You keep saying this as if repetition will transform it from garbled nonsense to compelling reasoning. It won't. Trump -- remaining exactly as stupid as he is -- will have colluded with the Kremlin if he was aware of a single dollar received from them by his campaign (this being the subject of the recording that incited the directors of the CIA and FBI to put together a task force and seek a warrant in the first place). You're pretending that it would be some kind of intellectual feat on Donald Trump's part for Carter Page, e.g., to be sent to transact with Igor Diveykin. This is a laughable and transparent game of make-believe.
There are many more examples that are both plausible (as in: have been alleged by people of high reputation) and leave Donald Trump's renowned idiocy intact. As I have already explained, many of them in fact rely on Trump's being an idiot.
Or maybe you want to pretend that a person can be a subliterate buffoon but if he accepts, dull-eyed and without contributing a single ounce of the strategic thought that goes into planning such a transaction, the aid of foreign agents for whom it is their professional trade to communicate in secret (and often with dimwitted shitbags like pimps and fortune tellers), then he must possess some secret intelligence? That's fine. I would counsel against so cheapening your concept of intelligence, but I don't really care.
As an aside, this is the kind of addled, reductive-&-indirect-yet-supposedly-producing-hard-certainties reasoning that people use to come to facile, embarrassing conclusions all the time. Another widely-abused example, cut from the same cloth as what you're trying here: "He is either dumb or rich, he can't be both." Nah, because we know by way of dispositive direct evidence that he's both dumb and rich, and the formulation was built on a false and simplistic dichotomy -- a juvenile sense of how the world must be in the first place. And so on.
I'm not interested in further exploring this illogic of yours. There is plenty actual material to discuss here, so why waste our time on specious pablum. Feel free to question the actual evidence -- there's a fuckin' mountain of it for you -- but I'm done with this becuz muh false dichotomy logic shit.