Thread title "Pulse Feast Options"
Op's initial statement "I'm thinking of trying the Pulse Feast."
You could have absolutely said "don't do the pulse feast". But you didn't. You were relating it to the pulse feast. "i think the success some people have had on the pulse-feast indicates that the number of meals isn't that important, rather getting some protein every few hours and meeting your daily macros is what's important"
This statement is completely wrong. That isn't what the pulse feast indicates at all.
It actually indicates the opposite. That getting a steady stream of protein isn't important.
This would be akin to someone asking about a 5/3/1 plan and you laying out a Westside routine for them.
I never said pulse feast is the way to go, or that any off it worked or didn't work. I'm not saying something like you laid out is a bad way to go. But the guy asked about the pulse feast and you responded with a suggestion that is the polar opposite.