Rudy, Very Bad Week

[quote]Hello, bradley wrote:
JeffR wrote:
I laughed one of those rib-splitting, can’t get air, laughs when a clintonite was discussing family values.

Marriage!!!

You have absolutely no shame.

Should we talk about marriages? Okay Jeffy, you seem to be an expert on Rudy JulieAnnie. Did Rudy marry his first cousin, or was it his second cousin?

Also, is that technically considered “incest”, or not? I thought you might have some personal expertise that you could draw from, on this issue. Would the specific state of residence make a difference?

I wonder what Rudy’s family reunions are like. Uncomfortable, probably?

You’re absolutely right about 911 though, George W. Bush did a heckuva job keeping America safe on that day.

Oh, wait…
[/quote]

Hello, bradley.

To be perfectly honest, I haven’t looked up his wives.

As a matter of fact, unless he broke a law, I don’t give a rip.

Thanks for acknowleding that if blame was to be placed, the lion’s share was clinton’s.

Again, I do appreciate the extreme humor of a clinton-ite disparaging anyone’s personal life.

Thanks again!!!

JeffR

Given Brad’s pathological obsession with Rudy, perhaps “Brad” is one of Rudy’s former wives?

I mean, he sounds like the kind of jilted, vengeful, scorned teary-eyed fishwife completely invested in smearing Rudy for the sake of a vendetta.

I mean, I am no fan of Hillary Clinton, but I can be objective about her as a candidate. “Brad” has no such ability about any GOPer - and his mania with Rudy is downright kooky.

Since it has to be about wives…

Fred Thompson wins, thank you…

If Rudy wins it will be further evidence that our country is rapidly approaching the edge of a cliff.

Less than half of GOP voters even know he is pro-choice…there are similar numbers for people who know he is anti-2nd Amendment etc…

Rudy is as liberal as Hillary Clinton…

I cannot wait until someone points out that he did nothing on 9/11 and that the true heroes from 9/11 despise Rudy…(Emergency workers).

Not to mention he is a liar, he recently claimed he knew after the '93 bombing of the WTC that this was a declaration of war despite the fact that after he took power in '94 he didn’t even ask candidates for the Chief of Police about terrorism and then put the Office of Emergency Management’s emergency center placed at World Trade Center 7.

More proof that Rudy is lying about knowing '93 was just the beginning? After 9/11 he had to ask someone what to read on this Osama guy…

But mostly, he is a liar and an asshole who mocks sick people.

[quote]JeffR wrote:
storey420 wrote:
JeffR wrote:
storey420 wrote:
Why would anyone vote for this guy anyways? I had to sringe when I saw him on the other day and in his speech he said “if there is one thing that this presidential campaign should be about, it’s staying on the offensive against terrorism” Is this really the most important thing we should look at for the leader of our country? Are we that fear based as a society?

Now to some that means invading countries where terrorists are harbored but it doesn’t have to. We have been “on the offensive” for several years now, depending on your definition of that.

Fear based?

Man, you are beyond help.

Of course you want to stay on the offensive.

Defensive (circa 1990’s) led to 9/11/01.

JeffR

What I meant is that it should be a given that we are and have been on the offensive regardless if people like yourself think so or not. Also the definition of offensive is interpretive. I’m assuming that you have neither worked in or read a great deal on clandestine services but if you asked some of those former operators, they might disagree about just how “defensive” their missions were.

Being on the offensive doesn’t have to mean invading countries, although that is one tactic. Of course you are admitting then that by circa 1990’s that the policies of former president Bush contributed to 911.

Nah, storey.

The offensive you speak of wasn’t very effective, see 9/11.

Further, see post 9/11. How many attacks on U.S. soil again?

I’m talking about going to the root of the issue and not playing defense.

If you would like to discuss the multitude of intelligence failures and tepid to no response to obvious threats that occurred during the 1992-2000 time period, I’d be happy to discuss it.

Oh, I know a couple of guys who are pissed as hell that they were hamstrung in their efforts during said years.

JeffR
[/quote]

If you know some current or former operators then you know that this situation is just as clusterfucked if not more so than in the past. The illusion of security is at an all time high but it’s just that, an illusion.

There are thousands of brave Americans out there keeping us safe but invading other countries that didn’t have a direct link with the 9/11 attacks is not a reasonable offensive measure to me.

Come on Jeff, I know you are way smarter than the “well there haven’t been any attacks on American soil” party liners. That is skewed logic. I’m going to agree that during Clinton’s administration, they cut the hamstrings of several missions which ultimately led to loss of American lives due directly to political posturing and pussyfooting–despicable.

Rudy has always been a joke in my neck of the woods.

Bloomberg would make a fantastic president!

[quote]SouthernBrew wrote:
If Rudy wins it will be further evidence that our country is rapidly approaching the edge of a cliff.

Less than half of GOP voters even know he is pro-choice…there are similar numbers for people who know he is anti-2nd Amendment etc…

Rudy is as liberal as Hillary Clinton…

I cannot wait until someone points out that he did nothing on 9/11 and that the true heroes from 9/11 despise Rudy…(Emergency workers).

Not to mention he is a liar, he recently claimed he knew after the '93 bombing of the WTC that this was a declaration of war despite the fact that after he took power in '94 he didn’t even ask candidates for the Chief of Police about terrorism and then put the Office of Emergency Management’s emergency center placed at World Trade Center 7.

More proof that Rudy is lying about knowing '93 was just the beginning? After 9/11 he had to ask someone what to read on this Osama guy…

But mostly, he is a liar and an asshole who mocks sick people.[/quote]

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jul/02/giuliani_and_firefighter_union_head_trade_blows_in_press

[quote]Ren wrote:

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jul/02/giuliani_and_firefighter_union_head_trade_blows_in_press [/quote]

His opponents, Romney and McCain are just biding their time before they put up an advertisement with the 9/11 emergency workers disowning Rudy…

Show a video of the firemen and others say they do not support Guiliani and do not credit him and then end the advertisement with something like "Who will you support, the heroes who ran into the burning buildings to save Americans or a politician?)

[quote]southernBrew wrote:
Ren wrote:

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jul/02/giuliani_and_firefighter_union_head_trade_blows_in_press

His opponents, Romney and McCain are just biding their time before they put up an advertisement with the 9/11 emergency workers disowning Rudy…

Show a video of the firemen and others say they do not support Guiliani and do not credit him and then end the advertisement with something like "Who will you support, the heroes who ran into the burning buildings to save Americans or a politician?)
[/quote]

southern,

Check who the unionized firemen support on a regular basis.

Are they Republicans?

No.

For instance, john kerry in 2004.

I’d be more impressed if they didn’t have an obvious political axe to grind.

JeffR

[quote]JeffR wrote:
southernBrew wrote:
Ren wrote:

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jul/02/giuliani_and_firefighter_union_head_trade_blows_in_press

His opponents, Romney and McCain are just biding their time before they put up an advertisement with the 9/11 emergency workers disowning Rudy…

Show a video of the firemen and others say they do not support Guiliani and do not credit him and then end the advertisement with something like "Who will you support, the heroes who ran into the burning buildings to save Americans or a politician?)

southern,

Check who the unionized firemen support on a regular basis.

Are they Republicans?

No.

For instance, john kerry in 2004.

I’d be more impressed if they didn’t have an obvious political axe to grind.

JeffR
[/quote]

They criticized him before he entered the race…the fact is that Rudy is running on 9/11 and the true heroes of 9/11 do not support him…in fact they seem to hate the guy.

[quote]SouthernBrew wrote:
JeffR wrote:
southernBrew wrote:
Ren wrote:

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jul/02/giuliani_and_firefighter_union_head_trade_blows_in_press

His opponents, Romney and McCain are just biding their time before they put up an advertisement with the 9/11 emergency workers disowning Rudy…

Show a video of the firemen and others say they do not support Guiliani and do not credit him and then end the advertisement with something like "Who will you support, the heroes who ran into the burning buildings to save Americans or a politician?)

southern,

Check who the unionized firemen support on a regular basis.

Are they Republicans?

No.

For instance, john kerry in 2004.

I’d be more impressed if they didn’t have an obvious political axe to grind.

JeffR

They criticized him before he entered the race…the fact is that Rudy is running on 9/11 and the true heroes of 9/11 do not support him…in fact they seem to hate the guy.[/quote]

Again, pal, he’s a Republican.

Therefore, if you look at their history (check out who they support routinely) you’ll see that, in their eyes, Republicans (Rudy, etc…) and their motives are suspect.

If you’d like to learn more about their history, google it.

You’ll find that this may be less to do with Rudy than it is a party thing.

JeffR

[quote]JeffR wrote:
SouthernBrew wrote:
JeffR wrote:
southernBrew wrote:
Ren wrote:

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jul/02/giuliani_and_firefighter_union_head_trade_blows_in_press

His opponents, Romney and McCain are just biding their time before they put up an advertisement with the 9/11 emergency workers disowning Rudy…

Show a video of the firemen and others say they do not support Guiliani and do not credit him and then end the advertisement with something like "Who will you support, the heroes who ran into the burning buildings to save Americans or a politician?)

southern,

Check who the unionized firemen support on a regular basis.

Are they Republicans?

No.

For instance, john kerry in 2004.

I’d be more impressed if they didn’t have an obvious political axe to grind.

JeffR

They criticized him before he entered the race…the fact is that Rudy is running on 9/11 and the true heroes of 9/11 do not support him…in fact they seem to hate the guy.

Again, pal, he’s a Republican.

Therefore, if you look at their history (check out who they support routinely) you’ll see that, in their eyes, Republicans (Rudy, etc…) and their motives are suspect.

If you’d like to learn more about their history, google it.

You’ll find that this may be less to do with Rudy than it is a party thing.

JeffR

[/quote]

Their motives are suspect?

SO you are accusing the people who risked their lives of turning 9/11 into some political scheme?

[quote]SouthernBrew wrote:
JeffR wrote:
SouthernBrew wrote:
JeffR wrote:
southernBrew wrote:
Ren wrote:

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jul/02/giuliani_and_firefighter_union_head_trade_blows_in_press

His opponents, Romney and McCain are just biding their time before they put up an advertisement with the 9/11 emergency workers disowning Rudy…

Show a video of the firemen and others say they do not support Guiliani and do not credit him and then end the advertisement with something like "Who will you support, the heroes who ran into the burning buildings to save Americans or a politician?)

southern,

Check who the unionized firemen support on a regular basis.

Are they Republicans?

No.

For instance, john kerry in 2004.

I’d be more impressed if they didn’t have an obvious political axe to grind.

JeffR

They criticized him before he entered the race…the fact is that Rudy is running on 9/11 and the true heroes of 9/11 do not support him…in fact they seem to hate the guy.

Again, pal, he’s a Republican.

Therefore, if you look at their history (check out who they support routinely) you’ll see that, in their eyes, Republicans (Rudy, etc…) and their motives are suspect.

If you’d like to learn more about their history, google it.

You’ll find that this may be less to do with Rudy than it is a party thing.

JeffR

Their motives are suspect?

SO you are accusing the people who risked their lives of turning 9/11 into some political scheme?[/quote]

Hey, pal.

You don’t know me. However, if you did, you would know that it’s hardly possible for me to feel more pride or kinship for a group of people than I do with the firefighters.

However, having some knowledge of how Unions work, I’m well aware that quite a few statements are not based on altruism.

Greed and self-serving motives, unfortunately, are quite apparent.

Finally, I’d be interested to know if any of the members who signed the “Rudy don’t show up to give a speech” or cassidy himself were in the Twin Towers on that date.

I honestly don’t know. However, I’ll bet they weren’t.

Finally, there is often a disconnect between what the union leadership says and what the majority of the rank and file believe.

I distinctly remember the Firefighters cheering wildly when Rudy appeared in the days after 9/11.

I’ve read extensively about this particular “grievance” they have about Rudy. It sounds as though the leadership is MOSTLY angry about Rudy moving them from digging around the site after the attack.

He gave them x amount of days. They refused to move. Rudy wanted them out for safety purposes. He explained it. They still wouldn’t move.

He sent the cops to escort them away. Fists flew and the unions have been mad ever since.

Rudy was in a no-win situation. Sounds like he chose safety. If I know those guys, they would have continued digging indefinitely. Rudy had to make a call and he made it.

Of course, the nitwits/dems will say that he was “being mean.”

The other crap “moving headquarters into the WTC was bad” and so forth is just a waste of time to discuss.

Finally, if you are interested in discussing the actual DETAILS let me know. If you are a bradley and don’t really care about anything except political power, also let me know. In the latter case, we’ll save each other some time.

JeffR

[quote]JeffR wrote:
I honestly don’t know. However, I’ll bet they weren’t.[/quote]

Why would you bet that?

[quote]JeffR wrote:
I distinctly remember the Firefighters cheering wildly when Rudy appeared in the days after 9/11.[/quote]

Heat of the moment…they probably would have cheered anyone who stood up and said anything remotely decent

[quote]JeffR wrote:
He gave them x amount of days. They refused to move. Rudy wanted them out for safety purposes. He explained it. They still wouldn’t move.

He sent the cops to escort them away. Fists flew and the unions have been mad ever since.[/quote]

It wasn’t for safety reasons, he wanted to speed up the process using a “scoop and dump” strategy whilethe Firefighters wanted to recover their fallen brothers.

—In November 2001, our members were continuing the painful, but necessary, task of searching Ground Zero for the remains of our fallen brothers and the thousands of innocent citizens that were killed, because precious few of those who died in the terrorist attacks had been recovered at that point.

Prior to November 2001, 101 bodies or remains of fire fighters had been recovered. And those on the horrible pile at Ground Zero believed they had just found a spot in the rubble where they would find countless more that could be given proper burial.

Nevertheless, Giuliani, with the full support of his Fire Commissioner Thomas Von Essen, decided on November 2, 2001, to sharply reduce the number of those who could search for remains at any one time. There had been as many as 300 fire fighters at a time involved in search and recovery, but Giuliani cut that number to no more than 25 who could be there at once.

In conjunction with the cut in fire fighters allowed to search, Giuliani also made a conscious decision to institute a “scoop-and-dump” operation to expedite the clean-up of Ground Zero in lieu of the more time-consuming, but respectful, process of removing debris piece by piece in hope of uncovering more remains.

Mayor Giuliani’s actions meant that fire fighters and citizens who perished would either remain buried at Ground Zero forever, with no closure for families, or be removed like garbage and deposited at the Fresh Kills Landfill.

Our Local presidents at the time attempted to meet with the Mayor to stop this despicable treatment of those who perished, but he refused to even see them face-to-face.

The scoop-and-dump continued. And when hundreds of family members of the fallen joined with our affiliate leadership and members to protest Giuliani’s decision, he ordered senior officers of the New York Police Department to arrest 15 of our FDNY brothers, including a number of local elected IAFF leaders.

Giuliani modified his policy after the protest because public opinion was so strongly with our members. Ultimately, he was forced to put the fire fighters back on the pile. Our protests were later proven justified as more bodies were ultimately recovered and those families given a chance for some closure and a decent burial.

Giuliani argued that the change was for our own safety, but his argument was empty and without substance. Fire fighters had been on that pile since minutes after the twin towers fell â¿¿ why all of a sudden, after nearly two months working on the pile, was Giuliani concerned about fire fighter safety?----

[quote]JeffR wrote:
Rudy was in a no-win situation. Sounds like he chose safety. If I know those guys, they would have continued digging indefinitely. Rudy had to make a call and he made it.[/quote]

It had nothing to do with safety, that much is obvious

[quote]JeffR wrote:
The other crap “moving headquarters into the WTC was bad” and so forth is just a waste of time to discuss.
[/quote]

Waste of time?

I think the fact that Rudy went against the advice of experts and placed the emergency command center in the WTC which had long been identified as a target for terrorists as well as actually having been attacked by terrorists…not to mention the huge amounts of diesel fuel kept in the building which were ultimately responsible for the buildings collapse.

Who in their right mind places a cities emergency command center IN a building that contained huge amounts of diesel fuel as well as being a target for terror attacks?

A moron, not a “terrorist expert”…not to mention a liar who blamed someone else only to have the “scapegoat” produce evidence than Guilani was lying…

Then you have the radios used by emergency workers, which had been found to be faulty in 93’ WTC terror attacks but despite numerous protests and requests Guiliani did not upgrade…ultimately found responsible for many of the emergency workers’ deaths …

Then you have the following, taken from Wiki

—Giuliani has been subject to increased criticism for downplaying the health effects of the air in the Financial District and lower Manhattan areas in the vicinity of the Ground Zero.[83] He moved quickly to reopen Wall Street, and it was reopened on September 17. He said, in the first month after the attacks, “The air quality is safe and acceptable.”[84] However, in the weeks after the attacks, the United States Geological Survey identified hundreds of asbestos hot spots of debris dust that remained on buildings. By the end of the month the USGS reported that the toxicity of the debris was akin to that of drain cleaner.[85]It would eventually be determined that a wide swath of lower Manhattan and Brooklyn had been heavily contaminated by highly caustic and toxic materials.[85][86] The city’s health agencies, such as the Department of Environmental Protection, did not supervise or issue guidelines for the testing and cleanup of private buildings. Instead, the city left this responsibility to building owners.[85]

Firefighters, police and their unions, have criticized Giuliani over the issue of protective equipment and illnesses after the attacks.[83]An October 2001 study by the National Institute of Environmental Safety and Health said that cleanup workers lacked adequate protective gear.[87] The Executive Director of the National Fraternal Order of Police reportedly said of Giuliani: “Everybody likes a Churchillian kind of leader who jumps up when the ashes are still falling and takes over. But two or three good days don’t expunge an eight-year record.” [88] Sally Regenhard, said, “There’s a large and growing number of both FDNY families, FDNY members, former and current, and civilian families who want to expose the true failures of the Giuliani administration when it comes to 9/11.” She told the New York Daily News that she intends to “Swift Boat” Giuliani.[89]

A May 14, 2007 New York Times article, “Ground Zero Illness Clouding Giuliani’s Legacy,” gave the interpretation that thousands of workers at Ground Zero have become sick and that “many regard Mr. Giuliani’s triumph of leadership as having come with a human cost.” The article reported that Giuiliani seized control of the cleanup of Ground Zero, taking control away from experienced federal agencies, such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Army Corps of Engineers and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. He instead handed over responsibility to the “largely unknown” city Department of Design and Construction. Documents indicate that the Giuliani administration never enforced federal requirements requiring the wearing of respirators. Concurrently, the administration threatened companies with dismissal if cleanup work slowed.[90] The New York Times faulted his decision-making on the post September 11 cleanup of the World Trade Center site, in the lead editorial of the May 22, 2007 issue. Additionally, the Times took Giuliani to task for his handling of worker safety at the site and the issue of first responder health problems. [91]

Giuliani wrote to the city’s Congressional delegation and urged that the city’s liability for Ground Zero illnesses be limited, in total, at $350 million. Two years after Mayor Giuliani finished his term, FEMA appropriated $1 billion to a special insurace fund to protect the city against 9/11 lawsuits.[92]

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is contemplating calling Giulani to testify before a Senate committee on whether the government failed to protect recovery workers from the effects of polluted Ground Zero air.[93][94]

Matt Taibbi wrote an article for the June 14, 2007 issue of Rolling Stone, blaming Giuliani for rushing the recovery effort and setting a poor example for recovery workers [95].

In June of 2007, former Republican Governor of New Jersey and director of the Environmental Protection Agency Christie Whitman reportedly stated that the EPA had pushed for workers at the WTC site to wear respirators but that she had been blocked by Giuliani. She stated that she believed that the subsequent lung disease and deaths suffered by WTC responders were a result of these actions. [23]—

Rudy should not be allowed to run on 9/11, if he is not hammered by his opponents on his failings surrounding 9/11 then I will be shocked and will begin counting down to the Apocalypse…

[quote]SouthernBrew wrote:
[/quote]

Hey, pal, would you make sure to use the quote function? I may have missed some of the comments you made.

Now, let’s cut to the quick about the main grievance: Do you think Rudy is ignorant or callous to the point where he decided to dishonor the dead and damn the consequences?

Seriously. If the man has .00000001 of a politician in him and .00000001 of a heart, then he has got to know that the WTC cleanup would be a charged atmosphere.

Just in case you think that the union leadership of the IAFF are the only voice, here’s Lee Ielpi FDNY, Retired.

His son Jonathon was killed in the WTC attacks.

from: 10 Best CBD Companies to Buy From in 2022: Honest Reviews & Guide | Observer

[quote] To America’s Firefighters: No American will ever forget the terrorist attacks of September 11th. As a firefighter, I know the courage and sacrifice the firefighters and first responders showed that day to rescue our friends and loved ones. I also greatly respect the leadership by our public officials. One of those people was Mayor Rudy Giuliani. There is no one who respects firefighters and first responders more than Rudy Giuliani. That’s why I was deeply disappointed and disheartened to learn of the recent partisan political activities by the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF). Those of us who have worked with him know that Rudy Giuliani has always been a steadfast and unrelenting supporter of firefighters and first responders. The IAFF’s accusations in its “draft letter,” which made its way into the hands of the media, flies in the face of the facts. It is offensive and inaccurate. Firefighters have no greater friend and supporter than Rudy Giuliani and I am proud to join thousands of firefighters across the country in supporting him. Sincerely,

Lee Ielpi FDNY, Retired[/quote]

Note the word he used about the leadership: PARTISAN.

If you believe that Rudy was purposefully trying to anger the firefighters or desecrate the graves, then why don’t we stop talking?

If you believe the above, then you have an axe to grind and are not open to another viewpoint.

In that case vote for ron paul, hillary, or whatever other freak turns you on.

I’ll stick with the guy who is dedicated to destroying the terrorists, securing the border, and fighting crime.

http://www.joinrudy2008.com/index.php?section=2

JeffR

[quote]JeffR wrote:

Hey, pal, would you make sure to use the quote function? I may have missed some of the comments you made.[/quote]

My apologies, I forgot to add one end-quote which rendered my post gibberish

[quote]JeffR wrote:
Now, let’s cut to the quick about the main grievance: Do you think Rudy is ignorant or callous to the point where he decided to dishonor the dead and damn the consequences?[/quote]

I think Rudy made a calculated decision to place the importance of a speedy cleanup over the importance of recovering the human remains…

It had nothing to do with safety, that much is obvious…if it wasn’t safety why else did he do it but to speed up the cleaning process?

[quote]JeffR wrote:
Seriously. If the man has .00000001 of a politician in him and .00000001 of a heart, then he has got to know that the WTC cleanup would be a charged atmosphere.[/quote]

You could say the same thing about everything Bush/Cheney have done…but they certainly are politicians.

Appeal to Authority Fallacy(blame some jackass from another post who accused me of this fallacy for reminding me of it…he was wrong)

[quote]JeffR wrote:
Just in case you think that the union leadership of the IAFF are the only voice, here’s Lee Ielpi FDNY, Retired.

His son Jonathon was killed in the WTC attacks.

from: 10 Best CBD Companies to Buy From in 2022: Honest Reviews & Guide | Observer

To America’s Firefighters: No American will ever forget the terrorist attacks of September 11th. As a firefighter, I know the courage and sacrifice the firefighters and first responders showed that day to rescue our friends and loved ones. I also greatly respect the leadership by our public officials. One of those people was Mayor Rudy Giuliani. There is no one who respects firefighters and first responders more than Rudy Giuliani. That’s why I was deeply disappointed and disheartened to learn of the recent partisan political activities by the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF). Those of us who have worked with him know that Rudy Giuliani has always been a steadfast and unrelenting supporter of firefighters and first responders. The IAFF’s accusations in its “draft letter,” which made its way into the hands of the media, flies in the face of the facts. It is offensive and inaccurate. Firefighters have no greater friend and supporter than Rudy Giuliani and I am proud to join thousands of firefighters across the country in supporting him. Sincerely,

Lee Ielpi FDNY, Retired

Note the word he used about the leadership: PARTISAN. [/quote]

So the union of 280,000 firefighters is partisan but this guy is not?

Here is a mother of a fallen firefighter,to prove this guy does not speak for all of them(or most of them)

In December 2006, Sally Regenhard, mother of firefighter Christian Regenhard who died on September 11, and co-founder of the Skyscraper Safety Campaign, vowed to expose the truths of Giuliani’s actions on 9/11 before 2008, stating, “I can’t see why any 9/11 family member who knows the truth about the failures of the Giuliani administration . . . would not be outraged.”[82] She said in April 2007, “The bitter truth is that Rudy Giuliani is building a path to the White House over the bodies of 343 firefighters.”[81]

[quote]JeffR wrote:
If you believe that Rudy was purposefully trying to anger the firefighters or desecrate the graves, then why don’t we stop talking?

If you believe the above, then you have an axe to grind and are not open to another viewpoint.

In that case vote for ron paul, hillary, or whatever other freak turns you on.[/quote]

I think Guiliani made a decision to speed up the process and placed more importance on speed than safety or respect for the fallen.

[quote]JeffR wrote:
I’ll stick with the guy who is dedicated to destroying the terrorists, securing the border, and fighting crime.

http://www.joinrudy2008.com/index.php?section=2

JeffR

[/quote]

Destroying the terrorists? By not reading the 9/11 commission report(or simply not understanding a damn thing it said), by dropping off the Iraqi Study Group so he could make money in speaking engagements?

By placing the cities emergency command center in a known terrorist target sitting on “pool of diesel fuel”?

By regularly refusing requests by emergency workers for funding for replacement radios known to be defective?

By claiming he knew the 93’ WTC attacks were the first of many attacks when he did not even ask candidates for his police chief about terrorism?

By not knowing who Osama Bin Laden was despite “knowing they would attack again” and having to ask for a book to read up on the terrorist who he claimed to know would attack again?

Securing the Border? This is just one more change of position…Before he began running for President he fought to prevent educational and health benefits for illegals from being curtailed…

Michelle Malkin–
“When Congress enacted immigration reform laws that forbade local governments from barring employees from cooperating with the INS, Mayor Rudy Giuliani filed suit against the feds in 1997. He was rebuffed by two lower courts, which ruled that the sanctuary order amounted to special treatment for illegal aliens and were nothing more than an unlawful effort to flaunt federal enforcement efforts against illegal aliens. In January 2000, the Supreme Court rejected his appeal, but Giuliani vowed to ignore the law.”

Rudy- “Some of the hardest-working and most productive people in this city are undocumented aliens. If you come here and you work hard and you happen to be in an undocumented status, you’re one of the people who we want in this city. You’re somebody that we want to protect, and we want you to get out from under what is often a life of being like a fugitive, which is really unfair.”

He is anti-deportation for illegals currently living here, pro"path to citizenship" etc…

In short, Rudy is pro-illegal, anti-gun, anti free speech etc…which is only made worse since he has repeatedly changed his opinions on these issues based on what job he is running for and who he is talking to…

[quote]SouthernBrew wrote:
JeffR wrote:

Hey, pal, would you make sure to use the quote function? I may have missed some of the comments you made.

My apologies, I forgot to add one end-quote which rendered my post gibberish

JeffR wrote:
Now, let’s cut to the quick about the main grievance: Do you think Rudy is ignorant or callous to the point where he decided to dishonor the dead and damn the consequences?

I think Rudy made a calculated decision to place the importance of a speedy cleanup over the importance of recovering the human remains…

It had nothing to do with safety, that much is obvious…if it wasn’t safety why else did he do it but to speed up the cleaning process?

JeffR wrote:
Seriously. If the man has .00000001 of a politician in him and .00000001 of a heart, then he has got to know that the WTC cleanup would be a charged atmosphere.

You could say the same thing about everything Bush/Cheney have done…but they certainly are politicians.

Appeal to Authority Fallacy(blame some jackass from another post who accused me of this fallacy for reminding me of it…he was wrong)

JeffR wrote:
Just in case you think that the union leadership of the IAFF are the only voice, here’s Lee Ielpi FDNY, Retired.

His son Jonathon was killed in the WTC attacks.

from: 10 Best CBD Companies to Buy From in 2022: Honest Reviews & Guide | Observer

To America’s Firefighters: No American will ever forget the terrorist attacks of September 11th. As a firefighter, I know the courage and sacrifice the firefighters and first responders showed that day to rescue our friends and loved ones. I also greatly respect the leadership by our public officials. One of those people was Mayor Rudy Giuliani. There is no one who respects firefighters and first responders more than Rudy Giuliani. That’s why I was deeply disappointed and disheartened to learn of the recent partisan political activities by the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF). Those of us who have worked with him know that Rudy Giuliani has always been a steadfast and unrelenting supporter of firefighters and first responders. The IAFF’s accusations in its “draft letter,” which made its way into the hands of the media, flies in the face of the facts. It is offensive and inaccurate. Firefighters have no greater friend and supporter than Rudy Giuliani and I am proud to join thousands of firefighters across the country in supporting him. Sincerely,

Lee Ielpi FDNY, Retired

Note the word he used about the leadership: PARTISAN.

So the union of 280,000 firefighters is partisan but this guy is not?

Here is a mother of a fallen firefighter,to prove this guy does not speak for all of them(or most of them)

In December 2006, Sally Regenhard, mother of firefighter Christian Regenhard who died on September 11, and co-founder of the Skyscraper Safety Campaign, vowed to expose the truths of Giuliani’s actions on 9/11 before 2008, stating, “I can’t see why any 9/11 family member who knows the truth about the failures of the Giuliani administration . . . would not be outraged.”[82] She said in April 2007, “The bitter truth is that Rudy Giuliani is building a path to the White House over the bodies of 343 firefighters.”[81]

JeffR wrote:
If you believe that Rudy was purposefully trying to anger the firefighters or desecrate the graves, then why don’t we stop talking?

If you believe the above, then you have an axe to grind and are not open to another viewpoint.

In that case vote for ron paul, hillary, or whatever other freak turns you on.

I think Guiliani made a decision to speed up the process and placed more importance on speed than safety or respect for the fallen.

JeffR wrote:
I’ll stick with the guy who is dedicated to destroying the terrorists, securing the border, and fighting crime.

http://www.joinrudy2008.com/index.php?section=2

JeffR

Destroying the terrorists? By not reading the 9/11 commission report(or simply not understanding a damn thing it said), by dropping off the Iraqi Study Group so he could make money in speaking engagements?

By placing the cities emergency command center in a known terrorist target sitting on “pool of diesel fuel”?

By regularly refusing requests by emergency workers for funding for replacement radios known to be defective?

By claiming he knew the 93’ WTC attacks were the first of many attacks when he did not even ask candidates for his police chief about terrorism?

By not knowing who Osama Bin Laden was despite “knowing they would attack again” and having to ask for a book to read up on the terrorist who he claimed to know would attack again?

Securing the Border? This is just one more change of position…Before he began running for President he fought to prevent educational and health benefits for illegals from being curtailed…

Michelle Malkin–
“When Congress enacted immigration reform laws that forbade local governments from barring employees from cooperating with the INS, Mayor Rudy Giuliani filed suit against the feds in 1997. He was rebuffed by two lower courts, which ruled that the sanctuary order amounted to special treatment for illegal aliens and were nothing more than an unlawful effort to flaunt federal enforcement efforts against illegal aliens. In January 2000, the Supreme Court rejected his appeal, but Giuliani vowed to ignore the law.”

Rudy- “Some of the hardest-working and most productive people in this city are undocumented aliens. If you come here and you work hard and you happen to be in an undocumented status, you’re one of the people who we want in this city. You’re somebody that we want to protect, and we want you to get out from under what is often a life of being like a fugitive, which is really unfair.”

He is anti-deportation for illegals currently living here, pro"path to citizenship" etc…

In short, Rudy is pro-illegal, anti-gun, anti free speech etc…which is only made worse since he has repeatedly changed his opinions on these issues based on what job he is running for and who he is talking to…

[/quote]

Hey, brew,

Who do you favor and why?

Thanks in advance,

JeffR

[quote]JeffR wrote:

Hey, brew,

Who do you favor and why?

Thanks in advance,

JeffR
[/quote]

That is a good question and I am not sure what the answer is…

I am a libertarian however no libertarian has much of a shot of winning…I will still probably vote for one simply because I don’t believe voting based on who you think will win is constructive.

Rudy- I think we already know why I would not vote for him, if he would quit lying and changing his positions as well as stop running on things he has no business running on…but he would never do that.

Romney- Changes positions as much as Rudy does, supports invasion of civil liberties with domestic surveillance, wants to double the size of Guantanamo and prevent them from seeing lawyers…not to mention he treats his dogs like shit.

McCain- Pro-Illegal immigration and pro-amnesty…the farthest “left” republican candidate on immigration followed by Rudy. Anti-Gun…Pro-Abstinence only education…anti-birth control…wants to get even more hawkish on drugs which I believe should be legal to consenting adults.

Clinton- First she comes off as bad to me as Rudy, both seem to me to be lying pricks who will say whatever it takes to become president…She wants more restrictions on the economic market(despite the fact most of the problems are caused by government interference)She refuses to look at Israel from an objective standpoint and falls into the category that 99% of Americans fall into, which is blind support for a foreign nation. If you wish to support Israel, fine…but don’t do so blindly and ignore the fact that they are “playing” us for our support and we are just blindly giving it to them. She is also another who supports “amnesty” for illegals, is extremely hawkish and believes that we need to prevent Iran from going nuclear because they would be a threat to Israel(alarm bells going off anyone? We are now doing security work for a foreign country that has proven it can protect itself?)…wants to make flag burning illegal, is for gun control…in short I really do not like Hillary

Edwards- Pro illegal immigration, was a scummy ambulance chaser who got rich off tragedy and then has the nerve to act like he is still “one of the people” despite his obvious wealth and life of luxury

Obama- Pro gun control, pro illegal immigrant, another blind Israeli ally…I don’t agree with most of his positions but at the same time he tends to stand out from the crowd since he seems to be honest and actually seems to believe what he is saying.

In short, I don’t know who I will vote for but I DO know who I will NOT vote for.