Internal rotation isn’t necessarily bad. It’s like a normal function of your shoulders. Sometimes as you get Muscle Bound or old you lose your internal rotation ROM.
Your shoulders go into internal rotation during the upright row. If you have the ROM/flexibility, it’s no problem. If you lack that ability to move into internal rotation, and do upright rows, you can grind your shoulders up.
Swapping out moves is totally cool, but don’t neglect your internal rotation. You don’t want lose it!
As for replacements, do forget about Lu Raises and rear delt rows.
IMO you need more rear delt work and direct trap work - I like rear delt flyes and cable-face pulls for these, respectively. you’ve got DB press and Military press, which target primarily the same muscles and is a bit unnecessary for hypertrophy.
Most trainers would recommend keeping some of those “riskier” exercises isn’t a problem so long as you aren’t in pain from it. If Lat Pulldowns behind the neck aren’t hurting your shoulders - there is no reason not to do them… I believe this thinking should apply to your upright row as well.
I’ve tried incorporating these into my regimen a few times and it never really felt right… I watched the CT video and read the article, it just never felt like it had enough stimulation with explosives - and doing them with hypertrophy style has me using some ridiculously low weight.
Do you perform yours explosive or more hypertrophy style? if the latter, do you recall your weights being quite light when you first started?
maybe its just me with my shit genetics and “nothing matters” approach because i might not know what im doing, but… do people really notice visible growth if they switch the exercises in the “correct” manner?
Cuz i dont… i believe my body doesnt give a fuck if i train rear this or side that, or upper/lower chest or inner thigh or smth…
I have never seen an exercise make a difference. At all.
If an exercise is common to cause people issues and could potentially be a poor choice for a joint, and it doesn’t matter what exercise you choose for said muscle… then why wouldn’t you swap to something else
eh I think it’s a bit of semantics with a bit of immeasurable ‘by feel’ sprinkled on top.
I’ve been educating myself on different training methods quite a bit since I started here and have a few conflicting opinions that I haven’t sorted out just yet. Was going to go more into detail but I don’t think it’s necessary… I can say that for ME, certain movements provide better results than others. They typically align with general concensus on ‘best movements for x muscle’ but differ sometimes.
I think the answer to your question would change from one person to the next - it appears exercise selection doesn’t do much for you and thats great! For me (example), I see no results with flat bench whatsoever - so I do incline and have reasonably well developed pecs. I wanted to see the separation between the upper pecs and rest of the muscle, so I did reverse-grip bench for a few weeks - and I saw the separation.
In these ways, it seems very individualized.
DC Training kind of aligns with your beliefs (to my understanding) that the exercise is kind of irrelevant as long as youre moving some heavy ass weight and beating the logbook.
EDIT: +1 to what @wanna_be said. I didn’t consider injuries, but yes - some exercises are incredibly injury prone while others are far safer versions.