Ok ryanw2007, I will attempt to explain what the hell is happening here, with the hope, however remote, that you have some traces of human intelligence.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
yea i am from bodybuilding.com i guess… i rarely post though…[/quote]
Please keep it like that.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
but i am not trying to be arrogant or childish[/quote]
So how do you call telling someone that they just wasted 15 minutes of their time without even knowing their training purposes?
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
and just because i like to shorten my words doesnt mean u gotta cry about it.[/quote]
It’s not just shortening the words. It’s your complete incapacity of writing beyond the skills of a C- high school student that is completely unacceptable for someone trying to provide criticism.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
so when i use db for dumbbell or bb for barbell im childish too interesting.
[/quote]
Red herring + strawman. And that was one hell of a run-on sentence.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
i know intensity is greater then volume but volume does play a key role in size. [/quote]
Red Herring + non sequitur. This comment is only valid if the OP’s intended goals involve sarcoplasmic hypertrophy.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
doesnt mean u go and do 10 sets of each exercise yes i know but it does mean u gotta at least put in two exercises for a single bodypart. [/quote]
For what purpose? For your training purposes, certainly. But not for all. You suck at logic dude.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
there actually was a study done showing that the old school way of 1 set per bodypart can actually decrease your muscle size. [/quote]
Weasel words + non sequitur. Again, the OP’s intended goal behind the exercise wasn’t size. Logic fail ftw.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
so u say muscle size isnt his goal its strength. [/quote]
Nobody has said that. You are building a strawman fallacy so that you can argue about it. Instead, stick to the issues at hand.
Furthermore, please answer my previous question about your opinion about short circuits for anaerobic conditioning.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
well guess what strength takes more than one set too. [/quote]
Non sequitur. Have you asked the OP why he did it?
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
oh its not for strength either??? [/quote]
Maybe, maybe not. And that’s the point. You don’t fucking know. Ergo, your retarded criticism was unwarranted, illogical and out of place.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
hmm maybe he is trying to get his metabolism up… ok get more muscle mass by doing more sets to get the size or u can do cardio. [/quote]
Since when increasing muscle is a requirement to increase metabolism? If I want stay at a particular weight class, say, for wrestling, why would I want to increase my size when looking to increase my conditioning?
Again, please answer my question regarding short circuits for conditioning.
Also, if he could do cardio, he’s not limited to use a treadmill. He could very well use weights for high reps and/or in combination with HIIT or plyometrics.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
when i do high intensity circuit training for leaning out preshow my work outs last no shorter than 30 mins no longer than 45 mins. [/quote]
So? Who cares? What does your personal experience when it comes to leaning out for a bodybuilding contest has to do with the goals of other people’s training in general, and on short training circuits in particular?
You still don’t know what the OP’s intentions where. You didn’t even had the decency to ask before throwing shit at him.
That. Is. The. Crux. Of. The. Matter.
Do. You. Get. That?
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
to mention i only lost 5 pounds of muscle throguh the entire cut phase which i find pretty damn good
[/quote]
Of course it’s pretty damn good. And congratulations to you. But what the fuck does this has to do with the OP’s intentions.
You are trying to lecture people on shit without knowing what the fuck they are doing.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
correct me if i am wrong…
[/quote]
You are not wrong in YOUR training for YOUR goals. You are pretty fucking wrong in believing everybody trains like you, for the things you care.
You are not the apex of training. You do not epitomize the essence of training. Your goals are not the alpha and omega. Give that kind of lecture to people who seek it, for goals compatible to yours.
It might come as a surprise to you, but a lot of people that might be a lot stronger or with better conditioning that you IN OTHER AREAS OF TRAINING might not give a shit about what you do or what you stand for.
With your antics and poorly composed posts, you are being an embarrassment to bodybuilders. Fortunately, I’d dare to say most bodybuilders aren’t like you and know how to provide criticism IN THE APPROPRIATE TRAINING CONTEXT.
[quote]ryanw2007 wrote:
and to top it off your writing in a bodybuilding section what else do i think ur on here for???[/quote]
On top of it, it’s not “your”. It’s “you are” or “you’re”. What? Did you finish HS? Didn’t they teach you basic English grammar?
Second, I hate to tell you this. This might be a bodybuilding site, but guess fucking what? Check the editorials. They range on all topics of fitness, bodybuilding and otherwise. Power lifting, combat sports, crossfit, bodybuilding, figure/fitness, (Olympic) weightlifting, rehab and injury prevention, you name it.
Unlike you, most posters don’t pigeon hole their heads into little, nicely cut black and white, mutually exclusive training topics.
People read the editorials, articles and forum threads and freely borrow ideas between training disciplines.
I know the concept might be terrifying and confusing to you, but truly, progressive thinking is really cool and good.
Now consider this. Let’s assume just for shits and giggles that indeed the OP is
- a bodybuilder, and
- he’s training for size and leanness as needed for competition.
Imagine if you will, one of those days (or weeks) that shit really doesn’t work as planned, and you only have a brief time, say less than 30 minutes to go in, work out, take a shower and go to work.
In such a situation, it calls for things like what the OP did, for motivation, for mental training, to break monotony. Hell, even to avoid depression. This is a fact. A fact of science, and a fact of life.
Given that you still continue to talk shit without having the the decency to ask the OP the purpose of his training in general, and of this short workout in particular, I leave you with the point previously made for you to think (if you are capable of mental thought.)
And here I give up trying to explain this any further. If you don’t get this, then the following image will do you justice:
[photo]21609[/photo]
BTW, don’t bother replying back until you answer my question regarding short circuits for anaerobic conditioning.