re losing.

Loser.

38

Jerffy still doesn’t realize that the fact that the White House won’t officially adopt the stance that they were right about WMD’s in Iraq is absolute proof that they weren’t.

The White House would NOT lose the opportunity to say “I told you so.”

So, instead, we have talking heads making up spin, which, as usual, Jerffy sucks up like a hoover on a dick. Slurpee slurpee Jerffy.

You are a complete and absolute clown and hack… and I don’t think one person on the board thinks otherwise, democrat or republican.

How’s them bipartisan apples?

39

[quote]Marmadogg wrote:

Like Rove says…if your explaining your losing.

Loser.[/quote]

I appreciate you taking the time to think through the issues.

Thanks.

JeffR

40

[quote]JeffR wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:

Like Rove says…if you are explaining you are losing.

Loser.

I appreciate you taking the time to think through the issues.

Thanks.

JeffR
[/quote]

Why would I try to be any different than you are