Furthermore, and generally speaking, female s instinctively hunt out security in their mate. Modern day security is in the form of money and power, primitive security being strength and power. Once that is landed the female seeks to spread her genes by fornication with other males, and trick the mate into believing he is the father, thereby wreaking the benfit of the security found in the first male, and at the same time spreading her genes.[/quote]
I was with you up until “once that is landed”, where you broke from anything that has any basis in anything other than your own mind. It’s like you read 5 pages of The Red Queen or Sperm Wars or The Mating Mind and it’s led you to believe that you are a fucking accredited evolutionary psychologist.
I don’t know if you got burned by women when you were younger, I’m fairly confident you’re not a misogynist, but there sure is a lot of borderline shit in that post. Social grooming is an issue, but men have been groomed to be castrated knights in shining armor as much as women have been groomed to be ‘taken.’
Women with men who are perceived to be less than they are either delusional or have issues with self-esteem (or, alternatively, the external judgement of wealth is biased). Female infidelity in equal relationships has nothing to with an inborne “instincts” gained through evolution, esteemed professor.
Also, I’ll field your question of what happened to natural selection: nothing. Natural selection has to do with adaptation and nothing else. Stupidity has nothing to do with it. Survival of the fittest is not a literal term, and whatever your definition of “weakest” is, I’m gonna go ahead with an educated guess in saying it’s wrong.